Sunday, September 30, 2012

More selective Editing at MSNBC?

This has to be substaniated, but it looks like the Obama sycophants at BSNBC are at it again.  Isn't it great that supporters of Obama (nevermind the irony of a so-called "news" network are openly supporting anybody) that claim he is so awesome and is such a great leader that they continually have to lie about their hero's "accomplishments" and focus on never-happened "gaffes" instead of Obama's so-called stellar record? 

Where's the Outrage?

Imagine for a moment if George W. Bush or any Republican president for that matter, had outright lied about an American consulate in the Mid-East being raided, burned and American dignitaries being dragged out of the building and murdered; then only to find out that not only had he lied about it, but the mainsream media (save for a few reporters that actually asked questions about it-and if it were Bush, you know they would) instead of collectively falling asleep at the switch?  How upset would the left be at not only Bush, but a very "conservative media?"

That's what time has uncovered the last couple of weeks...the truth, and amazingly, the Obamedia has reported it.  And the simple fact is, if you ever worked with classified intelligence in ongoing, fast-moving events, that's the way the information evolves." WMD's anyone?

The Libyan consulate attacks were not the result of a spontaneous mob insulted and angry at some second-rate Youtube video. We're still waiting on why they won't report information on an apparent illegal Fast & Furious, but they eventually got to this.  Of course, it was after the right-wing blogs already had so they really had no choice and couldn't put the cat back in the bag.  Where's the lefty outrage?  Where's the chants of "Obama lied, people died?"  Where's the calls for impeachment and a demand for a trial for crimes against humanity?  I mean where's Code Pink? 

I don't expect any Muslim apologist and/or "leader" to set the record straight about how this act of free speech, even if did insult the same poor sensitive Muslims that cheer at the stabbing of a Jewish baby in the crib, was just another excuse to demand the first amendment to the U.S. constituion be eradicated and those who have gone on record after jumping the gun with their political correctness to blindly and cowardly side with said extemists.  And I mean real extremists, not those who are considered as such simply because they disagree with you.  Again, I can't wait for the release of Zero Dark Thirty and how the media and left will spin the violence after more westerners die due to the "insulting" of people that get insulted when the wind blows.  And since the film will undoubtedly and wrongfully make President Obama himself look like the killer of Usama bin Laden.  What or who will the Muslim world burn and murder then?  But alas, the left will just find a way to blame Bush for it.  Then again, so will Obama.

If it were only Bush, then the liberal interpretation of justice would be heard.  Wouldn't we all sleep better?

Race Card A Plenty

He's at it again.  Not that he has ever stopped, but MSNBC's "Toure" is on another quest to fill caucasion Americans minds with "white guilt," as well as blacks with white hatred, as he once again is blaming the awakening of people discovering that Barack Obama is not only not a demigod, but also not a particularly good president.  Nevermind the rise of unemployment, the deficit, national debt, mistrust and confusion in his administration and the fall of the credit score from triple A to double A (again the first time in American history-the first "first" of Obama the left loves to ignore) not to mention his popularity and policies like Born Alive Protection Act (to effectively kill babies that survive the abortion process) the schmoozing of Muslim extremists and the alienation of allies, etc, etc.

But "Toure" doesn't even try to defend Obama's policies, or even take serious any legitimate, intelligent argument about them.  Nope, the only thing "Toure" is interested in defending is Obama's skin color.  Why he keeps on fighting for something that there is no fight against is beyond me and all those who are left scratching their heads ever time this guy opens his mouth.  Everytime.  This is why (among other obvious reasons) that Dr. Boyce watkins labeled "Toure" the "Kim Kardashian clone of social commentary."

So no "Toure," if Obama loses in November, it won't be because of his race, it will be because of demagoguing, race-baiting supporters like you who have absolutely no idea how the average American thinks and why they vote the way they do.  And smart people are tired of it.
Exit question:  How racist will the blacks, Hispanics, Asians and other non-white voters be when they don't vote for Romney?  Were they as racist when they didn't vote for John McCain?  Were they just general racists when they voted for Obama based solely on his skin color?

