The Obvious Left-Wing Media Agenda...Again
O.k, first off, here's the White House press conference transscript from yesterday that had the jurassic, ignoramous, Helen"I Love Jihadists" Thomas and her unbeleivable rhetoric, David Gregory and his usual hatred of everything republican, the whining, speculative, Martha Raddatz and the wishful thinking Jim Axelrod.
Video:
Does Thomas ever give it up? Did she even ask a question there? Does she realize she's a broken record with her accusations, such as her question a few months back, "Why did you really want to go to war?" She's another bias media member that has no knowledge of history and facts, despite her 1,000 year reign as a senior White House reporter.
Here, Tony Snow tries to school her on the facts concerning last summer's Israel-Lebanon conflict:
Can you blame his frustration?
Then there's Harry "The war is lost" Reid and his cowardly dodging of a simple question.
Here's Pat Dollard's great take on the press conference, as well as Jules Crittenden's blog Foward Movement.
John Stossel takes on RFK, Jr. over global warming:
He never does answer Stossel's questions, does he? Or explain his "corporate toadie and traitor" comments. If the issue of global warming has nothing to do with politics or ideology, why is a politician getting involved, much less with personal attacks?
And just for fun (and believe me, it is a pure joy to expose this fraud as much as humanly possibly) here is (I'm sure) just the beginnings of the exposing of Michael Moore's "SiCKO"
But for the more serious stuff, here's an item on the apparent revitalization of al Queda.
If this is true, and by all accounts so far, it is, then the President does have some explaining to do. Such as after four years of war, and with all the confirmed reports of the crippling of al Queda, how could this be allowed to happen? I can only think of one thing in his defence-Pakistani President, Pervez Musharraf is too scared to really go against bin Laden and his crew and didn't allow U.S. forces to enter his country in the first place. I truly believe if he had (and if the U.S. left-wing media and their defeatist agenda hadn't had a erection of hatred of Bush) we might just be a whole lot further along on the WOT. Or is that just a bumper sticker?
As for the Iraqi government not living up to their end and only reaching less than half of the benchmarks set, not only is the course of the war in doubt (although I still believe given enough time, they can be-see, without bias the actual progress made overall) but it may be time for Nouri al-Maliki to step aside. Now before you say I'm just covering for "yet another Bush administration failure", may I just say that you're half right. Should there be no further progress on these benchmarks, it can do nothing but indeed reflect badly on Bush and his plans. But let there be no mistake about it, militarily speaking, we are winning this war. As for the political side of things, sure Bush has to take some responsibility, but the real onus is on Maliki and his cabinet to find a way to get things done. He's the man in power in Iraq, at least officially.
On a another note, I can't believe (actually I can) the nerve and ignorance of this punk, Avi Lewis, who I believe does his smirky, socialist propaganda hatred for the CBC (gee, there's a surprise) it really irks me that we share a flag. He conducted an interview with Ayaan Hirsi Ali, the former Islamic whipping girl, who refused to take it and the fundamentalist Islamo-Nazis that wish her dead. She decided to expose the radicals for what they truly are and this terrorist apologist, Lewis, condemns her for it. Check out his idiotic statement, "Is there a school where they teach you these American cliches?" Talk to the descendants of (legal) immigrants or to immigrants themselves that DID come to America, worked hard, sacrificed and DID make something of themselves, because you CAN become successful in America (and Canada for that matter) despite his communist angle of "only if you're rich." And he obviously thinks that her statement that "there is no Islamophobia" is pure hyperbole. Of course, as with all the rest of the idiots who can't tell the difference between Islamic fundamentalist radicals and true Muslims, she has to carefully explain it to him. But she didn't back down.
What's even worse, this is the same type of anti-American ignorance that permeates in the mindset of the producers of the TOTAL crap that is "The Lies That Lead to War". The Michael Moore-type "documentary" that uses the same old lefty lies and lack of the knowledge of history. Yet the Canadian government still expects us to pay for this channel that excels at blind hatred of everything American and conservative. Except of course unless they're portraying any American left-wing ideology or socialist propaganda, then it's a full-on butt-kissing fiesta.
