Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Did You Know...?

The first "birthers" were Dems. Mmm Hmm. It's true. Maybe someone should tell Rick Sanchez.
According to John Avalon, author of the new book "Wingnuts: How the Lunatic Fringe is Hijacking America,'' he claims that Linda Starr (who was the source of the false documents meant to disgrace President Bush in his bid for re-election and got Dan Rather fired) and Philip Berg, who were supporters of Hillary Clinton's 2008 presidential campaign, were actually the first to bring up the question of Barack Obama's place of origin. Those crazy lefties, huh?

I'm just sayin'.

Palin's "Crib Notes"

You know, I wasn't even going to comment on Sarah Palin's "notes" (in actuality, there were a couple words, as in headings, not actually what she was going to say-like some presidents nowadays) because it's all muchado about nothing. But since the regular peanut gallery of Wolf Blitzer, Keith Olberloon, Rachael Madcow-who's racism comes shing through in the fact she thinks blacks are too dumb to take a civics test to be able to vote-and Chris Tingle are having a field day with it and as usual, ignoring that their guy can't even talk to grade-school children without a teleprompter; I had to mention their usual hypocrisy. 'Nuff said.

Tuesday, February 09, 2010

Real Threat or More Posturing?

When it comes to Iran, I wouldn't take any chances. Like I said in a prior post, are they preparing for war? Will the appologists say America cannot strike pre-emptively, but Iran has the right to "defend itself?" Probably.

Monday, February 08, 2010

Murtha Dies at 77

If Al Gore Gets His Way...

It'll be just like this:

Taxpayer Money Going to Hamas?

Obama is not only spending obscene amounts on furthering another recession and bankrupting the United States Treasury, he's apparently supplying Hamas with funds to help them send more missles and suicide-bombers into Israel.

Good job, Barry.

Penn State Finds No Wrong Doing with Mann

Whitewash! Too much money involved to investigate thoroughly, I guess. What do you think they tell their children, other than asking them how much they like their new ponies courtesy of John Q. Taxpayer?

In a related story...
H/T to Moonbattery

Democrat CO2 Sanity?

Ever since the insane decision to make the natural occurrence of CO2 in our atmosphere a pollutant, it seems some Democrats have decided to tell the rest of their crazy party that they need to re-think their mandates on the subject. With President Obama's encouragement, the EPA is poised to attach itself to every aspect of American lives. I guess these Democrats saw the light (with the help of the admonishment of their constituents, I'm sure) and decided to stand on the side of liberty. Good for them.

Sunday, February 07, 2010

Sarah Palin's Tea Party Convention Speech

Simply Awesome!!

The Language of the Left

I'm sure you've noticed by now when the left's idiotic ideas are wholly rejected by a more informed and vigilant public, they keep trying the same old ideas that have been rejected time and time again (the textbook definition of insanity, by the way) but they think the voters are so stupid and naive that they won't notice when the left simply changes the name of their latest pet project. A few examples would be, global warming=climate change, abortion=reproductive rights, tax increases=tax cut repeal, socialism=equality for all, and so on.

Is it that the left really are this arrogant and stubborn and simply just don't care what the voters think, or are they the ones who are naive and just can't handle the fact that their ideas and wants, all in the name of dictatorial power (not so cleverly disguised as "for the people") are historically repugnant?

One things for certain, they won't stop trying, they never do.

Newsweek the Latest to Join the Awakened

This is not the Obamaland everyone remembers. What is going on? This is the fourth left-wing news outlet to finally tell it like it is. Is the sky falling, or what?

Dems Applaud $1.9 Trillion Debt Limit

Via Reuters...


WASHINGTON, Feb 4 (Reuters)

The U.S. House of Representatives on Thursday voted to increase the government's borrowing authority to $14.3 trillion, sending the measure to President Barack Obama to sign into law.
By a vote of 233 to 187, the House voted to raise the nation's debt limit by $1.9 trillion, which will probably allow lawmakers to avoid revisiting the politically toxic issue before November congressional elections.

