Saturday, March 31, 2012

Stop the Racial Demagoguery

Reprinted from American Thinker.

What would happen if a black man armed with a handgun confronted "suspicious persons" in his neighborhood? What would happen if the "suspicious persons" were unarmed white teens, one of them was shot dead, and the shooter claimed self-defense?

This is not an exercise in mere speculation. We know what would happen in such a case. There would be no white mobs in the street chanting "No justice, no peace!" There would be no whites holding a "million hoodie march" in New York City. There would be no white equivalent of Al Sharpton, the professional race-baiter behind the 1987 Tawana Brawley hoax, leading marches in the streets of the shooter's hometown. There would be no Federal civil rights investigation by the Justice Department. There would be no comments from a president who seems congenitally unable to keep his mouth shut on matters involving left-wing political correctness. And there would be no national media attention from biased, left-wing "reporters."

We know this because in fact, such an event occurred in 2009 in Greece, N.Y., a suburb of Rochester. Roderick Scott, a black man, shot and killed an unarmed white teen, Christopher Cervini, whom he believed was burglarizing a neighbor's car, with a licensed .40 cal. handgun.

There are many similarities between the Scott-Cervini case and the George Zimmerman-Trayvon Martin case in Florida. In both cases, there had been a spate of criminal activity in the neighborhood. In both cases, the shooters called 911 to report suspicious activity, yet chose to confront the unarmed suspects outside their residence and off their own property prior to the arrival of the police. In both cases, the shooters claimed that they felt threatened, and fired in self-defense. In both cases, local law enforcement applied relevant state law.

Unlike Florida, New York does not have a "stand your ground" law. New York law allows a person to use deadly force to defend his residence from home invasion only as a last resort. It does not allow the use of deadly force to prevent a property crime, and requires retreat if possible. Thus, while Zimmerman was not arrested under Florida law, Scott was tried for manslaughter.

New York law does allow a person to use deadly force anywhere, including off his own property, if he feels that his life is in imminent danger and retreat is not possible. Despite the fact that he left his own property, confronted, and shot dead an unarmed white person thought to be committing a petty property crime, Scott was acquitted by a majority-white jury after claiming that the Cervini charged at him, putting him in imminent fear of his life.

Despite the racial difference between the shooter and the decedent, there were no allegations of racial bias. Scott was not charged with a hate crime. There was no Federal civil rights investigation. There were no white protests. The case was settled for what it was: a tragedy caused by a series of poor decisions on behalf of the shooter, and a split-second decision that will forever be second-guessed.

In all probability, the actions of Zimmerman in Florida were also based on a series of poor decisions: the decision to follow a suspect after a police dispatcher told him not to, the decision to confront a suspect with a firearm off his own property, and a split-second decision to shoot an unarmed person when Zimmerman felt his life was in imminent danger, resulting in tragedy. But a tragedy is not necessarily a Federal civil rights case - unless the mobs in the streets and their allies in the media and government want to make it one.

The truth of the matter is that "civil rights" cases are often little more than reverse lynch mobs. In the Old South of the past, white mobs would drag black suspects out of jail and lynch them in the streets if they felt the wheels of justice were turning too slowly. Today, black mobs, often led by the likes of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, lead street protests or riots, and the Federal government comes after white suspects with the "rope" of "civil rights" charges. And just like the old Southern sheriffs with ties to the Klan who turned a blind eye to the illegal actions of whites, the Department of Justice often refuses to act on "civil rights" violations when the perpetrators are black and the victims are white. In the eyes of the Federal government and the political Left, all whites are forever suspected of being gap-toothed Klansmen with shotguns and nooses in their pickup trucks, and all blacks are perpetually innocent, doe-eyed victims of white oppression.

This dynamic was made perfectly clear twenty years ago by the Los Angeles riots. Rodney King, a convicted felon, allegedly intoxicated, led police on a high-speed car chase and resisted arrest when he was finally cornered. Most people agree that the cops gave Rodney a few more licks than department procedures called for. But given King's background and the extenuating circumstances, the cops were acquitted of assault charges under state law. The black population of L.A. erupted in riots that killed 53 people, ignited thousands of arsons, and saw widespread looting. Korean merchants were racially targeted for arson, and resorted to defending their property with arms. Reginald Denny, a hapless white truck driver who inadvertently drove into the riots, was pulled from his vehicle by black rioters who smashed his skull in 91 places with a brick (inflicting far worse injuries than the cops had inflicted on King) and danced a jig over his prone body.

Long before Eric Holder became Attorney General, refused to prosecute black voter intimidation, and referred to blacks as "my people," the Department of Justice caved in to the pressure of the rioters by charging and convicting the L.A. cops with "civil rights" violations and sending them to Federal prison. But no such Federal charges were levied against the blacks who targeted the Koreans and attacked Reginald Denny.

Two years later, O.J. Simpson, a black defendant with a history of domestic violence, was accused of slashing the throats of two white people. But no "civil rights" or "hate crimes" charges were filed against him. No white protests erupted against Simpson or against the black community. Simpson, a black millionaire who had a career in sports, money, and fame that most white people can only dream about, was portrayed as a "victim" of the "racist" police. Blacks from coast to coast whooped and danced with joy when he was acquitted of double murder.

Certainly it's true that in the past, blacks have been victims of whites. But today the reality is quite different from what the street mobs, the government, the media and the P.C. crowd would have us believe. Far from being victims of white oppression, blacks today are disproportionately perpetrators of violent crimes against whites and against other blacks. According to data from the FBI Uniform Crime Reports, in 2009, "whites" -- a category that includes Hispanics -- were known to be responsible for 5,286 murders. Blacks, a mere 13% of the population, were known to be responsible for 5,980 murders. In 2005, the New Century Foundation's "Color of Crime" report found that "Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against blacks. Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are black, and 10 percent are Hispanic. When whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are black" (emphasis mine). Also in 2005, the Department of Justice reported that one-third of rapes committed against white women (approximately 37,000) were perpetrated by blacks, while less than ten -- statistically zero -- rapes of black women were committed by whites.

Whatever happened in the George Zimmerman-Trayvon Martin case, one thing is perfectly clear: it's high time this country quit the racial dog-and-pony show, and judged each criminal case on its individual merits instead of allowing the race-baiting demagogues to leverage each incident for political advantage in the streets and in the media.

Friday, March 30, 2012

Vacation #17 for the Missus

First Lady Michelle Obama and her daughters are on their 17th vacation in the last three years and are enjoying themselves immensely on the taxpayers dime, I'm sure.

"You can't go take a trip to Las Vegas or go down to the Super Bowl on the taxpayer's dime."-President Barack Obama, 2009.

I guess she doesn't either doesn't listen to her husband, or thinks such advice doesn't apply to her. I'm betting on the latter. Either way, judging on all the vacations she takes (because her life is sooooo stressful) she has to be the most relaxed First Lady in history.

Gen 44

Presidential misprint

Thursday, March 29, 2012

More Facts that Show Man-Made Global Warming is Bogus

Tell me something I didn't know.

A new study by a team of scientists at the Syracuse University in New York led by one Zunli Lu has found that the "Medieval Warm Period" from up to 1000 years ago extended all the way down to Antarctica, so the Earth has already experienced "global warming" without humans having anything to do with it.

You won't find this in story in Time or the New York Times I bet.

Where's the Media and Democrat Outrage in This Case?

A third suspect has surrendered to police in the shooting murder of Mississippi State University student John Sanderson.

John who? I'm not surprised you probably don't know who Mr. Sanderson is. Maybe it's because BSNBC, the other liberal media and the White House haven't rushed to judgment on this case and there hasn't been nation-wide vigils in the MSM by race-baiting television personalities and so-called activists. No Congressional hearings scheduled. No civil rights hucksters leading marches.