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Pakistani Railway Minister Puts Bounty on "Innocence of Muslims" Maker

So now that the Obama administration not only "detained" a private citizen and suspended his First Amendment rights all in the name of appeasing extremist, murdering Muslims hell bent on killing Americans and any Christian/Westerner just because, and the administration is still cowarding behind the excuse that a amateur-made "film" about Mohhamed and Muslims violent-prone beliefs caused a viloent uprising in Libya that resulted in the murder of American ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens as well as three others, not centeries-old hatred, Obama-ordered drones bombing Muslims or even an al Qaeda pre-meditated attack.

And now that said citizen has a bounty on his head from the Pakistani Railway Minister, what ill Obama do to protect him or, God forbid who will he blame when some Muslim extremist collects on that bounty?  A bounty that Obama has yet to condemn by the way.  I'll give you one guess who he'll blame.  How much do you want to bet it'll be American insensitivity to the "religion of peace" born out of the previous administrations "cowboy policies' rather than some film that celebrates the death of what many Muslims consider to be not only a hero , but now, officially, a martyr.  Should the new film's release be stopped? (and remember, Obama gave special and unprecedented access to the filmakers to accentuate his phony legacy-which may or may not have been a breach of national security, which the left would say was definitely the case if Bush had narcissistically made a film about taking out Saddam Hussein for example)

So what happens when Zero Dark Thirty (which should be pronounced "Oh Dark Thirty") hits theatres world-wide and another Muslim riot dy happens.  Who will Obama blame for the deaths of more Americans in the Middle East when that film pisses them off.  See it's okay to infuriate Muslims when it makes Obama look like a hawk and a killer of giants (although waiting 16 hours to make a no-brainer decision and then say "get him" isn't exactly rocket science) but when a private citizen makes a movie that he has every single right to make, that's just Islamophobia and religious intolerence.

Do you see the double standard that Obama and the left revel in yet?

By the way, how much credit will the film either give to George W. Bush for laying down the foundation and supplying the apparatus to even find bin Laden or will his name only be mentioned to say (erroneously) how much of a hinderence or complete failure Bush's hunt for bin Laden was.  If they mention him at all, my money is on the latter.

Michelle's Bill in Action: Kids Complain about Hunger; Officials Claim Wasted Food

So much for the FLOTUS being a dietary hero.  About two years after First Lady Michelle Obama pleaded with a lame-duck, though empathetic Congress to pass her sponsored bill that essentially forces children to have foods, although healthy, put on their trays and plates in school cafeteria's nation-wide, a mutiny of sorts has begun.  The kids are not forced Gustapo-style to eat the healthier choices, but the schools are mandated to serve these foods at the expense of what the kids actually woulf like, i.e. their choice.  Also, the rate of wasted food and hungry students that only get the minimum required calorie intake are now being heard. 

I'm not going to bombard Ms. Obama with negativity on trying to sincerely get children healthier and make wise lifestyle choces.  I get it.  But seeing the First Lady and her two daughters gorge on burgers, ribs, french fries and desserts (not to mention her children's recently-released school lunch menu of Philly Cheese Steak, Cheesy Ziti Bake with Alfredo Sauce; Asian Coconut Chicken; Sweet Italian Sausages and Senegalese Chicken) while on their multitude of vacations compounded with taking away school lunch choices (and in many cases schools outright banning parents from sending their grade-school kids to school with bagged lunches) is a little hypocritical and kind of defeats the point of her dietary crusade.

Maybe now she'll listen to the people that actualy have to eat the choices she made for them.