By the way, check out some of the viewer comments left on the site. One in particular claims that she (being a black Muslim) and anyone that defends her is a racist because of her (their) views. I mean, does that make sense or what? No surprise here, it's typical non-sensical lefty talking points.
Video:
Does Thomas ever give it up? Did she even ask a question there? Does she realize she's a broken record with her accusations, such as her question a few months back, "Why did you really want to go to war?" She's another bias media member that has no knowledge of history and facts, despite her 1,000 year reign as a senior White House reporter.
Here, Tony Snow tries to school her on the facts concerning last summer's Israel-Lebanon conflict:
Can you blame his frustration?
Then there's Harry "The war is lost" Reid and his cowardly dodging of a simple question.
Here's Pat Dollard's great take on the press conference, as well as Jules Crittenden's blog Foward Movement.
John Stossel takes on RFK, Jr. over global warming:
He never does answer Stossel's questions, does he? Or explain his "corporate toadie and traitor" comments. If the issue of global warming has nothing to do with politics or ideology, why is a politician getting involved, much less with personal attacks?
And just for fun (and believe me, it is a pure joy to expose this fraud as much as humanly possibly) here is (I'm sure) just the beginnings of the exposing of Michael Moore's "SiCKO"
But for the more serious stuff, here's an item on the apparent revitalization of al Queda.
If this is true, and by all accounts so far, it is, then the President does have some explaining to do. Such as after four years of war, and with all the confirmed reports of the crippling of al Queda, how could this be allowed to happen? I can only think of one thing in his defence-Pakistani President, Pervez Musharraf is too scared to really go against bin Laden and his crew and didn't allow U.S. forces to enter his country in the first place. I truly believe if he had (and if the U.S. left-wing media and their defeatist agenda hadn't had a erection of hatred of Bush) we might just be a whole lot further along on the WOT. Or is that just a bumper sticker?
As for the Iraqi government not living up to their end and only reaching less than half of the benchmarks set, not only is the course of the war in doubt (although I still believe given enough time, they can be-see, without bias the actual progress made overall) but it may be time for Nouri al-Maliki to step aside. Now before you say I'm just covering for "yet another Bush administration failure", may I just say that you're half right. Should there be no further progress on these benchmarks, it can do nothing but indeed reflect badly on Bush and his plans. But let there be no mistake about it, militarily speaking, we are winning this war. As for the political side of things, sure Bush has to take some responsibility, but the real onus is on Maliki and his cabinet to find a way to get things done. He's the man in power in Iraq, at least officially.
On a another note, I can't believe (actually I can) the nerve and ignorance of this punk, Avi Lewis, who I believe does his smirky, socialist propaganda hatred for the CBC (gee, there's a surprise) it really irks me that we share a flag. He conducted an interview with Ayaan Hirsi Ali, the former Islamic whipping girl, who refused to take it and the fundamentalist Islamo-Nazis that wish her dead. She decided to expose the radicals for what they truly are and this terrorist apologist, Lewis, condemns her for it. Check out his idiotic statement, "Is there a school where they teach you these American cliches?" Talk to the descendants of (legal) immigrants or to immigrants themselves that DID come to America, worked hard, sacrificed and DID make something of themselves, because you CAN become successful in America (and Canada for that matter) despite his communist angle of "only if you're rich." And he obviously thinks that her statement that "there is no Islamophobia" is pure hyperbole. Of course, as with all the rest of the idiots who can't tell the difference between Islamic fundamentalist radicals and true Muslims, she has to carefully explain it to him. But she didn't back down.
What's even worse, this is the same type of anti-American ignorance that permeates in the mindset of the producers of the TOTAL crap that is "The Lies That Lead to War". The Michael Moore-type "documentary" that uses the same old lefty lies and lack of the knowledge of history. Yet the Canadian government still expects us to pay for this channel that excels at blind hatred of everything American and conservative. Except of course unless they're portraying any American left-wing ideology or socialist propaganda, then it's a full-on butt-kissing fiesta.
By the way, check out some of the viewer comments left on the site. One in particular claims that she (being a black Muslim) and anyone that defends her is a racist because of her (their) views. I mean, does that make sense or what? No surprise here, it's typical non-sensical lefty talking points.
posted by Northern Exposer at 03:04
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home