Still No MSM Coverage of Gosnell

I wonder why?  With all the lefts love of killing unborn children en mass, reporting on all the torrid details of America's most evil doctor shouldn't be a PR problem in the least, one would think.  So why isn't the media telling us everything related to the trial of Dr. Death?  Is it because he is evil incarnate and the majority of the infanicide crowd aren't willing to defend him?  Why?  He's just the sort of "doctor" the left loves, but publicly distance themselves from because the rest of us normal child-caring human beings; so that's not it.

Is it because Gosnell is the Devil himself and the left can't be seen (at least publicly) to advocate his procedures, even though privately (and not so privately judging by the comments in his defence on left-wing blogs) he is seen as a saviour of "woman's rights?"  Or is that "reproductive rights?"  I've lost track of the liberalspeak they've chosen to mask their evils with.

But really, why isn't the mainstream media covering his trial like they would and did with the story of the murdered abortion doctor, George Tiller?

From Wikipedia:

Tiller was shot through the eye at close range and killed on May 31, 2009, during worship services at the Reformation Lutheran Church in Wichita, where he was serving as an usher and handing out church bulletins. The gunman, after threatening to shoot two people who initially pursued him, fled then escaped in a car. Three hours after the shooting, the anti-abortion activist Scott Roeder was arrested about 170 miles away in suburban Kansas City. On June 2, 2009, Roeder was charged with first-degree murder and two counts of aggravated assault in connection with the shooting, subsequently convicted in January 2010 on those charges, and sentenced on April 1, 2010 to life imprisonment without parole for 50 years, the maximum sentence available in Kansas.

And the media was all over this for a good two to two and a half weeks.  Most of it from CNN and MSNBC...of course.

So, again, where's the coverage?  Where's the outrage?  NewBusters' Jill Stanek can think of four reasons why there isn't any.

The fact that Gosnell is one of the most notorious mass murders in history-based on body count-and an abortion doctor to boot is a pretty good sign why the mass media isn't letting everyone know the horrors this monster is solely responible for.  
I wonder if the media would have such a hesitation to report about Gosnell if he were a Conservative or registered Republican.  Actually, I don't wonder about that.  We all know the answer.