The Senate passed the bill last week. No Republicans voted for the measure in either chamber.
Mindful of a growing voter backlash over government spending, Democrats crafted the legislation to require that new spending be offset elsewhere in the budget.
Such "pay as you go" legislation helped the country turn budget deficits into surpluses in the 1990s, Democratic leaders said.
"This is one of those things that has the benefit of being both symbolically and substantively beneficial," former President Bill Clinton told fellow Democrats on a conference call.
Obama hailed the passage of the bill, and in a statement said the "pay as you go" provision "will help usher out an era of irresponsibility and begin putting the country back on a fiscally sustainable path."

Congress has periodically raised the legal limit for the government's borrowing and the Treasury Department is expected within weeks to exceed the current $12.4 trillion limit set in December.
Failure to raise the limit would roil financial markets, but lawmakers are never eager to sign off on a measure that allows the government to dig itself deeper into debt.
"Our creditors around the world on whom we are now relying in order to fund our government don't really care about our partisan politics," said House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer. "They do care however about the will that we have to meet our responsibilities, to pay our bills."
But that did not stop Democrats and Republicans from blaming each other for the country's rapidly spiraling debt load, which has more than doubled over the past decade.

EXCHANGING BLAME

Democrats pointed to the tax cuts, pricey prescription-drug benefit and wars in Iraq and Afghanistan pursued under former Republican President George W. Bush.
Republicans criticized the aggressive spending measures Democrats have taken to blunt the impact of the deepest economic downturn in 70 years.
"They took out a monster loan that is not paying off," said Republican Representative Pete Sessions.

The government spent a record $1.4 trillion more than it collected in the past fiscal year, and the White House expects that this year's deficit will be even worse.
Experts warn that investors could demand higher interest rates on U.S. debt if Obama and Congress do not get deficits under control.

Obama plans to set up a commission to figure out ways to reduce the deficit, but Republicans have indicated that they might not cooperate because they view it as a ploy to raise taxes.
Democrats said paygo will also help Congress stay within its means by requiring new spending programs or tax cuts to be offset by tax increase or spending cuts elsewhere in the budget. But it would not apply to existing programs like Social Security and Medicare that are projected to eat up an increasing portion of the budget over the coming decade, and lawmakers could set the rule aside for spending designated an unforeseen emergency, such as relief to Haiti.



C-SPAN turns the sound down (always) after the gavel, but you can hear Dems applaud the raising of the debt limit in the House after the vote...
H/T to HotAir Pundit

One of His Best Ever!

You know once in a long while, I am given a reprieve from the nausea that Keith Olberloon causes me and I am infected with a case of the laughies at this moron's ultimate idiocy. This tirade just goes to show, it's all about Keith. This is just to good for words. Have a look for yourself.



Olbermann's network president, Phil Griffin, has said, "Keith has been our tentpole." Adding later about the MSNBC host's dismal ratings (that are falling more and more every single day) "I'm pleased with where we are."

I'll decline the urge to go leftist and attempt a sexual innuendo here about the tentpole remark.



If he keeps this up, regardless of the naivete of Griffin, this may happen to poor ol' Olby:


H/T on the photo to Moonbattery

This, From the New York Times?

What is the world coming to? No hatred? No vitriol? This is Sarah Palin he's writing about here, isn't it? Did someone hijack the political section of the NYT?

Saturday, February 06, 2010

Happy Birthday Mr. President





Between him and George Washington, the best presidents there ever were.

Media Waking Up?

I doubt it. After all, they have too much invested in their guy. After all the fawning books, periodicals, articles and comments, they can't possibly now say that they were out and out wrong. But are they now starting to realize that the current president isn't the saviour they all made him out to be, that in fact, he is fallible? and that the MSM haven't been doing their job all along, that perhaps if he were a Republican, they would have treated him differently?
But regardless, this seems to be happening more and more recently.

Just a Public Relations Glitch

So the frauds and Gore-aphites that wish to keep lying to you and take your money to line their own pockets in the name of "research" and the "plight of the planet," still maintain that their science is sound. Again, with no concern about their mass fraud on the human populace nor none to those who challenge their made-up numbers. They simply choose to keep on deceiving legitimate concerns concerning their numbers and scientific evaluations. And still they give absolutely no credence to the thousands of environmental scientists (including Nobel laureates) that dispute their findings and simply want to be taken serious and have an honest debate without being labeled as holocaust deniers. There is never an absolute in science.

