"O.K. to Lie" About Global Warming? Academics Paper Says Yes

Two economists, Fuhai Hong from Singapore's Nanyang Technological University and Xiojian Zhao from Hong Kong University of Science and Technology are publishing a paper in the American Journal of Agricultural Economics that purportedly "proves"  that media manipulation (read: lies) will "enhance global welfare" with their version of history and "facts."

This is about the media manipulation and agenda.  Not so much about who's trying to prove or disprove

This, along with the hacked e-mails from East Anglia University (which were investigated and found to have no evidence of fraud or scientific misconduct-says purveyors of human global warming from the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change-UNIPCC) shows that there's what, a consensus on the global warming/climate change/ global disruption debate?  Yes, debate.  Because contrary to what the power-hungry wannabe dictators and their supporters want to believe, there is no such thing in science as a "consensus."

Believe what you will, but since when is there absolutes in modern-day science?