Arrogant Huffington Shows the World Why Only Liberals Have the Right to Free Speech
Not to disgust you with any free publicity for, or to nauseate you with any of their anti-Constitutional rhetoric, Their Royal Loonesses, Kieth Olbermann and Ariana Huffington, like all dangerous liberals, believe that only their own kind should be given the liberty of free speech while spewing their hatred and unsubstantiated clams.
Once again, Olbermann's near-zero ratings have forced him to turn from crappy sportscaster to wanna-be "journalist" and throw out the Constitutional rights for anyone but him and his insane kind. So, to stoke the fires of communism, he had one of his favourite low-key, fire-throwers on "Countdown," to shill for the censorship of those who don't think whacky liberal-think. Or, better yet those who don't think at all.
I guess if you can't generate your own ratings, attack the ones who can. If it's not Bill O'Reilly, it has to be Glenn Beck.
OLBERMANN: [Glenn Beck is] "the most important mainstream media figure who has repeatedly helped to stoke fires of anti-government anger. It would be nice to think of Glenn Beck just as a joke, as fodder for this show and the "Daily Show" and others that point out how stupid some of this stuff is. But this report, you know, suggests something else, this is - fear-monger-in-chief term is frightening."
HUFFINGTON: "It is frightening. "Well, I would say the fear-monger-in-chief title should still be reserved for Dick Cheney, even in retirement. But barring that, there is something that we need to really pay attention to with Glenn Beck. We cannot just dismiss him. Because the truth of the matter is that there is a good reason why we have an exemption to the free speech protection by the First Amendment when we say you cannot shout 'fire' in a crowded theater. And he's doing that every night. He's basically using images of violence to bring together with all that he's accusing the Obama administration of, which varies from racism to communism, Nazism and everything else in between. So, all that has definitely an impact. I believe words matter, language matters and he's using it in incredibly irresponsible ways night after night."
So hypocrisy and lies by Olbermann on a nightly basis and the irresponsibility of Huffington to allow (and in fact, endorse) hateful and vitriolic comments on her site doesn't, combined with the(apparently forgotten) attacks on President Bush, constitute "fear-mongering" or hate? Obviously, not if your a liberal.
Really? Wow. How much of a total sheep or mentally unbalanced do you have to be to be mesmerized by someone on television to the point where you a) can't distinguish between hate and sarcasm, b) will do anything they say and c) just simply can't change the channel if you don't agree with what someone is saying?
Instead of fighting facts with facts (I know, mission impossible for a liberal) the left has to propagate the denial of rights to an American citizen (of course, while giving habeas corpus to non-Americans) Classic, post-modern liberalism, folks.
The story and video via the Culture and Media Institute...
Amazing, isn't it? Let's hear it for communism!
Once again, Olbermann's near-zero ratings have forced him to turn from crappy sportscaster to wanna-be "journalist" and throw out the Constitutional rights for anyone but him and his insane kind. So, to stoke the fires of communism, he had one of his favourite low-key, fire-throwers on "Countdown," to shill for the censorship of those who don't think whacky liberal-think. Or, better yet those who don't think at all.
I guess if you can't generate your own ratings, attack the ones who can. If it's not Bill O'Reilly, it has to be Glenn Beck.
OLBERMANN: [Glenn Beck is] "the most important mainstream media figure who has repeatedly helped to stoke fires of anti-government anger. It would be nice to think of Glenn Beck just as a joke, as fodder for this show and the "Daily Show" and others that point out how stupid some of this stuff is. But this report, you know, suggests something else, this is - fear-monger-in-chief term is frightening."
HUFFINGTON: "It is frightening. "Well, I would say the fear-monger-in-chief title should still be reserved for Dick Cheney, even in retirement. But barring that, there is something that we need to really pay attention to with Glenn Beck. We cannot just dismiss him. Because the truth of the matter is that there is a good reason why we have an exemption to the free speech protection by the First Amendment when we say you cannot shout 'fire' in a crowded theater. And he's doing that every night. He's basically using images of violence to bring together with all that he's accusing the Obama administration of, which varies from racism to communism, Nazism and everything else in between. So, all that has definitely an impact. I believe words matter, language matters and he's using it in incredibly irresponsible ways night after night."
So hypocrisy and lies by Olbermann on a nightly basis and the irresponsibility of Huffington to allow (and in fact, endorse) hateful and vitriolic comments on her site doesn't, combined with the(apparently forgotten) attacks on President Bush, constitute "fear-mongering" or hate? Obviously, not if your a liberal.
Really? Wow. How much of a total sheep or mentally unbalanced do you have to be to be mesmerized by someone on television to the point where you a) can't distinguish between hate and sarcasm, b) will do anything they say and c) just simply can't change the channel if you don't agree with what someone is saying?
Instead of fighting facts with facts (I know, mission impossible for a liberal) the left has to propagate the denial of rights to an American citizen (of course, while giving habeas corpus to non-Americans) Classic, post-modern liberalism, folks.
The story and video via the Culture and Media Institute...
Amazing, isn't it? Let's hear it for communism!
Speaking of the lies and hypocrisy of Herr Olbermann, does anyone remember this from December, speaking on the Obamacare bill (as it stood then?)
"This is not health, this is not care, this is certainly not reform.... They must now not make the defeat worse by passing a hollow shell of a bill just for the sake of a big-stage signing ceremony.
You have just agreed to purchase a product. If you do not, you will be breaking the law and subject to a fine. You have no control over how much you will pay for the product.... The bill now is little more than a legally mandated delivery of the middle class (and those whose dreams of joining it slip ever further away) into a kind of Chicago stockyards of insurance. Make enough money to take care of yourself and your family and you must buy insurance -- on the insurers terms -- or face a fine.
This provision must go. It is, above all else, immoral and a betrayal of the people who elected you, Sir. You must now announce that you will veto any bill lacking an option or buy-in, but containing a mandate. And Sen. Reid, put the public option back in, or the Medicare Buy-In, or both....
No single payer? No sale. No public option? No sale. No Medicare buy-in? No sale. I am one of the self-insured, albeit by choice. And I hereby pledge that I will not buy this perversion of health care reform. Pass this at your peril, Senators, and sign it at yours, Mr. President. I will not buy this insurance. Brand me a lawbreaker if you choose. Fine me if you will. Jail me if you must."
You have just agreed to purchase a product. If you do not, you will be breaking the law and subject to a fine. You have no control over how much you will pay for the product.... The bill now is little more than a legally mandated delivery of the middle class (and those whose dreams of joining it slip ever further away) into a kind of Chicago stockyards of insurance. Make enough money to take care of yourself and your family and you must buy insurance -- on the insurers terms -- or face a fine.
This provision must go. It is, above all else, immoral and a betrayal of the people who elected you, Sir. You must now announce that you will veto any bill lacking an option or buy-in, but containing a mandate. And Sen. Reid, put the public option back in, or the Medicare Buy-In, or both....
No single payer? No sale. No public option? No sale. No Medicare buy-in? No sale. I am one of the self-insured, albeit by choice. And I hereby pledge that I will not buy this perversion of health care reform. Pass this at your peril, Senators, and sign it at yours, Mr. President. I will not buy this insurance. Brand me a lawbreaker if you choose. Fine me if you will. Jail me if you must."
A pledge? Will he stand by it, or simply continue his slobbering love affair with everything Obama? I'd bet on the latter.
posted by Northern Exposer at 00:46
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home