Speaking of the Goracle, Bucky the cat is back with another funny:

Bush and Ft. Hood

I'm losing it. I'm totally losing it. This news item was from November, right after the Ft. Hood shooting and I missed it (so did the MSM, who rather chose to omit this story from their nightly newscasts-if I'm wrong, somebody correct me) But I bet I'm not the only one who was kept from this story. I only found out about oit through an email I recieved recently.

The story I got goes like this:


So, who told the White House?


Bush Asked by White House to Leave Ft. Hood

A nurse had taken this picture with the camera phone of the injured soldier, Alabama Army Guard, Maj. Randy Royer. There is a false story that was going around that Mrs. Royer had recieved a false text message concerning her husband and that she rushed into his room to find the president and Mrs. Bush already there and that President Obama didn't even show up to visit the wounded soldiers and only hung around long enough for a photo-op in the gym and all that sort of nonsense. But this story is false and according to Maj. Royer's own account:

"On Friday the 6th, President Bush and his wife made a visit to us, no frills, no press. It was awesome. They were down-home, normal people. They were able to visit with us and other soldiers in the ICU. The pic was taken on my cell phone and I had it sent to a few people and somehow it got around, but we don't know who or why the email was started. We really appreciated President Bush and Laura taking the time to visit the soldiers, especially after all they had gone through. We also had many other visitors in the following days, including President Obama and Michelle. They were just as friendly and concerned and were able to speak to us after the memorial ceremony."



A little more on the story you may find interesting from RightPundits.com:

It has been a bit disconcerting that the President of the United States has seemed so terribly disengaged from a terrorist attack on a military base in the heartland of the United States. On American soil. He gave some lip service to the ‘horrific outburst of violence’ at the end of some comments he made at the end of the Tribal Nation Conference on the day of the attack. He warned people to not ‘jump to conclusions’ - you know, like he did when a white police officer was doing his job and got cussed out by one of Obama’s friends and they all ended up having to have a ‘beer summit’ with the President to improve race relations. Yeah, don’t jump to conclusions like he does.
Of course, the reason he warned about jumping to conclusions is that it turns out that the Army Major is a muslim with a muslim name. Major Nidal Malik Hasan. He’s the alleged perpetrator, traitor and enemy combatant who
cornered a large crowd of unarmed Soldiers in the Soldier Readiness Center at Ft. Hood in Killeen, Texas.
Okay, so we won’t jump to conclusions, Mr. President. But the question remains, why has the president shown so little interest in an attack being perpetrated by an enemy combatant on a military base on American soil? Why the downplaying? Rationalizing it away? Giving his family in Palestine a voice via American media outlets to decry the Global War on Terrorism? The spin seems to be that he’s disgruntled, mistreated by his peers for being muslim, scared of being deployed. Yada-yada.
The other side to that story comes from virtually everyone else who tells us that he initiated arguments with peers at work, couldn’t relate to the Soldiers he was ‘treating’ at Walter Reed Hospital and apparently told everyone within listening distance that he was ‘muslim first, American second.’ He also made statements to many people that he viewed an attack on an Army recruitment center as justified and that muslims should take up arms against American troops.
This is NOT a disgruntled, mistreated guy who was picked on because he’s muslim. This is an enemy combatant and a traitor to the United States.
Meanwhile, former President George W. Bush and his wife Laura Bush
quietly visited the wounded from the Ft. Hood massacre on Friday. They didn’t allow photo opts, rather quietly visited the wounded. They are said to have spent hours there and were very concerned and comforting to the wounded and grieving.
Obama, on the other hand, the President of the United States, hasn’t gotten around to getting down to Texas yet. He’s just been so busy, don’t cha know.
Here is Obama’s schedule for Saturday.
11:25AM THE PRESIDENT addresses the House Democratic Caucus - Cannon House Office Building
2:30PM THE PRESIDENT makes a statement to the press on Health Care - Rose Garden
2:45PM THE PRESIDENT and THE FIRST LADY depart The White House en route Camp David - South Lawn
Perhaps he simply doesn’t care. Or perhaps, he’s having to try to figure out how to keep people from finding out that the terrorist who attacked our Soldiers at Ft. Hood was a member of Obama’s transition team. He was a member of the Homeland Security Policy Institute. It’s on page 32 of the Obama Transition Team documents.
Is that Obama, Hasan connection the reason that Hasan has been under investigation for six months and yet was free to go about a military base undeterred? Obama IS the commander-in-chief after all. Food for thought and something that makes you more than a little sick to your stomach.
One has to wonder how deep this rabbit hole goes. Barack Hussein Obama, hmmm, hmmm, hmmm.
You can see the odd comments Obama made, seemingly as an afterthought, about the Ft. Hood Army base massacre at the end of his comments at the Tribal Nation Conference on November 5, 2009. That conference
is a whole other story.