That's not to say that George Zimmerman (who's a registered Democrat, so that liberal fail-safe mantra of "it's the Republicans fault" is, sadly for them and the said race-baiters at BSNBC, no longer applicable) isn't guilty of this crime, but he's still guaranteed due process. And I'm not attempting to diminish this alleged crime by Zimmerman, but the Nancy Grace-types that like to convict innocent people or put the blame of their crime on a political party that had nothing to do with their decision (*ahem* Jared Loughner) should probably just for once cool their jets and let the justice system, as flawed as it is, do it's due diligence.

But again, why doesn't anyone know or care about the Sanderson case? Or perhaps even the assault on Carter Strange? Or how about Christopher Cervini? The similarities in the last one are eerie. Oh, there's more. Did you know about the double murder of Marine Sgt. Jan Pawel Pietrzak and his wife Quiana Jenkins-Pietrzak that the news tried to frame as simply a burglery gone bad? And of course everyone who cares about journalistic integrity and facts are still waiting for the MSM to nationally report on this evil and grotesque case of Christopher Newsom and Channon Christian. A story that if the perpetrators were white would have never left the airwaves to this day.

Where is the equal-opportunity media lynch mob?

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Santorum Demands Truth from NYT, "Quit Distorting Our Words"

To show that mainstream "journalists" especially those of the New York Slimes (and this completely demonstrates why that names is appropriate-since the reporter simply refuses to listen and will report what he wants) have an agenda, watch this clip of Rick Santorum and NYT reporter Jeff Zeleny. Clearly Zeleny isn't interested in the truth. He's just there to smear and misquote Santorum and get do what his NYT overlords tell him. DESTROY GOP!!!

The right really needs to do this way more often.

Language of the Left

Despite this segment being hosted by Sean Hannity, whom I find to be quite the windbag, even if he does score major points now and again, the findings are interesting if not predictable.

Along with this little debate on why the POTUS and one Bill Maher are complete hypocrites and it's quite provable that Obama agrees with misogyny against right-wing woman or at the very least, he's quite the misogynist himself.

Saturday, March 24, 2012

The Problem with Obama

Well, two of many, many, many...

Wait, were all those leaders in the White House on the same day? Is it some kind of European tour? Like a school field trip? Maybe someone can be actually stuck on stupid.

Well, he did throw his own "typical white" grandmother under the bus. Who would be surprised about a "War on the Elderly?"

Apparently Rush Limbaugh Killed Trayvon Martin

At the moonbat school of liberal moral relativism, Sarah Palin was responsible for the near-fatal shooting of Gabriel Giffords (and indeed fatal shootings of six people, including a nine-year-old girl), newt Gingrich is responsible for the murder of a British teenager for saying, " President Obama is the most effective food stamp president in American history" and Rush Limbaugh is responsible for the shooting of Trayvon Martin. Oh, and also Rick Santorum and Mitt Romney.

Of course Limbaugh did not give birth to the term "magic negro,"

140 Cities Across the U.S. to Protest Obama Administration's Sterilization, Abortifacient, and Contraception Mandate, Will Media Report?

The MSM simply couldn't get enough of the Occupy hippies and anarchists. They loved them so much (and continue to, although since all the rapes and murders no one on the left is really calling them their own anymore) they dedicated no less than 33 stories to them in the first week and a half on their morning and prime-time news broadcasts. The fools at BSNBC advocated their "cause" so much that I thought adoption papers were being drawn up.

But yet, as of noon yesterday, not one of the three major networks had allotted a single second to the planned demonstrations in 140 cities across the U.S. to rally against the Obama administration's sterilization, abortifacient (yeah, I had to go to the dictionary for that one) and contraception mandate.

When the Occupy protests started, NBC anchor Brian Williams could hardly contain his personal glee when he called the "movement," a "massive protest movement" that "could well turn out to be the protest of this current era," while ABC's Diane Sawyer castigated the Tea Party's arrival as "out-of-control marauders, roaming Washington, some of them increasingly emotional, yelling slurs and epithets." CBS's Bob Schieffer also showed his disdain for the Tea Party when he compared them to racists wanting to keep civil rights apartheid alive, accusing them of hurling "racial epithets" and "sexual slurs." saying "One lawmaker said it was like a page out of a time machine.''

With the networks history of everything Occupy (except the truth about their disgusting and easily produced documented atrocities) don't bet on the Stand Up Coalition being reported on favorably, if at all.

Friday, March 23, 2012

Joe Biden...Comedian

The Vice-President gaffe machine was at it again.

Does this guy ever run out of material?

Tea Party Activists Dump Feces and Urine in ATM and Down a Flight of Stairs

Oh wait. It wasn't the Tea Party. It was the Occupy weenies. My mistake. The two groups are so similar, says Barack Obama.

Obama on Solyndra: "This Was Not Our Program"

It's not exactly the same as "it's Bush's fault," but it may as well be. President Barack Obama, perhaps realizing his loan to the failing energy company Solyndra (that even the lowest-level employee knew was going to bottom out) will, along with all his other many failures, hurt his chances for re-election. He is now stating that the loan guarantee was "not our program."
If you remember, Obama had earlier stated that a deal to finance a $535 million federal loan guarantee to Solyndra predates his presidency. So again, nothing can be traced back to him and his record of denying any wrong-doing, at least according to him, stays intact. He's still the perfect human being.

NYPD: Iranian Spies Have Conducted "Hostile Reconnaissance" in NYC

It appears Iranian spies have taken steps for a retaliatory cause in case the West decides to embark on a pre-emptive strike to take out nuclear facilities in the hostile Muslim country. According to the New York Post, the Iranians "have conducted 'hostile reconnaissance' of New York City landmarks and infrastructure on at least six occasions since 2002."

Well This Is Certainly A Surprise

Would anyone be surprised to learn that American-born al-Qaeda adviser Adam Gadahn hated FOX News and praised MSNBC, ABC, CBS, and CNN? Much like the extreme left that loves to chant "FOX Lies!" at every given opportunity, it seems they have even more in common with al-Qaeda terrorists that, like them, would love to see great harm come to America and the West.

Yep. Fox News. al-Qaeda's least favorite news source.

Thursday, March 22, 2012

Another False Claim in Obama Propaganda Film

First it was the claim that GM (Government Motors) had fully repaid their bailout "loan" that was shown to be about miscued by about $25 billion. Now the filmmakers flubbed again by re-introducing an already debunked story about President Obama's mother's health insurance.

Much like the lies in Micheal Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11 and Al Gore's an Inconvenient Truth, the exposing of misrepresentations and all-out fabrications will be forthcoming.

The True "Face" of Liberal Hollywood

It seems Hollywood elitist and flame-thrower Tom Hanks doesn't mind palling around with other liberal racists that wear black-face, afro-wigs and carry around a toy gorilla, then when asked about it says he was "blind-sided." He stands around for 20 minutes soliciting for other "progressive's" money all in the name of the children. He stands side by side with the man in question, James Montgomery, jokes with him, obviously aware of his presence and choice of "costume," and has the nerve to say he was blind-sided?

Prediction. Not only will Hanks or Montgomery face any backlash, but their actions will be whole-heartedly defended by his left-wing, hypocritical, closet-racist buddies. Watch for apologists like David Letterman, Chris Matthews, the hens on The View, all of the morning shows and all liberals in between defend this with everything their little liberal double-standard manuals tell them. Or they may even ignore it all together. It's 50-50 right now.

Watch the contrast between this and how the left "handled" the Rush Limbaugh apology. How much groveling do you think Hanks will have to do or how many sponsors will HBO lose? (He is after all a producer of the Sarah Palin B.S. hit-piece, Game Change) Much like Robert DeNiro's racist "joke"-“Callista Gingrich. Karen Santorum. Ann Romney,” De Niro said. “Now do you really think our country is ready for a white first lady?” Although White House spokeswoman and DeNiro himself apologized for it, Hanks is safe inside his liberal bubble.

