L.A. Times Fearful of Truth About Obama, Ayers & Khalidi

I wonder if the New York Times would go even this far to cover for Barack Obama and his relationships with terrorists, both foreign and domestic.

I wonder (sarcastically) what they're afraid of? Perhaps not only turning the tide for McCain, but maybe even creating a landslide late in the campaign? If this video they're hording contains what I think it contains, it would and should spell the end for Obama's presidential hopes.

If, after all the reporting by anyone, including any and all right-wing television news shows, conservative radio and well-known as well as independent bloggers (not to mention the transparent bias of the mainstream press themselves) haven't convinced you that that very same MSM is so far in the tank for Obama (actually, then there is really no help for you) this suppression of information by the Times is the icing on the cake and the end game is near.

As it says in the piece the reason they're not releasing the video (printed in where else?..the Los Angeles Times)

"The Los Angeles Times did not publish the videotape because it was provided to us by a confidential source who did so on the condition that we not release it," said the newspaper's editor, Russ Stanton. "The Times keeps its promises to sources."

That would beg the question then, if the source wanted to keep it a secret, why would they have given it to the Times at all?

Little Green Footballs has another take on the matter. Note the story about Hamas campaigning for Obama immediately following.
Also check out the suppressing of information of WBEZ radio in Chicago about hiding obama recordings pertaining to Obama's “redistribution of wealth” plan and comparing America to Nazi Germany.
And even following that...ah, just read the whole page and/or blog, it's all relevant.