Kudos to President Obama for his concern at least after this:



It's interesting to note that the top Google searches on this story, even three months after the fact, are attributed to none of the major newspaper or television outlets other than FOX and the L.A. Times. No CNN. No ABC, NBC or CBS. Funny, huh?

I'm just wondering...how often would President Obama visit soldiers, or anyone for that matter, after a incident like this when he's out of office? And for that matter, where was Clinton and Carter?

Friday, February 05, 2010

What a Surprise!

Spread the wealth, man. Quick question: How much of their own money would they be willing to give away?

Another Obama Bush-ism

He relies way too much on that darn teleprompter, me thinks. Anyone want to bet the lefty news flunkies don't even mention this?

Thursday, February 04, 2010

Behind Obama's Phony Deficit Numbers & Other Facts You Should Know

Great, informative column by Dick Morris: The real Bush deficit.
Hey Mr. President, what was it that Joe Wilson accurately yelled out at you? Oh yeah...YOU LIE!

More fun from Kevin McCullough.

So it Begins

What's with all this talk lately of impeaching Barack Obama? I mean, clearly I'm not his biggest fan (shocking, I know) but can anyone tell me what he has done, constitutionally speaking, to warrant such an exit from office. I wish he could be. I wish someone found that elusive info on his lack of a public birth certificate (for the record, again, I believe he is an American citizen) so he can be found to be constitutionally removed from office.

He's done a lot of crappy things that no other American president has ever even dreamed of doing (e.g. taking control/ownership of a private company such as General Motors, implenting radical "czars" in positions of power that answer only to him and therefore do not have to appear before Congress-something the Democrat-controlled Congress doesn't mind at all, driving the deficit even farther toward China as he outspends a million women with 10 credit cards each and other bright ideas that he'll answer the American people to in 2012)

But, unfortunately, he hasn't done anything to recieve such a Democrat honor (Andrew Johnson & Bill Clinton-both impeached by the House of Representatives and aquitted by the Senate)
There's always hope, though. But Obama's probably a bit too wiley for that.

Obama Whines to Sympathetic Party Members

So after pulling a draw at the Republican caucus (although not enough Republicans called him on his SOTU rhetoric and untruths) President Barack Obama decided he was safe enough to kvetch about the meeting where he "had fun" at to his own party members.

Parts of this speech (where he was campaigning once again...and again and again) were so outlandish and full of B.S, even Democrats in the room had a hard time believing it. Oh, there was the obligatory pause and applause, but really it's the American public that he has to persuade and he's not doing it very well. Maybe it's because they just don't "get it."

At numerous points he repeatedly blamed George W. Bush for a deficit that he himself has inflated to $1.6 trillion. Which by the way, he'll adjust by printing more money that will simply bring the value of those dollars down to the level of Harry Reid's usefulness.

For a guy who said "the buck stops with me" (a quote by Harry Truman which he can't get right-another missed opportunity for the "objective" press to chastise him for being as "dumb" as Bush)

He keeps on blaming others for his malfeasance. It's not like the Republicans didn't play a part in the economy's collapse (however not as much as Chris Dodd and Barney Fwank) but let's refrain from re-writing history like a typical left-wing whack-job, alright?
  • /* Profile ----------------------------------------------- */ #profile-container { margin:0 0 1.5em; border-bottom:1px dotted #444; padding-bottom:1.5em; } .profile-datablock {