And the beat goes on.

Liberal Arrogance Knows No Bounds

Check out these stories on how liberal politicians have the greatest economic and military minds since, well, ever. Forget for a moment that these quotes and stories are about and by men that not only are not economic or military experts and have not written one law or fired one bullet; but are their own best sources for their brilliance. Who are the stars of today's "worship us at the liberal alter?" Why none other than fiscal demi-god Paul "I Forever Make Up My Own History" Begala and the biggest brainiac Vice-President to ever grace the White House himself, Joe "What am I talkin' about?" Biden setting up President Barack Obama as the supposed "most 'audacious' military planner in 500 years."

The best retort to that was left by some of the Politico commentors:

"The Normandy Invasion. The landing on Inchon. The battle for Dien Bien Phu. They were planned and executed by some dim bulb generals who just got lucky. The Special Ops and intel teams that tracked OBL for years were just gumshoes waiting for a hot tip and orders from the most brilliant statesman, warrior and energy visionary in the past five centuries. Biden is the former chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee so he is very savvy about such things. In fact, Susan Sarandon, Tom Hanks and Sean Penn probably agree with him."

"Leon Panetta gave an Interview with PBS on May 2nd, 2011 explaining that nobody in the situation room was able to see the Bin Laden Hit because of a 25 minute Blackout while the Seals were inside his Compound. The only man who saw Bin Laden alive would have been the Navy Seal who shot him. What began as a questionable Raid quickly became suspect by conflicting stories from Biden, Obama and Leon Panetta for days to follow.
Obama refused to allow any images of the deceased Bin Laden to be released to the Media. Obama claims it was a move intended to not anger Muslims Worldwide. If Muslims were not already angered for Bin Laden being assassinated by the USA, then an image of Bin Laden dead will not upset them.

I find it odd Biden brings this up at this time. Multiple requests have been made under the Freedom of Information Act for Bin Ladens file that has Images, his death certificate, e-mails and Videos from his assassination at his compound. During the week of 3/12/2012 the Pentagon announced that the entire Osama file has been lost and is no longer available through the FOIA. This is factual, look it all up.

If Joe Biden claims that the Bin Laden Assassination is the most "Audacious Plan" in 500 years, then how in Gods name has this Administration Lost their evidence to prove that this "Questionable" chain of events ever occurred in the first place?"

I think Noel Sheppard did a pretty good job in separating liberal fiction from actual historical fact. I knew a few of the players involved in the budget-balancing of the 90s such as Lloyd Bentsen, Ron Brown, William Daley, Norm Mineta and Robert Reich, but admittedly was unaware of the rest. I certainly didn't know of Begala's apparent input.

And what can you say about Biden? Nothing he doesn't say for all of us.

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

MSNBC Political Analyst Suspended for calling Obama “A Dick” on the Air

2012 Lib-think, media style. Don't ever, EVER insult the president on MSNBC. At least not the all-powerful OBAMA-MAN. Republican presidents? Have at it.

So Obama is called a "dick" and BSNBC brass goes apesh*t. Ed Schultz calls Laura Ingram a "slut" and all is well. Ah. I see.

Top 20 Tweets of Obama Presidential (Not So) Facts

Another Obama history gaffe, another non-story for the MSM. Don't worry, they'll get around to it. They'll blame Bush or FOX News or say Sarah Palin said it, or whatever.

But just for fun, here's some pretty good shots at the gaffe itself.

My favourite: "After his term ended, Thomas Jefferson ran a successful dry cleaning business."

Obama’s History Lesson

Who's to Blame?

Bush, FOX, what's the difference? Oh and the corporate executives he "saved" as well. Forget the unions and lobbyists.

In a way he is right. Without one hundred percent complicity from the media there is no way this guy can attain his goal of fooling all of the people all of the time. How dare Roger Ailes create a dissenting news channel to the left's State-run-like "news?"

What If the Left is Just One Big Astroturf?

Freshman Republican to Democrats: Present a Budget or I’ll Shut This Place Down

Freshman Republican Ron Johnson had some harsh but due words for the Senate Democrats.
I want to see him follow through just to see the left-wing media say how un-American he is and how un-constitutional his "grandstanding" is. With no mention of how right he is of course.

Dutch Officially Abandon Multiculturalism

Somebody's leaders finally woke up to the totalitarianism disguised as "the religion of peace."
Who has the guts to follow suit?

No more extra subsidies for Muslim immigrants, no more burqas, no more forced marriages. In other words, no more lunacy.

An excerpt from the integration bill's covering letter and 15-page action plan:
"A more obligatory integration is justified because the government also demands that from its own citizens. It is necessary because otherwise the society gradually grows apart and eventually no one feels at home anymore in the Netherlands. The integration will not be tailored to different groups."

Dutch Interior Minister Piet Hein Donner: "It is not the government's job to integrate immigrants."

Right to Lawful Assembly A Crime

Yep. Goodbye first amendment.

Only three "Nay" votes, all Republican. Every Democrat voted to limit your freedom of speech. Although the fact that the House is Republican-controlled does not elude me. However, not one Dem voted against this.

A clearly bi-partisan dismantling of rights. Although thought of as "very minor and uncontroversial," and "does not infringe the first amendment," I beg to differ. I am certainly not a Constitutional lawyer, but does this sound like it doesn't keep you from lawful assembly?


Leading by Example?

Theatre of the Absurd..."Encore!"

Apparently if your involved with the Tea Party, all you have to do to get bad press from the left-wing media is simply exist. Go to rallies, speak your mind, be totally inclusive and non-violent; oh, and clean up after yourselves. Not to mention actually make a difference politically.
To get good news from the same left-wing media establishment is advocate anti-Semitism, violence, anarchy, destruction of private property, rape and murder. Then for good measure, defecate and urinate on public streets. Then the MSM will fall in love with you and champion your every move.

Occupy Arrests Are Good News For The Movement

Is anybody, I mean anybody getting this?

Critical Race Theory Advocated by Obama Administration

No surprise here, given his U.S. Attorney dropping a clear cut case of voter intimidation, blaming white police officers for arresting a black man who, although was temporarily living there but couldn't prove he was at the time, calling them "stupid," sitting through 20 years of Jeremiah Wright's racist, anti-Semitic, anti-American tirades and most recently telling the students of Harvard in the 90s to "open your hearts and minds" to Derrick Bell. Now it turns out Bell's racialism is being taught, with the full advocacy of the White House.

Sunday, March 18, 2012

Micheal Moore Called Out on His Opportunism & Hypocrisy

Opie and Anthony discuss the scumbag and insincere Micheal Moore about his trolling the Occupy crowds to drum up more book and film sales.
I'm not a fan of these guys by any means. In fact I've honestly never even heard their voices before this clip, but I had to post it. I have no idea how old it is. I assume it was around the time Moore tried to recruit the Occupy hippie crowd in Portland, Oregon as to not hate him making over $5o million a year and still wanting more money...their money.

Listen to not only Moore's B.S, but to the discussion of the Occupy tactics.


OMG: Marting Brashear Pwned by Colleague Ratigan

If I didn't see it I wouldn't have believed it.

Then again Dylan Ratigan is the same man who once said, addressing the Occupy Washington crowd, "You should all be very proud of yourselves!"

Thursday, March 15, 2012

What and Who Do You Support?

President Barack Obama supports the teachings and philosopy of one Derrick Bell, when he said "Open your hearts and your minds" just before introducing and hugging the late Harvard professor. Bell in turn, supported Louis Farrakhan and Khalid Muhammad of the Nation of Islam. Farrakhan, in case you didn't know said:

Derrick Bell in 1984: “We should really appreciate the Louis Farrakhans and the Khalid Muhammads while we’ve got them.”

And Obama is the man you voted to lead your country and want to do again? Um, tell me again who the dangerous, divisive racists are?

