Well, He Is Correct
What's with all the flack former president, Bill Clinton is getting because of an innocent, and more importantly, historically accurate comment he made concerning Rev. Jesse Jackson's electability issues? Clinton was quoted as saying,
"Jesse Jackson won South Carolina in '84 and '88. Jackson ran a good campaign. And Obama ran a good campaign here."
This was in response to a question about Obama saying it "took two people to beat him." Jackson had not been mentioned.
The fact of the matter is, Clinton is absolutely correct. Why in the world would this be viewed as racist? Mind you, we are dealing with the Democrats and their crazy lefty followers here. Everybody and their dog knows the race card will come up with the left whenever they feel it will further their cause. But remember, if it's a minority or homosexual that they consider the "victim", well, then all bets are off. It's sort of a twisted version of Ann Coulter's (right on the money) theory of the "doctrine of infalubility", which is to say, whenever a victim of one reason or another speaks, you simply cannot criticize anything he or she says. Lest you be considered an abhorent monster.
Jackson did win in S. Carolina in 84 and 88. The majority of blacks did vote for him to give him those wins in that state in those years. For once Clinton wasn't lying. Why did Obama win approximately 80 per cent of the black vote in S. Carolina this year. Simple. He is black, folks. Those are the facts, bottom line. Blacks vote for blacks, whites vote for whites, Asians for Asians, Latins for Latins, et al (however, if Obama does somehow take the Presidency, will that be the end of "Racist America"? Although when he does lose, you can be sure the left will cry in one big unified voice: "Racist America!! White America can't stand to see a black man in power!" The same will be said if Hillary fails in her attempt. "Sexist America just couldn't stand to have a woman in power!" To which I say, no, just not that woman.
I can't believe I'm going to say this, but jeez, cut Willy some slack on this one.
"Jesse Jackson won South Carolina in '84 and '88. Jackson ran a good campaign. And Obama ran a good campaign here."
This was in response to a question about Obama saying it "took two people to beat him." Jackson had not been mentioned.
The fact of the matter is, Clinton is absolutely correct. Why in the world would this be viewed as racist? Mind you, we are dealing with the Democrats and their crazy lefty followers here. Everybody and their dog knows the race card will come up with the left whenever they feel it will further their cause. But remember, if it's a minority or homosexual that they consider the "victim", well, then all bets are off. It's sort of a twisted version of Ann Coulter's (right on the money) theory of the "doctrine of infalubility", which is to say, whenever a victim of one reason or another speaks, you simply cannot criticize anything he or she says. Lest you be considered an abhorent monster.
Jackson did win in S. Carolina in 84 and 88. The majority of blacks did vote for him to give him those wins in that state in those years. For once Clinton wasn't lying. Why did Obama win approximately 80 per cent of the black vote in S. Carolina this year. Simple. He is black, folks. Those are the facts, bottom line. Blacks vote for blacks, whites vote for whites, Asians for Asians, Latins for Latins, et al (however, if Obama does somehow take the Presidency, will that be the end of "Racist America"? Although when he does lose, you can be sure the left will cry in one big unified voice: "Racist America!! White America can't stand to see a black man in power!" The same will be said if Hillary fails in her attempt. "Sexist America just couldn't stand to have a woman in power!" To which I say, no, just not that woman.
I can't believe I'm going to say this, but jeez, cut Willy some slack on this one.
posted by Northern Exposer at 02:23
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home