Just ask yourself why she has piece of mind about her own children being fed properly at school while the rest of America's parents have to decide whether peanut butter and jelly will suffice until they get home?  At the very least, why do her girls eat a variable five-course meal while the rest of America's kids get peaches, alfalfa sprouts and salad?  There's a reason most vegetarians are undernourished.  Meat=protein.  Like the kind that her husband and her served their guests at last years Super Bowl party.  Burgers, pizza, ribs, nachos, beer and pop topped the list, with a serving of salad, vegetables and dip (although not forced upon).  

Only a few weeks ago M.O. served children of guests at a "Kids State Dinner" a sample of the rest of America can expect during the Obama's tenure in the White House: cabbage sloppy joes and zucchini fries.  Although, I've had zucchini fries and truth be told, they're not all that bad.  However, it wouldn't be a part of my regular diet and I certainly wouldn't force my kids to eat it (then again, neither does she) much less othjer people's kids.

Ladies and Gentlemen...The Bombastic Obama

The man can do no wrong.  If you doubt it, just ask him. 

First came the promise of Hope and Change.  Nope.  Then he said he could heal the Earth and recede the tides.  Nope.  Next up?  Because of his Muslim heritage and education and due to his upbringing in a Muslim land, Obama, the great seer and demi-god that he and his sycophant press thinks he is, thought he could just whiff through foreign relations with Islamic leaders and countries.  An apology here, an apeasement there.  Everything would be all right.  Well, not so much judging from the violence in Libya, Egypt and Syria and the murder of an American ambassador-who's murderers Obama later apologized to.

First, he would cleanse by confession. Then he would heal. Why, given the unique sensitivities of his background — “my sister is half-Indonesian,” he proudly told an interviewer in 2007, amplifying on his exquisite appreciation of Islam — his very election would revolutionize relations.

And his policies of accommodation and concession would consolidate the gains: an outstretched hand to Iran’s mullahs, a first-time presidential admission of the U.S. role in a 1953 coup, a studied and stunning turning away from the Green Revolution; withdrawal from Iraq with no residual presence or influence; a fixed timetable for leaving Afghanistan; returning our ambassador to Damascus (with kind words for Bashar al-Assad — “a reformer,” suggested the secretary of state); deliberately creating distance between the United States and Israel.
These measures would raise our standing in the region, restore affection and respect for the United States and elicit new cooperation from Muslim lands.

-Charles Krauthammer
Democrats won't admit to an obvious, colossal foreign policy failure, the closest they have gotten is the tried and true, "it's not our fault, it's Bush's fault."  That's about as close as an admission of failure that you'll get from this administration.  But to argue or spin that the so-called "Cario Doctrine" is anything but another Obama failure of the biggest magnitude.  Unless of course you count the recent murder of an American ambassador in Libya as worse, but that is a result of the above failed Mid-East policy, not an "isolated incident" as the left is fond of saying.  Funny how these "isolated incidents" have the same end game and are carried out by the same perpetrators, isn't it?  Ah, those damn man-made disasters.

Obama Blames Bush...Again!

Fast and Furious.  Still haven't heard of it?  No?  The scandal that was supposed to rock the White House and the foundations of the Department of Justice?  Ah, the mainstream media and their unshakable dedication to their jobs as the "bearers of truth," except when it comes to one of their favorite sons.

After over two and a half years, the MSM has still not only not reported to the American people what their president and Attorney General have done in their role of the death of a United States border security officer, but putting that aside for now, what about the cost of this failure that not only robbed the American people of millions of dollars in taxpayer funds, but also armed Mexican drug cartels to murder more American law enforcement officials.  What does the President of the United States say about it?  What else?  It's Bush's fault.

This Too Shall Pass

And by pass I mean likely to be signed into law by the Muslim Brotherhood-loving Obama.  Of course sensible senators and representatives would override such a bill (I would like to think that even Democrats are not that easily convinced to give in to political correctness that would effectively end their political careers) that would undoubtedly be followed by accusations of Islamophobia on BSNBC and the moonbat blogs.

The story from Jihad Watch.