The Good "Reverand" at His Best

I give you the "Best" of Al Sharpton. Well, maybe not the best, since this compelation is missing his "diamond merhants" and "punk faggot" tirades, but this is why I call him "the biggest racist on the planet."

Well, y'know, he's no Rush Limbaugh.

Although, and I can't believe I'm saying this, but to be completely honest, I think I can understand his "cracker" explanation.
But unfortunately any credibility with me at that little clarification goes down the tubes when he says it about any white person...which is all the time.

Vermont Wants Investigation Into O'Keefe, Not Exposed Voter Fraud

Say what you want about conservative videographer James O'Keefe, but even the most ardent lefty has to admit this is just loopy.

Chris Matthews Calls Santorum and Romney "Cultists"

Left-wing host and perennial moonbat Chris "Thrillboy" Matthews mocked Southern Republican voters Tuesday on his his BSNBC show, the laughingly entitled Hardball, when he said about GOP presidential candidates Rick Santorum and Mitt Romney, "They've got three RCs, or two RCs- two Roman Catholics- running and a Mormon, so three cultists running, and they gotta pick one of the three cultists, as they see them."

So not only are Roman Catholics and Mormons cultists, Republican Southerners are stupid? I guess you can add this left-wing flame-throwing and hatred for those in the Bible-belt along with that of liberal radio-show host Mike Malloy, Rhandi Rhodes and Bill Maher.

Those pleasant and tolerant, tolerant liberals, huh?

Lubbock Planned Parenthood CEO Arrested for Indecent Exposure

Telling. Via

Chris Rock Goes Berzerk on Camerawoman

Forget yet another example liberal misogamy, and a violent one at that; what the hell is wrong with asking the dude about explaining a bit more about an ignorant statement he made? What makes a guy go ballistic when asked to explain an innocent question about his beliefs?

Via NewsBusters:

"Mattera’s two-minute video of Rock was first posted at, and it features a promotion for his book, Hollywood Hypocrites: The Devastating Truth About Obama’s Biggest Backers, along with the scuffle. The fireworks don’t last too long because the camera is quickly disabled, allegedly because Rock “chucks it 50 feet,” according to Mattera.
The video, begins with text of a quote from the comedian likening the Tea Party to “racism” and calling its participants “insane.” Mattera is seen as a fan in cordial conversation with Rock until Mattera asks about the Tea Party, at which point Rock walks away but then turns around and appears to grab the video camera.“He attacked my camerawoman,” Mattera said. “Oh, yeah, it was a funny sight to see. He was lunging at me but his bodyguards were blocking him. He was acting all big and bad with his bodyguards between us.”

This is left-wing intolerance run amok to say the least. And these are the Obama backers that say the right and the Tea Party are racist and violent while the occupy hippies are patriots and mainstream?
OR...maybe it's just simple indiscriminate racism?

I think someone should get Mr. Rock a nice fruit basket.

You Gotta Be Kidding Me!

I never heard of him. But a sportswriter at Yahoo named Graham Watson seems to think that, one, when Mississippi Valley State guard Kevin Burwell, by his own admission during a game between Mississippi valley State and Western Kentucky during the NCCA Final Four basketball tournament on Tuesday, "gestured happily toward President Barrack Obama in the front row," according to CBS; Graham considered it a "taunt." First of all, who cares?!

Secondly, it was reciprocation from Burwell for the president mockingly stating that both teams first-half shooting was "terrible."

"We were just trying to put on a show for him," Burwell said. "At the same time, we was just up for this game. In the heat of the moment, I just pointed at him a couple times. That's it."

Third, the president of the universe can mess you up. After Western Kentucky made a comeback, Watson felt magnanimous enough to write,

"However, what Burwell didn't know at the time was that simple taunt would kick off a MVSU downward spiral than no one could have ever predicted. Even though Mississippi Valley State jumped out to a 16-point lead, Western Kentucky whittled away at it in the final five minutes and ultimately won the game 59-58.

After Burwell made that fateful shot, he scored four points, but had three turnovers, a missed layup and three missed 3-pointers, including one with three seconds remaining that would have won the game.

... Not saying the president had anything to do with this cosmic karma, but you have to wonder. He is, after all, the most powerful man in the world."

So not only can Obama walk on water and heal the sick, he can put a voodoo curse on someone from just glaring at them.

Wow. Maybe the Republicans shouldn't mess with this guy after all. Check out Serpent and the Rainbow if you don't believe me.

Wednesday, March 14, 2012

Really? No Kidding

Next they'll tell us that water is wet. Do we really need a study to tell us that liberals are less tolerant?

Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Ed Schultz "Pours Gasoline All Over His Fire" of Lies About Palin

Sgt. Schultz is at it again. Seriously, I can't for the life of me figure out why he hasn't been taken to the woodshed a la Jason Blair for his repeated, easily provable and malicious lies. Once again he's gone after his favorite target Sarah Palin for who he says is responsible for "ginning up hatred in this country."

Schultz started by showing his tiny audience a poll result by Public Policy Polling that shows the citizens of Mississippi and Alabama think that President Obama is a Muslim by a percentage score of 52 per cent to 45 per cent, respectively. He then chastised Palin for the causation of these numbers because of a scene in the misinformation-filled HBO film, Game Change that had Julianne Moore as Palin asked Woody Harrelson (Steve Schmidt) if she could start talking about Rev. Jeremiah Wright and domestic terrorist Bill Ayers. Harrelson told her to speak with McCain (Ed Harris). What Schultz didn’t show his viewers (as per his usual Michael Moore school of manipulative editing and omission) was that in the film, the campaign team discussed Palin's request and it was decided by McCain himself that Wright would be completely hands off, but Ayers would be free game. There was absolutely nothing in Game Change about the McCain campaign attacking Obama's religious beliefs, which is one of the few truths in an otherwise blatant misrepresentation of history that is this Palin hit piece.

So yeah, He chose to use a fictional bio-pic as a source of information and then relay that to his audience. That should give you a small sense of his "journalistic" know-how. He then went on to show a clip of Obama in a 2008 stump speech saying, "When we start using religion as a bludgeon in politics, when we start questioning other people's faith, we start using religion to divide instead of bring the country together, then I think we've got a problem."

To no one's surprise, Schultz didn't pick up on the irony.

The Sarge then went on his high-horse with this little quip, "Sarah Palin poured gasoline all over this fire. She helped start the misinformation campaign." The main problem with that little opinion (which I'm sure he stayed up all thinking of) is that it was, as everyone should know by now, Hillary Clinton's campaign that leaked a photo of Barack Hussein Obama in Muslim garb during the 2008 primaries. Palin would not even be announced as John McCain's running mate for another six months. But as Schultz has proved time and time again, facts don't matter to him. The only thing that does is slandering and demonizing conservatives, especially conservative women, anyway he can.

This is how the MSM will use Game Change. Much like quotes attributed to Rush Limbaugh that were never uttered by him (that were originally published on Wikipedia, the great bastion of journalistic resource) quotes by Tina Fey attributed to Palin that she never said and other misquoted or made up things liberals use against Republicans and Conservatives all the time. Again, it amazes me that NBC Universal has no interest in reporting the facts. Sometimes I really wonder if the NBC brass just keep hacks like Schultz, Rachel Maddow, Chris Matthews and Al Sharpton on the air so they can laugh at them with their wives over a late dinner. I know I do.

At least he wasn't audacious and smug enough, at least on this night, to claim a whopper of a fallacy like one of his partners in crime, the aforementioned Maddow had the gall to.
Still, give him time. Maybe one day he'll accidentally get something right.

