The Audacity of the Left
Remember all those Bush=Hitler signs? How about signs (many of them being carried by children as per their loony and dangerous parents' plan of far-left indoctrination) saying "Kill Bush," "Indict Bush," "Impeach Bush?" No? Well, I can't blame you I guess. One can't really know about things when the media doesn't report them.
Now we all know about the MSM's almost sexual deviancy-type addiction when it comes to framing the Tea Party as racist. But exactly how many signs depicting Bush and Dick Cheney as demons and Nazis and all that good stuff were reported, or moreover condemned by the media? Not too many, if any at all. Compare the low and oh, so predictable tactics of MSNBC to anything you could categorize on FOX News as bias and deplorable. Many moonbats out there will bring up Andrew Breitbart. Well, number one, his credibility is only questionable to people like Martin Bashir who likes to use guilt by association (even when it's clear there isn't any) and the cropped pictures of a black man with an assault rifle and revolver at a Tea Party rally destroyed the liberal-induced myth that the Tea Party was too racist for the lily-white MSNBC (thus the purposely misleading video) Number two, through the Anthony Weiner affair, we learned Breitbart was right (as usual) and the media chose to believe and defend a cretin and a liar despite all the mounting evidence to the contrary.
But back to the double-standard, and favorable indifference of the media towards anti-Bush signs. Not one member of the media, not one of them to my knowledge, ever chastised any of these ravenous, hateful people about the context or historical accuracy of their signs. When signs and posters of President Obama surfaced with him in the Heath Ledger/Joker make up calling him a Socialist, the media and Democrats went into a frenzy about it, somehow, being racist. So, by that insane logic, not only were black people who simply disagreed with Bush's policies racist, but anyone carrying a "Bush=Hitler" sign is not only historically ignorant and a danger to children everywhere, they're racists as well?
Yeah. It doesn't make sense to me either. But that's my point. The MSM and DNC will somehow, someway defend anything their loony followers do and say under the guise of "free speech," even if they threaten the life of the President of the United States in doing so. Do I have to remind you what happens when the roles are reversed? Do well-meaning patriots gathering peacfully get treated with such kid gloves? Right. We all know the answer.
So here's a video entitled "The Audacity to Complain about Tea Party Signs" that speaks for itself concerning what the media will/wants to show you versus what they won't.
Now we all know about the MSM's almost sexual deviancy-type addiction when it comes to framing the Tea Party as racist. But exactly how many signs depicting Bush and Dick Cheney as demons and Nazis and all that good stuff were reported, or moreover condemned by the media? Not too many, if any at all. Compare the low and oh, so predictable tactics of MSNBC to anything you could categorize on FOX News as bias and deplorable. Many moonbats out there will bring up Andrew Breitbart. Well, number one, his credibility is only questionable to people like Martin Bashir who likes to use guilt by association (even when it's clear there isn't any) and the cropped pictures of a black man with an assault rifle and revolver at a Tea Party rally destroyed the liberal-induced myth that the Tea Party was too racist for the lily-white MSNBC (thus the purposely misleading video) Number two, through the Anthony Weiner affair, we learned Breitbart was right (as usual) and the media chose to believe and defend a cretin and a liar despite all the mounting evidence to the contrary.
But back to the double-standard, and favorable indifference of the media towards anti-Bush signs. Not one member of the media, not one of them to my knowledge, ever chastised any of these ravenous, hateful people about the context or historical accuracy of their signs. When signs and posters of President Obama surfaced with him in the Heath Ledger/Joker make up calling him a Socialist, the media and Democrats went into a frenzy about it, somehow, being racist. So, by that insane logic, not only were black people who simply disagreed with Bush's policies racist, but anyone carrying a "Bush=Hitler" sign is not only historically ignorant and a danger to children everywhere, they're racists as well?
Yeah. It doesn't make sense to me either. But that's my point. The MSM and DNC will somehow, someway defend anything their loony followers do and say under the guise of "free speech," even if they threaten the life of the President of the United States in doing so. Do I have to remind you what happens when the roles are reversed? Do well-meaning patriots gathering peacfully get treated with such kid gloves? Right. We all know the answer.
So here's a video entitled "The Audacity to Complain about Tea Party Signs" that speaks for itself concerning what the media will/wants to show you versus what they won't.
posted by Northern Exposer at 02:52
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home