Reid Doubles Down

Since Weasel Harry Reid was busted for his pathetic lie about Mitt Romney not paying taxes for 10 years (about which we find out not only did he pay his taxes, but his charitable donations absolutely dwarf those pathetic attempts at "giving" by both Obama and Biden-and especially the 0.1 percent of Al Gore-who apparently cares about cap and trade, I mean, the planet more than those less fortunate than himself) no one on the left, not one member of Congress, not one "journalist," not one celebrity (with the exception of Jon Stewart) has taken Reid to the woodshed for his contemptuous bullsh*t-fest. 

Now that his one millionth lie has been exposed, instead of admitting his mistake and apologizing tp Romney, he's still pathetically, yet predictably trying to spin more sticky webs of deciet. 
The weasely one is simply compounding his reasons to kick him out of office-that unfortunately will never happen due to his spell on the weak-minded and foolish he calls constituents.

Whopper of the Week

President Obama has said some whoppers over the last four (or more) years.  "You didn't build that," "they cling to their guns and bibles," "They have to sit in the back,"  "Don't tell me I don't have a claim on Selma," "we are the ones we've been waiting for," and recently the murder of American ambassador to Libya and the anti-American violence in the whole of the Middle East as merely "bumps in the road."  But on Saturday in Milwaukee, he may have sputtered out his most humorous, yet saddest statement yet.  He actually told a rally in the Wisconsin capital, “I don’t want to spend all our time blaming somebody else – blaming unions or blaming immigrants or blaming gay people or blaming some other group for our trouble."

Unless of course that somebody else is a former president who you can (and have) laid all your troubles and failures on to the point where you actually have your dimwitted followers believing you have made absolutely no mistakes, you've never smeared anyone unfairly and everyone (except those nasty, nasty Republicans-who only want you out of the White House because you're "black") loves you like no other before, especially our enemies, who apparently have forgotten about their centuries-long hatred of the West since January 20, 2009.
Unbelievable.  The arrogance of this guy.

Do They Think No One Will Even Notice?

I know that those over at MSLSD feel safe in "reporting" lies about Republicans, Bush, conservatives, Romney, Limbaugh, what have you, but to lie abouit easily-checked facts about who ran Congress only four years ago is astoundingly arrogant, not to mention wilfully stupid.  They're safe because no one in the MSM will challenge them.
How much more pathetic can this get?

Sunday, September 23, 2012

Despite Having Ambassador's Journal That Suggests Otherwise, CNN Continues to Blame Anti-Islam Film For Attack in Libya

Is Matthews A Complete Liar or Complete Moron?

Either way, he's trying like the dickens to purpously mislead people so his failure of a president who now occupies 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue can run with more MSNBC-made "facts" that no one in the MSM will question him, or Matthews, about.  Dubya left office with a 10 percent (and climbing) unemployment rate?  Man, talk about a whitewash.  These liars will do anything to get Obama re-elected.  So, if it's not even talking about their shameful economic record, it's lying about it?  well played Tingle.  Too bad the facts don't bare out your psicosis.

But, at least someone called him a liar to his face.

Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Obama to Release Blind Sheik to Egypt?

Yet another great accomplishment in Barack Obama's foreign policy.  If there was any doubt who "got' Usama bin Laden, this is the true mindset of Barack Obama on how to deal with terrorists and those who worship their freedom.

"...for humanitarian and health reasons."  Yeah, that deal to release Lockerbie bomber Abdelbaset al-Megrahi  for the same "humanitarian" reasons sure worked out well, huh?  Welcomed as a hero in Egypt for the deaths of 270 people and lived an extra three years in freedom.  A nice big black eye for Scotland.  The liberal mind at work, folks.  Who says Obama isn't a terrorist apologist?