Sunday, March 11, 2012

Huffington Post's Makarechi Opines Van Susteren Can't Take A "Joke"

It's never going to end with these left-wing hypocrites. I expect hacks like Bill Maher and Priorities USA founder Bill Burton to try and defend the left-wing misogynistic ideals with their lame excuse that there's no legitimate analogy between Rush Limbaugh and Maher or Ed Schultz, Montel Williams, Mike Malloy et al. But coming from a woman, even a liberal woman, you would think was a grown-up and one who I would think would want to be taken as a serious professional would not make excuses for anyone maliciously offending her gender and would not slough off valid accusations from anyone, let alone another woman.

FOX News personality Greta Van Susteren recently voiced her opinion of Louis C.K. delivering a Congressional Correspondents Dinner speech seeing that he is another man with no sensibilities and made crude and disgusting comments about Sarah Palin. The fact that he was even invited says those overseeing the guest list don't care to much about conservative sensibilities. C.K. has since voluntarily withdrawn from the dinner.But according to Kia Makarechi-once again-because C.K. is a comedian, he is immune to criticism.

"C.K.'s take-no-prisoners brand of stand up comedy apparently rubs Van Susteren the wrong way." C.K. is a comedian you see and no one should find him offensive. If he was a conservative radio show host, then he would be open to criticism and calls for censorship.

HuffPo is not the only left-wing paper or website to show no interest in left-wing double-standards when it comes to the treatment of conservative women. As usual, the New York Times, although reported the story of C.K. and Van Susteren, didn't tell people what he said of Palin. One doesn't have to type the quote in verbatim, but a more information would be forthcoming.

The defense of the left on behalf of people like Maher, C.K., Schultz, Malloy, Williams and the rest of their ilk is to say the right has "fake anger, false analogies, no sense of humor, are out of and are out of touch without admitting to or even acknowledging their own behavior; then have the audacity to ignore legitimate concerns and go on to repeat their callous and innocuous, arrogant behavior.

Then again, why am I surprised? It's got nothing to do with man versus woman, or what's right versus what's wrong. It's got to do with right versus left. It's quite clear that a liberal man or woman can say anything they want about a conservative woman. They have no one on the left, including their peers, their bosses and now their government to stop them from their hatred, jealousy and delusional temperament. They have no one to hold them accountable aside from those on the right who they just disregard and demonize.

Come Off It is Right

Piers Morgan (known to bask in the Obama light himself)asked Obama propaganda filmmaker Davis Guggenheim — the man behind the new very pro-Barack Obama documentary The Road We’ve Traveled — on the lack of balance in his film. The CNN crew must have had to mop up the puddles of drool from Guggenheim...and perhaps some other bodily secretions in the vein of Chris Matthews.

The negative was too many positives? This is the epitome of the Obama-loving media front and center for the world to see and the left to ignore. My God! Just wait till BSNBC gets this guy on their sets. They'll no doubt want to raise a statue in his honor. But not one as big as Obama's of course.

Wikileaks Pushes Conspiracy Theory

Stratfor, a US-based intelligence firm has had e-mails hacked by the group Anonymous, which "successfully attacked one of the firm’s servers. More than 5 million emails were apparently stolen," according to the website RT. Stratfor "relies on paid tips from informants placed in high circles of business, government and security all around the world." The hacker group claims the body of Al-Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden was not buried at sea.

But before anybody get their panties in a wad (especially the Loose Change geeks that are probably frothing at the mouth reading this in anticipation of another screwy conspiracy movie) the emails hacked is allegedly from Fred Burton, Stratfor’s vice-president for intelligence. But if you read the article correctly, Burton is merely theorizing about the fate of bin Laden's body (which I also believe was not dumped into the sea. bin Laden is most certainly dead, but I find it hard to believe they would have given him any respectful Muslim ceremony. I think his body is in the hands of the U.S. government. I have no proof what-so-ever and I'm not suggesting anything, it's just a hunch) Burton, "believes" the body was "bound for Dover." If the e-mail quotes are accurate, he says "If body dumped at sea, which I doubt, the touch is very Adolph Eichman like. The Tribe did the same thing with the Nazi's ashes."

So let's not start demanding an investigation into the SEALs just yet.

Being A "Funny" Misogynist Seems to Be the Consensus for Immunity

This is getting old. I'm tired of hearing this bullsh*t and I'm sure you're tired of hearing it from the right and myself. But the case will not die until someone from the left, someone that can be considered a spokesperson for the left, speaks out and actually says that Bill Maher said and continues to say, exactly or worse than what Rush Limbaugh said.

Here we have yet another in a long, unapologetic line of left-wing misogynistic-loving robots that simply refuses to say Maher is just as guilty.

Priorities USA founder (and former Obama spokesman) Bill Burton on Andrea Mitchell Live on Thursday: "...the notion that there's an equivalence between what a comedian has said over the course of his career, and what the de facto leader of the Republican Party said to sexually degrade a woman who engaged in an important debate of our time, is crazy. But there`s just no similarity between what Rush Limbaugh said, lying about the argument that Miss Fluke was making, a law student at Georgetown, and what -- and what a comedian has said in the past."

When is this "comedian" defense ever going to be exposed and/or admitted by the left that is a pathetic, hollow excuse? I'll try and not to turn blue holding my breath.

Oh, and if Limbaugh is the "de facto leader" of the GOP, does that make Bill Maher and Jon Stewart co-de facto leaders of the Democrat Party?

By the way, you can add Montel Williams to the list of hate-mongering misogynists (and maybe racist as well?) after defending his suicide wish on Michelle Bachmann. Yet he talks about respect and name-calling.

There's that "joke" excuse again. Are you picking up on the pattern here?

Charles Krauthammer Sums It Up

"When I hear a denunciation on the left, I'll expect one on the right."
That's it. That's all I've been saying. If you let Bill Maher and Mike Maloy and Ed Schultz and all the rest of the hate-mongers and real misogynists on the left get away with it time after time, then simply shut up about those on the right. End of story.

Saturday, March 10, 2012

MSNBC Still Protecting Their Favorite Son

Well, second favorite. We all know who their first is.
But as expected when challenged on their hypocrisy (not that it was challenged by any employee of this misogynist-leading network, but from the right) the apologists and acolytes for Bill Maher still refuse to admit his past (and future) comments about Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachmann are just as bad and indeed worse than Rush Limbaugh's could ever be.

"Sandra Fluke is not a public person." Uh, she is most certainly is now after putting herself in the spotlight with not only her panhandling for taxpayer money for her and her friend's sexual escapades, but with her appearance on The View. I don't know of too many private people who go on national television.

Martin Brasher: "Diversion, make believe, victim-hood and insults. And they think Bill Maher is a bad guy."

What a pathetic chowderhead. Chalk Brashear up as another women-hater. The war on conservative women marches on. In perfect goose-step formation.

Zo and the Liberal Demand for Taxpayer Subsidized Sex

Man, I love this guy.

Top 10 Lies of Game Change

I probably won't watch HBO's Game Change. Not because I know it's just yet another bed of lies attacking Sarah Palin (the proof is simply the fact that the authors of the book and writers of the movie didn't even bother to interview Palin, John McCain or anyone that they skewered (says most that have seen a preview) had any real inside knowledge of the 2008 campaign. Plus I have btter things to do like putting up shelves and re-arranging my den. Plus, the last thing HBO produced that held any interest for me was The Sopranos, so their average in the last five years is to be desired.

But someone that has seen the film says it's nothing more than a left-wing hatch-job that was to be expected for a people that had no interest in doing any kind of sincere research or telling a objective story and listed the top 10 lies in the movie.

The "Palin" character in the movie "is nothing more than a left-wing day dream of who they (the left) wish Palin was." I like that. And judging by the left-wing discussions of the woman hardly any of them have even once met, I'd say that's a pretty accurate statement.

More Sowell on Bell

Thomas Sowell was on Hannity to discuss the radical racialist and Obama mentor, the late Derrick Bell. He doesn't do too many interviews, so when he does I'm always sure to catch him. It's always a pleasure to hear his thoughts.

