Democrat Congress Gets Yet Another Pass from NYT
The "paper of record" must surely be getting their information from Bizzaroland these days. How else would you explain their blatant disregard for the facts and omission of history concerning Democrat senators and their part in the current economic crisis, other than they're simply the New York Times?
Unbelievable, yet not surprising.
If you care to notice the left hand side of the web page, the Times has a link to other articles in "The Reckoning" series, presumably designed to tell us who is ultimately responsible for the economic crisis. The problem is they never once mention the names of Barney Frank, Chris Dodd or even Barack Obama. All, as well as the Bush administration, had a hand in the economic undoing. Anybody that has half a brain and more than two years worth of memory would know this. Which is why I can't understand why readers of the NYT (if there are in fact that many left) aren't insulted by all this historic B.S. and the fact that the Times counts on them to be (or at least figures them to be) ignorant and/or indifferent.
NewsBusters' Noel Sheppard has some reminders of historic tidbits that the Times so conveniently "forgot" to inform their readers of.
The White House decided (for the umpteenth time) to correct the Times biased and inaccurate reporting.
I have to second Sheppard's column-ending question:
Shouldn't the Times have included [all] this information in its 5000-word article Sunday if the goal was to inform readers of the truth concerning this issue?
Don't hold your breath waiting for a correction.
Unbelievable, yet not surprising.
If you care to notice the left hand side of the web page, the Times has a link to other articles in "The Reckoning" series, presumably designed to tell us who is ultimately responsible for the economic crisis. The problem is they never once mention the names of Barney Frank, Chris Dodd or even Barack Obama. All, as well as the Bush administration, had a hand in the economic undoing. Anybody that has half a brain and more than two years worth of memory would know this. Which is why I can't understand why readers of the NYT (if there are in fact that many left) aren't insulted by all this historic B.S. and the fact that the Times counts on them to be (or at least figures them to be) ignorant and/or indifferent.
NewsBusters' Noel Sheppard has some reminders of historic tidbits that the Times so conveniently "forgot" to inform their readers of.
The White House decided (for the umpteenth time) to correct the Times biased and inaccurate reporting.
I have to second Sheppard's column-ending question:
Shouldn't the Times have included [all] this information in its 5000-word article Sunday if the goal was to inform readers of the truth concerning this issue?
Don't hold your breath waiting for a correction.
posted by Northern Exposer at 05:07
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home