Media Hypocrisy Doesn't Like Romney's Truth

Once again, a conservative says something accurate and the media portays it as "controversial."  Has anyone ever heard anyone in the MSM catergorize anything said by a liberal as controversial?  Ever?  Everyone on the right from Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh and Allen West to conservative celebrities Kelsey Grammar, Jon Voight and Clint Eastwood.  No one on the left is rarely is ever labled with it.  Dick Durbin calling U.S. soldiers Nazis isn't controversial.  Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid  calling the Tea Party racists isn't controversial.  Bill Maher continually making disgusting and misogynistic comments isn't controversial.  The whole race-baiting crew of MSNBC (including Andrea Mitchell) smearing conservatives at every turn with the help of editied videos is controversial.  Nope, only right-wing folks are controversial and of course, "out of the mainstream," or at least that's what the can't argue/violent inducing/class divisive left wants you to believe.  They own the narrative (or so they think) so they decide who has the moral compass.

Now it's Mitt Romney's turn to now have to defend an accurate statement that the left doesn't like to be seen as legitimate, as it forces them to defend their elitism and dependency on government.  Once again, in an infinitum degree of examples, the press ignores anything that contradicts or embarrasses President Obama, while at the same time clarifying and apologizing for the Great, God-like Linguist.  Unfortunately for the Obama and the Dems, Romney said nothing wrong.  But perpetual Obama ass-kisser Chris Matthews and the rest of MSNBC  (as well as the rest of the liberal media universe) will tell you Romney is racist because apparently only blacks depend on the government (thanks to the GOP of course for putting them in that situation-as well as the DNC love them being in that situation as they can continue their mantra of "you need us") and that was who Romney was obviously talking about, right?

These people will stop at nothing.  They know Romney is right, but too much time invested in covering and apologizing for Obama will keep them under the blanket of wilful ignorance and cowardice.

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

DOJ Negotiating with Egyptian Government for Return of “Blind Sheikh?”

Like the man says, if this fool-hardy plan comes to fruition, it will not be before November 6.  Can you imagine the backlash, other than from the left-wing bleeding hearts and Islamist-lovers?  How much would Obama's support drop, even from Democrats?  Then again, with the cast of MSNBC and CNN's Soledad O'Brien & co. in the president's back pocket and their "Obama All the Time" philosophy, what would he have to worry about?
It seems Obama is on an encore of his apology tour.

Did He or Didn't He? Or is it Romney's Fault?

I'm not saying the Obama administration deliberately failed to warn the Benghazi consulate of the coming attack on Sept. 11, but like they asked the Bush administration about 9/11, 2001-what did Obama know and when did he know it?  Could it have been prevented, or at least minimized?  What about this alleged 48 hours in advance warning?

I personally don't blame Obama and his people.  Just like Sept. 11, 2001; even with any substantial credible information, I doubt there was any real who, what, where and whens that were not acted upon.  But yet when information leaked about the possible forknowledge of the attacks on New York and Washington, the media and left-wing blogs were on fire about "Bush knew and did nothing."  Of course, that's complete hogwash and the same doubt lingers here.  If Obama had sufficient information to warn American consulate workers (among others) of an oncoming attack and deliberately ignored those warnings, not only is that clear evidence for impeachment, but perhaps even criminal charges would be forthcoming. 

Obama may be a Socialist, an Islamist apologist, a clear-cut narcissist and a shameless liar, but to be totally void of common sense in respect to protecting American lives overseas with intel in hand, that's a bit of a stretch.

On the same topic, so-called Rhodes Scholar and definite useful idiot, Rachel Maddow not only, predictably and without a lick of irony, defended and absolved Obama of any wrong-doing whatsoever.  That's par for the course with Maddow and all the rest of the Obama sycophants over at MSNBC, but in her rush to lie to her tiny audience once again, Maddow may have unintentionally put the blame for the consulate attacks square on the shoulders of President Obama, warranted or not.  The totally amazing part is that she actually tried to blame the one person who had absolutely nothing to do with any of guessed it, Mitt Romney.  Even with just a haze of doubt or blame cast on her hero, Maddow turns into a pathetic, salivating (with her trademark cocky smirk) contemptuous, knee-jerk attack dog.  Yep, it's not the presiden't fault for possibly ignoring or failing to act on intel, it's Romney's fault for simply commenting on it.