Friday, March 09, 2012

Welcome Back Joe

Well, this might just be a freebie for you lefties out there. Or maybe not. Samuel Wurzelbacher, aka "Joe the Plumber," who we haven't really seen since the 2008 general election when he asked a question that made then-candidate Barack Obama state that he wanted to "spread the wealth" (without giving some of his own campaign contributions to John McCain to make things more "fair") is running for Congress. In his interview on CNN with last night with Zoraida Sambolin, he pretty much exposed what the media should have asked Barack Obama when he ran for the Illinois State Senate. Sambolin asked things like "[What] qualifies you to run for Congress?" His answer was actually pretty suave and he didn't stumble like Sambolin probably thought he would, or hoped. Well, just watch and see how he handled a so-called journalist that was really only interested in his creating an alleged smear of minorities by Wurzelbacher. And since when is a news network supposed to champion any group?

Yep. He had about as much experience running for office as the current U.S. President when he was a so-called "community organizer." Actually more so, since Wurzelbacher actually had a real jobs as well.

Like Clockwork

Just as I said they would in a post yesterday, the MSM has begun to defend President Barack Obama's close association with racist and demagogue Harvard professor Derrick Bell. And they're doing it exactly as I said, sloughing it off as a non-story:

Gee, what's next? What other out-of-the-blue seer-type predictions will I be able to conjure? Let's see. Perhaps the MSM will call's editors racist?

Thursday, March 08, 2012

Don't Feed the Animals

Still No Apology from Karzai for 76 Murdered Coalition Troops

Obama at Protest for Radical Racialist Professor

Although this isn't new footage (snippets of it first appeared on PBS' documentary, "The Choice 2008,") a lot of people may not have seen it, but it has been selectively edited to hide what must be truly damaging.

It shows Barack Obama praising and hugging controversial racialist professor Derrick Bell, a close associate to another close figure in Obama's life, Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Bell once said that "White Americans would sell black Americans into slavery to aliens to relieve the national debt, and that Jews would go along with it." This is the man that the current President of the United States wanted folks to "Open your hearts and your minds" to.

But don't worry Obama acolytes, the media while not ignoring it, will slough it off as nothing.
BuzzFeed's Ben Smith has already started. There will be plenty more.
But it must have worried people like Charles Ogletree, Barack Obama's mentor, who said "We hid this throughout the 2008 campaign. I don't care if they find it now" Which says that they were fearful it would damage Obama.
This is hopefully just a taste of what has in store.

Add to that Thomas Sowell's ascertainment of Bell.

Oakland Sues Occupyer for Damages

Remind me. Has anyone attempted to sue any Tea Party people for assault, robbery, theft or vandalism? How about a charge for simple littering? No?
Are you Occupy supporters getting it yet?

Schakowsky and Jackson-LeeRefuse To Condemn Maher

Democrat Congresswomen Jan Schakowsky and Sheila Jackson Lee refused to condemn liberal talk-show host, woman-hater and Obama-donor Bill Maher when given the chance after she did just that to Rush Limbaugh when Maher has said much worse and on more occasions.

Surprised by this obvious and tactless non-response? Me neither.

Matthews Attacks Kids at Romney Event

Chris Tingle attacked children at a Mitt Romney rally, asking if this was reminiscent of North Korea.

Besides the fact that Matthews would know a thing or two about supporting dictator-led nations, wasn't it his network and Matthews in particular that cheer-leaded the singing of children praising Obama to "Change the World?"

I mean, seriously, this guy is just way to easy to ridicule for his outright Obama-lovin' hypocrisy. Doesn't he realize how much of an in-the-tank tool he is? I don't think he's actually denied saying it's his "job" to get Obama re-elected, but he has still tried to make people believe he's objective. It's just getting too simple. Don't even get me started on Chuck Todd, Matthew's little left-hand biatch.

Conservative Civil Liberties Group Calling for Congressional Oversight Hearings on Alleged IRS Harassment of Tea Party Groups

Tea Party groups that have filed for "tax-exempt" status are allegedly being harassed by the IRS for doing nothing that other political groups have done in the past with no such intimidation.

Are You F-ing Kidding Me?

"The only question I have when it comes to President Obama and Israel is whether he is the most pro-Israel president in history or just one of the most," Obama apologist and obvious glue-sniffer Thomas Friedman said in his most recent New York Times column.

Is it any wonder the Times circulation numbers are shrinking more and more? I'd like to point out something to Friedman, if you think that Republican support of Israel is merely to garner Jewish votes instead of about protecting the most democratic and best ally in the Middle East then you're more of an irrelevant imbecile than anyone could have ever thought. Also, the "Palestinians" are an invented people. I won't for the umpteenth time explain why that is so. If you really fell the need to be educated, simply crack a book and read some history.
Although Obama my have made some valid points in his speech, he has done everything in his power to de-legitimize Israel at every turn. So to try and sound like he's doing anything for Israels' benefit is purely self-serving and hollow.

So the only question I have pertaining to Friedman is whether he's the biggest moron on the planet or just one of the most.

Want Some "Moore" Hypocrisy from the Left?

Chris"Thrill Up My Leg" Matthews, the BSNBC meat-head that hosts *ahem* Hardball (only on conservatives) said on "Morning Joe" this morning that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu should stay out of American elections. I wonder if he would say that if Netwnyahu were a big liberal and supporter of Obama (we all already know the obvious answer to that one) and moreover, I wonder why he didn't tell that to his good, beefy friend Micheal Moore? I guess it since it's because Moore only tried to interfere in another country's elections once. Oh! Wait a minute not so fast.

Ah well, what does that mean Tingle anyway? It's only his non-existent credibility.

Oh, and by the way, thanks to Moore to for calling us stupid.
"You have a parliamentary system (I'll bet you didn't know that -- see, that's why you need Americans telling you things!)"
Yes. We need you're help in actually telling us what our system of government is based on. You condescending piece of crap!

And, yes, I do realize it's an old column. But really, is it any less old than "It's Bush's fault!"

See, It's All About the "Humor"

For a guy who didn't want to blog about any of this Limbaugh/Fluke crap that really does mean absolutely nothing in the big picture, I'm sure getting into it a bit too much. But, since I already started...

Some left-wing loon of a, I guess, comedian, Pete Dominick was on CNN last night to of course defend Bill Maher and once again defend liberal misogamy against conservative women because Maher is a "comedian" and humor to the left is always their get-out-of-jail-free card.

Apparently Maher gets a pass because, and see if you can follow this, Limbaugh's insults were "literal," while Maher's "were just gender-based." To her credit, host Kyra Phillips challenged Dominick by saying, "...Bill Maher stepped away from the comedic role when he donated $1 million to [Obama's] super PAC." Dominick challenged that point by scrambling with, "The more important point is, how influential is Bill Maher's money on politics?" As if Maher doesn't have influence on the left. Uninformed and ignorant as they may be, people on the left still listen to Maher's opinion and take them as fact. And his money goes a long way in aiding President Obama re-election campaign.

What his ludicrous statements in defending Maher's statements in 2001 have to do with anything is beyond me.
And his quip at the end of the interview also befuddles me. So now men also benefit from contraceptives? I guess non-users and religious institutions should be forced to pay birth-control for men to.
That's not silly. Its 'a "joke."

Wednesday, March 07, 2012

Just A Reminder

With all the time and energy the media is putting into the "Great National Crisis" that is the Rush Limbaugh "story," may I remind you there are greater threats going on?

Such as...

That is all.

Maher "Defends" Limbaugh

"Defends" because he knows the sharks are circling and isn't quite as brave as he lets on. I guess "having no sponsors" (which is quite the eye-opener seeing as I didn't know HBO doesn't have sponsors) isn't quite the shield he wants everyone to think it is.

