They Might Get Some Respect If They Just Corrected the Record
While I was listening to Barack Obama's "rebuttal" to John McCain when the Illinois senator said, "I have some news for John McCain. There was no such thing as 'Al Qaeda in Iraq' until George Bush and John McCain decided to invade Iraq."
Afterwards, when all the news channels were replaying the soundbites for their top-of-the-hour reports, I noticed not one of them mentioned the inaccuracies of Obama's statement.
As noted in an earlier post, and as history has shown, Senator Obama (and the rest of the Looney left) is re-writing history for his own political gain.
Besides the obvious liberal bias in the news and their fawning over the empty suit, why hasn't the media corrected this misnomer?
The funny things is, the MSM were jumping on Bush about not doing enough to disable al Qaeda in Iraq in 2002 and earlier. Wait a minute. Wasn't that before the invasion?
The FACT that Abu Musab al-Zarqawi was in Iraq, with the knowledge of Saddam Hussein, heading up al Qaeda training camps in or near Ramadi and Baghdad, rewarding suicide bombers and their families just seems to be either to true to use (in which case their whole "Bush created terrorism in Iraq" argument is null and void) or they are simply ignoring it (in which case they are pond scum) either way, the truth is there for all to see...no, wait, it isn't until these phonies start doing their job and start reporting the facts, good, bad, or indifferent.
By the way, violence is waaaaay down in Iraq, more and more citizens are moving back, political progress is being made (finally) but there is no stories telling you these things to be scene on any of the network news casts or liberal cable shows. I wonder why. Any takers?
Afterwards, when all the news channels were replaying the soundbites for their top-of-the-hour reports, I noticed not one of them mentioned the inaccuracies of Obama's statement.
As noted in an earlier post, and as history has shown, Senator Obama (and the rest of the Looney left) is re-writing history for his own political gain.
Besides the obvious liberal bias in the news and their fawning over the empty suit, why hasn't the media corrected this misnomer?
The funny things is, the MSM were jumping on Bush about not doing enough to disable al Qaeda in Iraq in 2002 and earlier. Wait a minute. Wasn't that before the invasion?
The FACT that Abu Musab al-Zarqawi was in Iraq, with the knowledge of Saddam Hussein, heading up al Qaeda training camps in or near Ramadi and Baghdad, rewarding suicide bombers and their families just seems to be either to true to use (in which case their whole "Bush created terrorism in Iraq" argument is null and void) or they are simply ignoring it (in which case they are pond scum) either way, the truth is there for all to see...no, wait, it isn't until these phonies start doing their job and start reporting the facts, good, bad, or indifferent.
By the way, violence is waaaaay down in Iraq, more and more citizens are moving back, political progress is being made (finally) but there is no stories telling you these things to be scene on any of the network news casts or liberal cable shows. I wonder why. Any takers?
posted by Northern Exposer at 04:10
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home