Joe Scarborough: If Mitt Romney had kept his mouth shut, if he had not acted like a rank amateur, if he had not embarrassed himself-and by the way internally the campaign understands they screwed up, he's moved on, they know that. But Romney got in the way of the media looking at the president, going, wha-, wha-, what happened here? How did this happen? Now, those questions are going to be asked in the coming weeks. But they weren't asked in the first 24 hours because Romney was holding this horrific, irresponsible, press conference.

But maybe Maddow and her cronies don't have to lift a finger to protect and lie about Obama's four years of failed policies, because apparently the attack on the consolate is not the result of centuries of Muslim hatred towards the West, or even the bombing of Obama-directed drones, but the fault of a single filmmaker, a private citizen,  who told the accurate story of the Muslim prophet. 

"When the world erupted on September 11 and the Obama administration groveled at the feet of our barbarian attackers, the major news outlets — knowing that this was a disastrous turn of events for the Obama campaign which could not be spun in his favor — decided the only solution was to brazenly change the subject to a fabricated peripheral side issue: that Romney had committed some kind of “gaffe” by criticizing the government’s weak-kneed response."

Now as every other time when someone who isn't a raging left-wing lunatic doesn't fall in line with the MSM meme of "Obama the Saviour," that same media machine makes it their mission to publicly destroy said citizen.
Bravo, MSM, bravo. 

Dems Cooking the Books Again

At least in terms of polling.  I guess, as the article touches on, the Dem-friendly media are afraid that President Obama's true popularity and policy results (accentuated by the outed lies of said policies and smear tactics by DNC spokeswoman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz)

At least they're not polling the dead people that voted for Obama.

Saturday, September 15, 2012

Matthews Closet Door is Being Blasted Off

So apparently I'm not the only one who has noticed Chris Matthews going a little over the edge to hide his Grand Wizardry:

Apparently, Monday, Aug. 27, was opening day for Hysterical Liberal Sanctimony About Imagined Republican Racism. During this first round, The New York Times, The Atlantic and the TV networks each put in a splendid showing.

I’d need a book to cover it all. HOLD ON! I HAVE ONE — “Mugged: Racial Demagoguery from the Seventies to Obama,” available in fine bookstores near you Sept. 25, 2012.

Today, we will focus on the outstanding individual performance of the man who, since the departure of Contessa Brewer, is widely regarded by his colleagues as the stupidest on-air personality at MSNBC. Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Chris Matthews.

Appearing on “Morning Joe,” Matthews exploded at Republican National Committee chairman Reince Priebus, alleging that Mitt Romney’s harmless birth certificate joke from a few days earlier was a “cheap shot,” “awful” and an example of the Republicans playing “that card.”

(Discussing his hometown roots while campaigning in Michigan, Romney had cited the local hospitals where he and his wife were born, adding, “No one’s ever asked to see my birth certificate.”)

Even the liberals on the show were perplexed. Asked to clarify whether he considered the birth certificate joke “playing the race card,” Matthews angrily said: “Yeah, there’s no doubt he did with his birth certificate. No doubt. Why would he bring it up? Why would he say, ‘I have no problem with my birth certificate’? What’s that supposed to say?”

Mika Brzezinski: “Because he’s an awkward joker?”

Joe Scarborough: “Because he misfired badly on the joke?”

But Matthews didn’t have time for alternative explanations. Besides, he had already yelled at Joe and Mika, so the issue was obviously resolved. Chris quickly moved on to Romney’s ads describing the Obama administration’s change to welfare requirements as another example of racism.