Maher opted on Twitter: "Hate to defend Rush Limbaugh but he apologized, liberals looking bad for not accepting. Hate intimidation by sponsor pullout."

Dana Loesch has a pretty good take on my above thought.

Another Georgetown Student Answers Fluke

How much do you want to bet that Angela Morabito doesn't get a guest spot on The View or a "good job!" phone call from President Obama? I'm willing to bet however someone like misogynist Ed Schultz or the vile Rhandi Rhodes (because she's a fellow woman after all and is allowed to verbally defile another female) will take their shots at her.

President Defends Call to Fluke

President Barack Obama held a White House press conference to explain his reason for calling Sandra Fluke.

Now I have a question. Why didn't he answer the question about liberal talkers engaging in such inflammatory rhetoric? He may have as the video ended abruptly as you can see. Also the video didn't have Obama "attack Rush" as the title indicated from where I embedded it. So maybe he did, although based on this president's history, I doubt it due it not being politically expedient. Since he did accept a $1, 000, 000 donation from Bill Maher, one of the liberal flame-throwers in question who continuously attacks Sarah Palin (doesn't she stand up for what she believes in that Obama clearly doesn't agree with?) I doubt he would bite one of the big hands that feeds him. If he did comment on the question on behalf of right-wingers and those like Maher and Mike Malloy, Ed Schultz, Matt Taibbi, etc, is he now going to give back the donation to Maher? Will he prohibit Debbie Wasserman-Schultz from appearing on Maher's show as she regularly does in defiance of Maher's misogynistic tendencies? I doubt it. That wouldn't be to his advantage now would it? How else would Wasserman-Schultz, or any other Obama supporter push his agenda towards Maher's sheepish audience? Then again, she is not an employee of Obama, so he can't tell her that any; I get that. But he could publicly suggest it couldn't he? But again, because it benefits him, he wouldn't anyway.

Tuesday, March 06, 2012

Why Liberals Deploy Double Standard on Anti-Woman Comments

Always Classy Those Liberals

In the wake of Andrew Breitbart's death, left-wing hate radio has continued to defile his memory. One could expect this given their history. But to viciously and despicably say vile things about the man's wife and children? Apparently John Sylvester of WTDY in Madison, Wisconsin has no conscience or lack of audaciousness. Neither do his callers. And Rush Limbaugh is disgusting?

Humor. It's All Just Humor

Here We Go Again?

You can laugh. You can ignore it. And I am no conspiracy theorist, but just ask yourself, what if it's true?
Just sayin'.

The Abolition of Capitalism: Inside the Occupy Movement

The late Andrew Breitbart shows us what may be his greatest work. And with it what may save the country from a dangerous, radical element within that is not-so-well-hidden inside the Occupy movement. Breitbart is shown at the beginning of this video (at least what is shown in this version) telling us that "...But when you find out what is the story of the year, what really is behind the Occupy movement, you're going to realize it's not the story of the year, but the story of the decade. And it's the story about how the most radical people, not just in the United States, but the most radical people in the world who are there to support Hamas, people that are there to support the sewing of dissent and revolution, the support of the Muslim brotherhood..."

A lot of right-wing websites show films or clips like this and then "joke" about how crazy these people are. Well this is no joke. These people are serious and have financial and political backing. In the most serious I can be, patriotic, true patriotic Americans (and Canadians and English and French and Germans and whomever else values liberty for that matter) have to be vigilant and not be afraid to stand up and expose these people. They're not hard to spot. They are very vocal and proud of what they wan to do. And they want to enslave you. That in itself may sound radical and extreme, but there is no other word for it. They think they're are doing what's best, although some, perhaps even most, know that their violent and fascist means will hurt and kill people and they don't care. They will destroy liberty. That is not an embellishment or far-fetched psycho-babble. Don't wait until it's to late. don't let them persuade you with flowery or "intelligent" language. This is not a battle between right and left, it is a war between right and wrong, and yes, good and evil. Don't let the media, friends or even your family tell you to relax or that your crazy, that you're watching too much TV or reading too much "conspiracy" literature on the internet.
This is serious

Really? NBC Actually Spotlights Al Sharpton to Slam Limbaugh?

No, really, is this a joke?

Did NBC really have the biggest racist on the planet, Al Sharpton on to discuss Rush Limbaugh's so-called misogynist comments? The "man" who in 1991 called Jews in New York City "diamond merchants?" The racist who in 1987 defended fellow racist and liar Tawana Brawley? The homophobe who once called someone a "punk faggot" on the old Morton Downey, Jr. Show?

I mean, really? NBC where the hell are your ethics?

Monday, March 05, 2012

Powers Follows Up Her Assertion

On Sunday, liberal pundit Kirstin Powers wrote a column for the Daily Beast entitled, "Rush Limbaugh Isn’t the Only Media Misogynist." Earlier tonight she appeared on FOX's America Live and expanded on her factual opinion that Newt Gingrich seconded on Sunday afternoon, as did the Washington Post's Karen Tumulty and Las Vegas Review-Journal's Sherman Frederick.

And On and On an On

Rush Limbaugh has apologized for his comments about opportunist and attention-seeker (not to mention possible nymphomaniac) Sandra Fluke. Fluke got her and the national media what she wanted. She got her 15 minutes of fame and then some and she got the MSM to not only focus on getting the country's attention on Rush Limbaugh and their on-going mission to get him off the air, but also off of Barack Obama's lousy job of running the country where the attention should be. Bravo media and Ms. Fluke, you did you're hatch job.

Well, Fluke didn't accept Limbaugh's apology and to further the case that she starves for the spotlight, she went on the henfest that is The View where she's sure to get her fellow Feminazis to shed a few tears for her. Even conservative Elizabeth Hasselbeck fell in the trap when she asked about Obama calling her and trying to look like the knight in shining armor for political purpose; something even (astonishingly) NBC's Savannah Guthrie noticed (and more surprisingly said out loud) of course Time magazine's Mark Halperin was quick to jump to the aid of transparent parlor trick from the president.

This issue seemingly will not disappear until the left is done with it. When David Letterman "jokingly" (there's that excuse again) said that New York Yankee Derek Jeter should have "relations" with Sarah Palin's six-year-old daughter, Letterman apologized and Palin accepted it and everyone moved on. At least what Limbaugh said was about an adult. But instead of letting it go like grown-ups, the left must, absolutely must continue to beat a dead horse. So NBC stirred it up even more by executing their tried and true tactic of inviting a member of NOW to pile on Limbaugh with more disgusting hypocrisy by totally and willfully ignoring repeated misogynistic comments by the talentless and pseudo-intellectual Bill Maher concerning Sarah Palin. NOW themselves had already played their hand in showing they truly don't care about insults towards conservative women. Apparently Maher gets a pass time and time again because unlike Limbaugh, he's on cable television and doesn't have sponsors, so morals or common decency have nothing to do with it, just financial ramifications. Maher, NBC, The View...the left, scumbags all.

I am so sick and tired of the blatant double standard of the left-wing media and even more so of those who say it doesn't exist! Launches Breitbart 2.0

The last year of Andrew Breitbart's life was spent on perfecting this "redesigned' site dedicated to truth in journalism and holding the left accountable for their attempted totalitarianism and Alinsky tactics. Now even another source of information to use against the enemy of the people.

In 10 Days...

I wish the above title could be heard a la "The Ring" when somebody answered the phone after watching the video.

In the last great act of Andrew Breitbart, his boys Joel Pollak and Larry O’Connor will be releasing the tapes of Barack Obama in college that Breitbart spoke of at this year's CPAC.

Occupy Hippies Set to Make Movie

You had to know this was coming. A few questions though. One, where will they get their financing and distribution? Two, will Michael Moore direct or just steal the idea for himself? Three, will it just be V For Vendetta re-dubbed? And Four, will it be feature length or a documentary on how to rape, murder and defecate on public streets?

