MSM Lies About Tea Party Protests
Not that I'm surprised. This is what they do. The mainstream media (aka the Democrat Press) will not allow anything that shows (even the possible) Democrat hypocrisy-that includes the projection onto Republicans that they have mastered and that would expoe their "victimization" trump card. You know what I mean. Whenever a Republican is victimized, the Democrats, along with their media enablers, will attack the victim for their "phony outrage" and "callousness."
Well, this time, they're attacking Republican and conservative Americans as a whole by lying about the numbers of people involved at these protests, the number of people that have showed up to them and attempting to minimize the whole effort.
For instance, there are reports coming out of the Carolinas that say only 400 people showed up, when in reality there were closer to 2000. In Texas, reports say only "a handful of supporters" turned up near both Dallas and Houston, when in reality it was closer to 12, 000 to those that were actually there. Not only that, the MSM in all their righteousness think they can set the standard of conversation or worse, opinion.
One reporter from CNN, Susan Roesgen, stated, because she didn't get the usual liberal-induced, Obama-loving, sheepish, uninformed answer that she was looking for from a "tea party" crowd (who actually had to shout to her to "let him answer" when she tried to lead the conversation in another direction because the interviewee seemed to be more adept at history than her) that the situation wasn't "family-friendly" and that she couldn't hear herself. Funny, they don't seem to mind all noise when it's an Obama rally or speech. After not getting the answer she wanted because the crowd wouldn't bite on her "you're wrong and we're right" garbage, she "had to" conveniently send it back to the studio.
Anderson Cooper, not even trying to hide his bias, said after guest, David Gerger mentioned incredibly and inaccurately, the crowds "were searching for their voice," "It's hard to talk when you're tea-bagging." That's right, Mr. Take-Me-Serious-Because-I'm-a-Real-Journalist made a crude reference to a oral sexual act. Was he calling tens of thousands of Americans perverted sexual deviants? Or was it just a plain ol' off-the-cuff, crude joke? I'm betting on the latter, however is that a way for a "serious journalist" to act on national television?
Even CNN's Howard Kurtz commented on the Situation Room, "Much of the media seems to have chosen sides for 'tea day." That's the understatement of understatements. I'm surprised Kurtz gave even that away. Wolf Blitzer said, "many groups were small but the anger was large." And with that, he lied about the size of these rallies and at the same time regurgitated the "angry conservative" line. These media libs don't miss a beat when it comes to lying about, and attempting to discredit actual conservative/Republican accomplishments. And even if they do, it's more along the lines of, "But it doesn't really matter in the big picture" or "too little, too late" that type of thing.
But back to the main point. This story, from the Vancouver Sun up in British Columbia seemed to revel in their assumption that the crowds weren't there:
"Participants had hoped to rally hundreds of thousands of people to begin a grassroots movement that would force Obama to change government policy. But the turn-out was far from what was hoped for, with most rallies looking decidedly on the small side, especially compared to the 2006 immigrants rights rallies or the 2004 pro-choice march on Washington, both of which attracted millions."
The reference to the "immigrants rights rallies," is of course a media-created (lie) number inflated story with no mention that these were illegal immigrants. It was, in and of itself is a fraud because the story was debunked by right-wing news outlets (FOX News was not alone) and bloggers as media "number-jacking." Also, I never, not once, heard anybody involved in this movement (which you will never here the left call it) say they expected any certain amount of people to show up. Granted, they said they would like to get people involved "all across the country" but no concrete estimate of exactly how many was ever uttered on the air or in print.
When it comes to the opus that is the MSM, the beat goes on.
FYI: MSNBC has it's own poll on how should Obama be graded as president. Low and behold, 45% of pollsters gave him an "F," while 28% gave him an "A." A total of 27% gave him either a "B," a "C," or a "D."
This is from MSNBC's own website, no less.
Poor Barry.
Well, this time, they're attacking Republican and conservative Americans as a whole by lying about the numbers of people involved at these protests, the number of people that have showed up to them and attempting to minimize the whole effort.
For instance, there are reports coming out of the Carolinas that say only 400 people showed up, when in reality there were closer to 2000. In Texas, reports say only "a handful of supporters" turned up near both Dallas and Houston, when in reality it was closer to 12, 000 to those that were actually there. Not only that, the MSM in all their righteousness think they can set the standard of conversation or worse, opinion.
One reporter from CNN, Susan Roesgen, stated, because she didn't get the usual liberal-induced, Obama-loving, sheepish, uninformed answer that she was looking for from a "tea party" crowd (who actually had to shout to her to "let him answer" when she tried to lead the conversation in another direction because the interviewee seemed to be more adept at history than her) that the situation wasn't "family-friendly" and that she couldn't hear herself. Funny, they don't seem to mind all noise when it's an Obama rally or speech. After not getting the answer she wanted because the crowd wouldn't bite on her "you're wrong and we're right" garbage, she "had to" conveniently send it back to the studio.
Anderson Cooper, not even trying to hide his bias, said after guest, David Gerger mentioned incredibly and inaccurately, the crowds "were searching for their voice," "It's hard to talk when you're tea-bagging." That's right, Mr. Take-Me-Serious-Because-I'm-a-Real-Journalist made a crude reference to a oral sexual act. Was he calling tens of thousands of Americans perverted sexual deviants? Or was it just a plain ol' off-the-cuff, crude joke? I'm betting on the latter, however is that a way for a "serious journalist" to act on national television?
Even CNN's Howard Kurtz commented on the Situation Room, "Much of the media seems to have chosen sides for 'tea day." That's the understatement of understatements. I'm surprised Kurtz gave even that away. Wolf Blitzer said, "many groups were small but the anger was large." And with that, he lied about the size of these rallies and at the same time regurgitated the "angry conservative" line. These media libs don't miss a beat when it comes to lying about, and attempting to discredit actual conservative/Republican accomplishments. And even if they do, it's more along the lines of, "But it doesn't really matter in the big picture" or "too little, too late" that type of thing.
But back to the main point. This story, from the Vancouver Sun up in British Columbia seemed to revel in their assumption that the crowds weren't there:
"Participants had hoped to rally hundreds of thousands of people to begin a grassroots movement that would force Obama to change government policy. But the turn-out was far from what was hoped for, with most rallies looking decidedly on the small side, especially compared to the 2006 immigrants rights rallies or the 2004 pro-choice march on Washington, both of which attracted millions."
The reference to the "immigrants rights rallies," is of course a media-created (lie) number inflated story with no mention that these were illegal immigrants. It was, in and of itself is a fraud because the story was debunked by right-wing news outlets (FOX News was not alone) and bloggers as media "number-jacking." Also, I never, not once, heard anybody involved in this movement (which you will never here the left call it) say they expected any certain amount of people to show up. Granted, they said they would like to get people involved "all across the country" but no concrete estimate of exactly how many was ever uttered on the air or in print.
When it comes to the opus that is the MSM, the beat goes on.
FYI: MSNBC has it's own poll on how should Obama be graded as president. Low and behold, 45% of pollsters gave him an "F," while 28% gave him an "A." A total of 27% gave him either a "B," a "C," or a "D."
This is from MSNBC's own website, no less.
Poor Barry.
posted by Northern Exposer at 09:17
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home