Matthews said that Romney’s (factually correct) claim that Barack Obama is weakening the work requirement for welfare was “playing that card,” fuming at the RNC chair, “and you are playing that little ethnic card there.” Priebus, like most people who haven’t spent much time around Matthews, could only laugh awkwardly.

Matthews raged: “You can — you play your games and giggle about it, but the fact is your side is playing that card. You start talking about work requirements, you know what game you’re playing and everybody knows what game you’re playing. It’s a race card.”

Asked by Scarborough if he really believed that the welfare ad was racist, Matthews said: “Of course it is. Welfare? Food stamps?”

On “Hardball” that night, Matthews continued his welfare rant: The Romney ad was “ethnically charged” and a “dog whistle.” (The phrase “dog whistle” is a dog whistle for imaginary sightings of racism.)

For the clincher, Matthews added: “Did you catch Romney following it up by saying this was Obama’s effort to excite and shore up his base, passing out welfare checks? His base.”

As everyone but Chris knows, the “base” Romney referred to consists not of individuals collecting welfare, but those distributing it, i.e., union-dues-paying government workers. Democrats’ problem with welfare reform always was that if it worked, we would need fewer of these well-pensioned public employees, a fact repeatedly acknowledged by liberals themselves.

When welfare reform was first proposed in 1994:

— Will Marshall of the Progressive Policy Institute said the reforms would sever Democratic ties to the liberal “base,” which he described as: “Congress, the interest groups that cluster around them, the bureaucracies that work closely with them, the social service providers and experts and think tank types.”

— Robert Kuttner of the uber-liberal American Prospect magazine wrote that welfare reform would hurt Bill Clinton with “the Democratic base.”

— Liberal journalist Jeff Greenfield of ABC News said that Clinton’s becoming a third-way, New Democrat would risk “alienating a liberal base.”

I’m sorry, gentlemen, but it is my sad duty to inform you: You’re all racists.

The next night on “Hardball,” Matthews made his most dramatic announcement yet! It seems the mention of “Chicago” in relation to the president is also a racist dog whistle.

Matthews: “They keep saying Chicago, by the way, you noticed?”

Guest John Heilemann, like an orderly in a mental institution trapped alone with a patient, played along, responding, “Well, there’s a lot of black people in Chicago” — while frantically jabbing at the alarm button.

For the love of Pete, can’t we all acknowledge that a reference to “Chicago” in this context manifestly refers to corrupt, big-city, machine politics and 1920s gangsterism — not race? No one thinks Al Capone was an African-American.

My advice to Chris is: Pace yourself. It’s a long way to Election Day. If you get too crazy, too soon, you’ll have nothing left for the fourth quarter.


Poodle Busted Again

Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, the deceptive and car-washed poodle that she is, has been caught in yet another concerted effort to hide another lie she propagated to, well, cover another lie.  This time she attempted to lay the foundation of destroying the career of columnist Philip Kline with her sorcerous ways.

This is all par for the course for the Democrats and their smear merchants.  Wasserman-Schultz especially has been caught in the headlights before (which would explain her stunned look al the time) most recently with Andrerson Cooper wherein she deliberately misquoted a piece in the Los Angeles Times to make a false point about Mitt Romney specifically writin the GOP platform concerning abortion, which has been one of the party platforms for the last 25 years.

No admonishment by Obama for the multitude of lies this woman has told.  But why would he, given that she's speaking in "His" name.  She did afterall, learn from the best.
what will it take for the MSM (other than Cooper to his credit) to call her and the rest of the diabolical DNC on thier supreme history-altering (read white-washing) agenda.  We all know about their dismal , even disgusting racial history-from the Civil War, to Jim Crow to the Civil Rights Act, but the fact that the Obamedia remains totally silent on this repeated ploy is not only a new low, but also, sadly, predictable.

Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Linguistic Mustard Gas?

Check this out and try not to laugh if you're eating lest you choke.  The toxic MSNBC network and their new King of the Racists, the one-named wonder "Toure," said in a new article he fleshed out for his monthly unexplainable TIME magazine column, entitled "How to Read Poltical Racial Code."