People Aren't Smart Enough for Democracy to Flourish, Scientists Say

The age of liberal indoctrination and media have apparently done their job, as if you didn't know that already. All the totalitarian hopefuls like oh, most of the Democrat Party are now chomping at the bit ready to implement their next phase of destroying liberty.

All in the Name of Saving Face

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder is expected to outline the legal framework for the use of lethal force in targeted killings of Americans overseas in a major speech at Northwestern University, reports the Associated Press.

This is apparently only in response to three recently filed lawsuits "that have sought to force the Obama administration to publicly release its legal justification for the drone strike that killed U.S.-born al-Qaida cleric Anwar al-Awlaki in Yemen."

A lawyer for a terrorist wants to know why his client was killed and Obama sends his Attorney General? Is this what this is, damage control? Who cares about the legal justification in killing the mastermind behind a plan to bring down an airliner on one of the most celebrated Christian holidays? If lethal force in killing global terrorists or anyone targeting Americans overseas has been legal since September 2001, tell this ambulance chaser to pay attention to the wire services.

20 Obvious Truths That Will Shock Liberals

Via John Hawkins from Townhall. Hawkins runs Right Wing News.

1) The Founding Fathers were generally religious, gun-toting small government fanatics who were so far to the Right that they'd make Ann Coulter look like Jimmy Carter.

2) The greatest evil this country has ever committed isn't slavery; it's killing more than 50 million innocent children via abortion.

3) Conservatives are much more compassionate than liberals and all you have to do to prove it is look at all the studies showing that conservatives give more of their money to charity than liberals do.

4) When the Founding Fathers were actually around, there were official state religions and the Bible was used as a textbook in schools. The so-called "wall of separation between church and state" has absolutely nothing to do with the Constitution and everything to do with liberal hostility to Christianity.

5) The biggest problem with our economy today is Barack Obama. His demonization of successful people, his driving up gas prices, his regulatory overload and threats to increase taxes have terrified businesses into hunkering down, refusing to spend money, and declining to hire new people. Replacing him would do more than any government policy to spur economic growth.

6) Not only are conservatives more patriotic than liberals, but most American liberals "love" America in about the same way that a wife-beater loves his wife.

7) Out of every 100 cries of “Racism” you hear these days, 99 are motivated by nothing other than politics.

8) Anyone paying income taxes is certainly paying his “fair share" -- and then some -- compared to the people who pay nothing.

9) You don't have a "right" to anything that other people have to pay to provide for you.

10) If we can ask people to present an ID to buy alcohol, drive a car, or get on an airplane, then asking them to present identification to vote is a no-brainer.

11) There's absolutely nothing that the government does smarter, better, or more efficiently than the private market with roughly equivalent resources.

12) The biggest problem with education in this country is liberals. They fight vouchers, oppose merit pay, refuse to get rid of terrible teachers, and bend over backwards to keep poor kids trapped in failing schools.

13) Fascism, socialism, and communism are all left-wing movements that have considerably more in common with modern liberalism than modern conservatism.

14) The Democratic Party was behind slavery, the KKK, and Jim Crow laws. It was also the party of Margaret Sanger, George Wallace, and Bull Connor. It has ALWAYS been a racist party. Even today, white liberals support Affirmative Action and racial set-asides because they still believe black Americans are too inferior to go up against whites on an even playing field.

15) A man with good morals who falls short and becomes a hypocrite is still a far better man than a liberal who can never be called a hypocrite because he has no morals at all.

16) The most dire threat to America's future and prosperity in the last 150 years hasn't been the Nazis, the Soviets, or Al-Qaeda;, it's the spending and overreach of our own government.

17) Greed isn't someone wanting to keep more of what he earns; it's people demanding a greater share of money that someone else earns.

18) Most of the time in American politics, the liberal "victim" is really a bad guy who is absolutely delighted by the opportunity to pretend to be "offended."

19) Jesus Christ was not a conservative, a liberal, or a politician. He was also not a capitalist or a socialist. Still, you can say this: Jesus drew sharp lines about what's right and wrong, he wasn't tolerant of what the Bible categorizes as sinful behavior, and there's absolutely no question that he would adamantly oppose abortion and gay marriage.

20) When you demand that other people fund your sexual escapades by buying your contraception, your sex life becomes their business.

Sunday, March 04, 2012

Three Occupy Oakland Protesters Charged with Hate Crimes

The Occupy degenerates are at it again. More thievery and new hate crime charges are on the docket this time.

What are those long list of criminal charges by members of the Tea Party again? And did Andrew Breitbart ever have to award that $100,000 for any proof of racism?

Liberal Kirstin Powers Offers Some Saneness

It isn't often a liberal, much less a liberal woman, offers up some sound logic and reasonable debate. This might be the reason she is invited on FOX News, where the grown-ups are, to discuss real events that concern Americans and other citizens of the world.

She has penned (well, typed) a nice little portrait of the "media misogynists" of the left that of course go unchallenged by either the Democrat establishment or their peers. The list of these hypocrites and ill-tempered chauvinists is not surprising, at least not for those without the liberal version of malice-laced beer-goggles on.

Gingrich Once Again Reminds Media to do Their Job

Say what you will about Newt Gingrich, whether you love him or not so much, he sure can hand the media a spanking when they deserve it.

Let's forget about the inconsequential hullabaloo regarding Rush Limbaugh for a moment (as I had once it happened) and focus on the fact the media won't let it go and treats it as if Limbaugh has never said what the left would consider "controversial" before. They already and famously think he's the biggest piece of garbage anyway, so why are they continuously "shocked" and "angered" by what he says. Again, as if Randi Rhodes or Mike Malloy has said anything different. I never heard Limbaugh wish death upon anyone as those miscreants have. But they're protected by the liberal class wherein they can say anything they want with no fear of reprisals. And why? Because the liberal establishment agrees what they say.

Anyway, instead of making constant headlines out of high gas prices, the housing market, unemployment or the deficit the way they did when George W. Bush (or any Republican) was in office, they choose to make Limbaugh's recent (and again inconsequential) comments a national tragedy and headline news every night.

Gingrich masterfully reminded David Gregory of that, while at the same time it seems he has to not so much remind, but introduce Gregory to President Obama's appeasement toward radical Muslims while at the same time making the Catholic church more and more like a society of lepers.

Gregory basically ignored Gingrich's concern and went on with the media hijacking of the narrative.
"Can you appreciate the view of those that disagree with you that this is an attack on women's rights? That's their view, reproductive rights, access to contraception, and the extreme that it's some sort of war on women."

Gingrich, smiled in disbelief and responded, "Nobody's blocking anyone from having access to contraception. No one. The young lady who testified can get access to contraception. Nobody said she couldn't."
[T]he Ohio Christian University... is now being told it will have to pay for abortion pills."
"This is the most fundamental assault on religious liberty in American history."despite every effort by the elite media to distort what it's about. It's not about access to contraception. People have, people who want to can get access to contraception everyday."

Exactly. This has nothing to do with womens' access to birth control. You can get birth control anywhere. It's also about one silly woman's complaint that she wants everyone else to pay for her contraceptives, which was Limbaugh's point to begin with.

Such as...

Is it any more obvious that the goal of the media is to assist the Obama administration in steering the narrative away from any of the real problems facing America. Given their past round-the-clock reporting on everything Bush, how can anyone doubt it?

Oh, You HAVE to Get A Load of This!

I won't even set this up. Just give this a read via NewsBusters. Oh, man, is this funny! I literally laughed out loud.

"We don't fake objectivity on cable. We tell you where we're coming from, but that doesn't mean we lie or twist the facts."

This "woman?" lies so much, she really did take that mantle from you-know-who.
  • /* Profile ----------------------------------------------- */ #profile-container { margin:0 0 1.5em; border-bottom:1px dotted #444; padding-bottom:1.5em; } .profile-datablock {