With Undeniable Proof of the Latter, Lefty Pundits Claim "Radical Right" More Dangerous than Jihadis
As crazy as it sounds, with all the proof in the last, at least 18 years (Clinton through Obama) "expert" opinions from the left strain to convince the average person that the "radical right" in the U.S. is more of a threat than extremist Muslims. The same with Ezra Klein and Tavis Smiley, who claim with no historical proof, that "We've Had School Shootings From Young Christians," and "Christians do that every single day in this country." Have you finished laughing yet? Yeah. I'd like to know exactly what they're talking about too.
Like a commentor chimed in with, "Instead of only concentrating on Muslims, I think King should hold hearings examining terrorism by ALL religions. then we can really see once and for all the danger that Christian suicide bombers and Jewish airplane hijackers pose for us. not to mention those vicious Buddhists."
Of course, the left has been using Timothy McVeigh as a template for anything or anybody right of center that has the most basic fundamental disagreements with government policy for years. All the crazy lefties and extremist Muslims that attack government installations, Jewish places of worship; bomb boutiques, weddings, schools and of course bring down symbolic financial institutions and airplanes loaded with people, are always "isolated instances," never domestic terror. Another commentor stated an obvious, one that clearly hasn't entered the brain of left-wing propagandists like Klein, that "they are blowing people up specifically in the name of Islam and are doing so in order to advance the cause of the Muslim religion and extend Islamic political power. If a Christian, or even an atheist, or a Muslim or a Hindu, decides to blow people up in order to advance the cause of Christianity, that will be a problem too ... if it ever happens."
They continue to try and paint Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris, the Columbine shooters, as "Christians." The same goes for their "go-to homegrown terrorist from the right" (again, the only "Christian" one they can name within the last 16 years) Maybe they were baptised as children and that is what the left is going on labeling them Christians, but I don't recall any reports of witnesses hearing Klebold or Harris shouting "God is great!" or "In the name of Christianity!" as they carried out their mass murders. Even their favourite "example" McViegh didn't leave any martyr videos or notes claiming to "kill in the name of Jesus." And to that I say what I've been saying, if someone were to engage in a terrorist plot, planning it and executing it, they would by their own actions give evidence of not being a Christian. Jesus taught the opposite of terrorism--to love one's enemies, and to personally do good to those who mean you harm. The Bible doesn't teach terrorism in either Testament, so there is no theological or doctrinal foundation that would allow someone to label an individual as a "Christian terrorist."
For people put in a position of "expertise," these guys sure need to open their eyes and ears and surrender to common sense. You know, that thing everyone else calls critical thinking.
Like a commentor chimed in with, "Instead of only concentrating on Muslims, I think King should hold hearings examining terrorism by ALL religions. then we can really see once and for all the danger that Christian suicide bombers and Jewish airplane hijackers pose for us. not to mention those vicious Buddhists."
Of course, the left has been using Timothy McVeigh as a template for anything or anybody right of center that has the most basic fundamental disagreements with government policy for years. All the crazy lefties and extremist Muslims that attack government installations, Jewish places of worship; bomb boutiques, weddings, schools and of course bring down symbolic financial institutions and airplanes loaded with people, are always "isolated instances," never domestic terror. Another commentor stated an obvious, one that clearly hasn't entered the brain of left-wing propagandists like Klein, that "they are blowing people up specifically in the name of Islam and are doing so in order to advance the cause of the Muslim religion and extend Islamic political power. If a Christian, or even an atheist, or a Muslim or a Hindu, decides to blow people up in order to advance the cause of Christianity, that will be a problem too ... if it ever happens."
They continue to try and paint Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris, the Columbine shooters, as "Christians." The same goes for their "go-to homegrown terrorist from the right" (again, the only "Christian" one they can name within the last 16 years) Maybe they were baptised as children and that is what the left is going on labeling them Christians, but I don't recall any reports of witnesses hearing Klebold or Harris shouting "God is great!" or "In the name of Christianity!" as they carried out their mass murders. Even their favourite "example" McViegh didn't leave any martyr videos or notes claiming to "kill in the name of Jesus." And to that I say what I've been saying, if someone were to engage in a terrorist plot, planning it and executing it, they would by their own actions give evidence of not being a Christian. Jesus taught the opposite of terrorism--to love one's enemies, and to personally do good to those who mean you harm. The Bible doesn't teach terrorism in either Testament, so there is no theological or doctrinal foundation that would allow someone to label an individual as a "Christian terrorist."
For people put in a position of "expertise," these guys sure need to open their eyes and ears and surrender to common sense. You know, that thing everyone else calls critical thinking.
posted by Northern Exposer at 00:12
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home