If anyone would know about "racial codes" and the race card, it's this despicable, desperate race-baiter.

Never Forget

Eleven years to the day.
A bright, cloudless Tuesday morning in New York City, 2001.

Friday, September 07, 2012

Obama Convention Speech Fact-Checked

Not by ABC or CBS mind you, you know the "real" fact-checkers.  But regardless, the Liar-in-Chief swerves them again.

As for the often-repeated guts of his speech?  Same ol', same ol'.  He said nothing new.  Nothing.  It's the same tired old lip-service we've heard from Obama for four years at every stump speech, every State of the Union address and every single interview on the economy.

How many new ideas and hope-filled policies did he bring up at the podium with him?  How many fears did he put to rest with his brilliance of new jobs?  None.  Other than to promise more teachers (with bigger unions) more investing in energy independence and green jobs? (with companies like Solyndra?) 

Where was his "forward vision?"

Even CNN Obama-lapdog Wolf Blitzer said he didn't hear anything new.

Is the man who supposed to "stem the tides of the ocean" and "heal the Earth" and who was going to save the world starting to crash back down to reality?  It's okay, his ego will brake the fall.

At Least They're Totally Dishonest About It

And the Obama media tank just keeps getting fuller.

First Lady Fairy Tales

I'm not even going to expect the Obamedia to actually do their jobs and correct Michelle Obama or inform the public of her whopper of a forked-tongue.  But just FYI.

Orwellian Rewriting of History...Again

So, what's with the Democrats and their bold-faced lies regarding civil rights?  Are they so arrogant that they believe that everyone will just swallow their junk like a cheap prostitute?  Do they still think people believe this crap?  Are they so out of touch that they don't know of the invention of the internet and that anybody can simply research American history to find their pseudo-heroes are taking them for a ride?  Isn't it a tad misleading (not to mention racist) to tell the black community-the same people that you fought tooth and nail to keep in chains-that the very platform the DNC represents thinks those people are so stupid and so dependent on liberal lies about American history that they'll believe anything?

And it's the conservative movement that "keeps them down?"

Sunday, September 02, 2012

Pretty Much Sums It Up

This is what the left doesn't get about their PC Police and language gestapos.  Chris Matthews who made the angry (as in pissed his closet racism has been set ajar) accusation that if anyone even mentions Chicago when easily tying Obama's associations with the cronyism and thug political legacy of that city, they're simply being racist.  Well, simplicity is something Tingle would know everything about.  But watch George Will make it all so simple for even the most ardent, brain-damaged lefties to understand...and then deny...and then change the subject.

HuffPo, AP Doing Their Dishonorable Best to Outcast Romney

Show of hands.  Who out there thinks Mitt Romney is out of touch with mainstream Americans?  Hmm, okay.  That's a lot of hands.  I wonder if it has anything to do with the fact the liberal media has been lying to you about him from day one to protect their god in the White House and the horrible, horrible failure he is, especially at the economy.

Of course this is nothing new, disgraces like Andrea Mittchell and the whole MSNBC crew, along with a heavy majority of CNN people have been doing it for about 15 years or so now.  If you count the heavily left-leaning Walter Kronkite, we can go back into the infancy of television news to see how really deep the rabbit hole goes.

But a new low has been reached in American news.  After visiting hurricane and flood damaged areas in Louisiana, both the AP and Huffington Post took extreme liberties with the the truth when they decided to totally reinvent the facts of a conversation Romney and a local woman who had lost her home in the flooding.  The left-wing internet media did their usual thing and tried to cast off Romney, and all Republicans, as an uncaring, rich, white guy. 
Kudos to ABC for at least exposing some truth about the matter.
  • /* Profile ----------------------------------------------- */ #profile-container { margin:0 0 1.5em; border-bottom:1px dotted #444; padding-bottom:1.5em; } .profile-datablock {