More Obama Lies of His Past Exposed, Documents Proof of His Membership of Radical New Party
The left will have a field day with this in an attempt to spin it, deny it or claim it has already been debunked (such as The Huffington Post's John K. Wilson who, in trying to debunk and smear author David Freddoso and the findings in his book, The Case Against Barack Obama: The Unlikely Rise and Unexamined Agenda of the Media's Favorite Candidate, wrote "...the New Party wasn't Marxist. It was a progressive party criticized by the Green Party for being too moderate. It's not exactly shocking to learn that Obama sought to convince progressives to support his campaigns.")
But Stanley Kurtz (a soon to be right-wing smear merchant if he isn't already deemed as one) has uncovered documentation that allegedly proves President Barack Hussein Obama was indeed a member of the radical, far-left socialist organization, the New Party. An association Obama and his supporters have denied since 2008. Not this will have any bearing on his presidency, perhaps other than hopefully convince more voters than the man is a professional liar and opportunist and to end his tenure next January 20.
This isn't a new revelation, as the subject was breeched by Freddoso in The Case Against Barack Obama:
"According to the New Ground, the newsletter of the Chicago Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) Obama appeared at the New Party's summer 1995 meeting to seek their endorsement in his state Senate race. The New Party, the newsletter states, contains a heavy contingent of DSA members and also members of the Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism, a splinter group that broke away from the Communist Party USA after the fall of its financial and ideological patron, the Soviet Union.
Obama obtained the New Party endorsement, but as New Ground states, it came with a price:
Once approved the candidates must sign a contract with the NP. The contract mandates that they must have a visible and active relationship with the NP."
The MSM will undoubtedly pass on this as they do everything negative related to Obama saying, as I mentioned, it's old news and they'd be right, except of course they covered it before (only because as usual they're scooped by conservative bloggers relaying to their viewers that it was delightfully untrue. I'm sure they'll just use the same "sources" and "experts" as before and file it under "nothing to see here" as just another right-wing conspiracy, non-news, non-associations as they did with William Ayres, Rod Blagojevich, Jeremiah Wright and all the rest.
Wouldn't it be nice if they treated conservatives and/or Republicans with the same kid-gloves?
But Stanley Kurtz (a soon to be right-wing smear merchant if he isn't already deemed as one) has uncovered documentation that allegedly proves President Barack Hussein Obama was indeed a member of the radical, far-left socialist organization, the New Party. An association Obama and his supporters have denied since 2008. Not this will have any bearing on his presidency, perhaps other than hopefully convince more voters than the man is a professional liar and opportunist and to end his tenure next January 20.
This isn't a new revelation, as the subject was breeched by Freddoso in The Case Against Barack Obama:
"According to the New Ground, the newsletter of the Chicago Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) Obama appeared at the New Party's summer 1995 meeting to seek their endorsement in his state Senate race. The New Party, the newsletter states, contains a heavy contingent of DSA members and also members of the Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism, a splinter group that broke away from the Communist Party USA after the fall of its financial and ideological patron, the Soviet Union.
Obama obtained the New Party endorsement, but as New Ground states, it came with a price:
Once approved the candidates must sign a contract with the NP. The contract mandates that they must have a visible and active relationship with the NP."
The MSM will undoubtedly pass on this as they do everything negative related to Obama saying, as I mentioned, it's old news and they'd be right, except of course they covered it before (only because as usual they're scooped by conservative bloggers relaying to their viewers that it was delightfully untrue. I'm sure they'll just use the same "sources" and "experts" as before and file it under "nothing to see here" as just another right-wing conspiracy, non-news, non-associations as they did with William Ayres, Rod Blagojevich, Jeremiah Wright and all the rest.
Wouldn't it be nice if they treated conservatives and/or Republicans with the same kid-gloves?
posted by Northern Exposer at 18:06
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home