One Things's For Sure...He Doesn't Hate Mexicans

With the all the B.S. about how President Bush doesn't like this or hates these certain types of people when the congressional Democrats don't get their way, you certainly can't say he hates Mexicans, the way he continually bends over backwards for them.

Apparently, the international courts are as happy as a pig in you-know-what about his recent decision to be lenient with a convicted rapist illegally in the country. The accused just recently (on advice from his lawyer, I'm sure) revealed that he's a Mexican nationalist. Funny, because he never stated that before.
The fact that the president has reversed the decision set forth by the jury that convicted him, this piece of garbage will now get to escape his destiny and avoid the needle (yes, that horrible, inhumane, painless, put-you-to-sleep-before-you-die method of execution astounds me, even after all the yoga he's done to please these people.

Why is he so concerned with the opinions of non-citizens that continually break the laws of the United States, while virtually condoning their illegal and often heinous actions?
Is he really looking for a legacy of being "Mexican friendly?" Look at the immigration reform fiasco and his refusal to close the borders. I think the question answers itself.

The father of the victim says he "no longer trusts Bush." I can't say that I would either.

Craig Flips

So Senator Larry Craig has now said he will not resign following his "lude conduct" conviction until the end of his term. He originally said he would resign at the end of October, pending the outcome of his appeal of his conviction. But now he says he can still do his job effectively. Any takers he's betting on all this blowing over, then running for re-election?
The judge refused to rescind his confession (and rightfully so) who described Craig's confession as "made in the right mind, intelligent and backed up by the evidence."
From what I understand though, tapping your foot while in a public bathroom stall is not really evidence of lude conduct. I'm not even really sure if that particular action in itself is a crime.

Having said that, I do believe Craig should resign. One, because he said he would, two, because he was convicted, and three, because it really is a distraction to the Republican party and politics in general.

Although I cannot let it go unsaid that his decision to stay until the end of his term is really no different than public official on the left retaining office after somewhat similar convictions or indiscretions, such as Jefferson Davis or Marion Berry.

Pelosi Strikes Again

Nazi Pelosi has said that a festival in San Francisco, that, once again, has an exhibit depicting the Last Supper that offends Christians and marginalizes Christianity, "does not harm Christianity".
To be exact, the it is a reproduction of Christ and his disciples being portrayed as "swingers" and/or sexual deviants, including having Jesus and his inner circle holding sex toys. Doesn't harm Christianity? I don't believe it helps much either, there Blinky?
I suppose she's just following the standard S-P, politically-correct, "tolerant", Christian-bashing, hate-filled left playbook.
These people want the rest of us to think their being secular and non-partisan. Show me a painting of Mohammed (or any image of the false prophet) that is submerged in urine or dovered in feces. Then we'll talk about tolerence. When will this be stood up to en mass? Certainly not by the "Hollyweird elite" or the gutless, Demorat-led Congress I can assure you.

We will all have to meet our maker some dayand explain our actions. He knows I'm certainly not the best Christian I can be, but I have a feeling that I may, just may be in a better position to negotiate than Ms. Pelosi and her Godless followers that advocate this treatment of our Lord and saviour.

Bill Clinton and Anderson Cooper

So Bill Clinton decided to give cable television another try. This time however, it was within the very friendly confines of CNN, on 360 with Anderson Cooper.

Asked about how he felt about the New York Times article from MoveOn.org, "General Betray Us", Clinton once again let the baseless accusations fly, at the same time not so carefully hiding his incompetence once again. But, unlike before, this time he wasn't accusing the host of having "a smirk" telling him, "you think you're so clever" and without pointing figures (at least literally) in the host's face.

No, this time he felt quite at home inside the walls of his CNN allies. However, he did decide to once again cast stones at the Republican party without any fear of hard-hitting follow-up questions. I mean I don't have anything really negative to say about Anderson Cooper. Overall, he's o.k. and his only real detriment is that he is a liberal and does work for the Clinton News Network.

Once again, Clinton was supposed to talk about his "global initiative" but it yet again, disintegrated into a mud-slinging towards the Republicans.

-He mentioned an ad the Reps used featuring Vietnam War veteran, Max Cleveland, who had lost "half his body" in that conflict.

Cleveland voted hard left for budget spending, among other things. He was a bad senator, that's why he was criticized. By the way, Cleveland himself said he didn't deserve his Silver Star and other battlefield commissions. If he lost his limbs and more for his country, with all due respect, I disagree.

-He claimed the Republican outrage over the Patraeus-MoveOn ad was "feigned" and "disingenuous".
Well he would know. But if he wants to lie about the sincere outrage of anyone on the right about the MoveOn fiasco, this isn't the guy who should be mentioning "bait and switch". Calling Monica/Afghanistan cruise missles (that hit an empty camp)

-He wants you to believe that the Swift Boat ads that (thankfully) sunk John Kerry's presidential aspirations were funded by the Republicans. Not to swift (pardon the pun) on that one there, Billy. It's a matter of public record that those ads were funded by private enterprises. Anything else, B.J.?

It's amazing, the detailed time-lines this guy can pull out of a hat with amazing "accuracy" when he wants to. This from the same guy who couldn't remember if he was ever alone in a room with several different women. This creep has the nerve to say anything derogatory about the military. This pot-smoking draft-dodger defames soldiers every chance he gets ( like most of the left) Instead of serving his country, he chooses to go to England, marches against the Vietnam War and then tries vainly to sound empathetic? Amazing. Willy and Shrillary, along with their Clintonistas, really never cease to amaze me.
Well, at least he defended John Kerry. Yay.

Greasing the Wheels

This disingenuous and utterly disrespectful slight and smear campaign against Rush Limbaugh, Bill O'Reilly and other conservative talk-radio hosts is not only a waste of tax-payer money, but a complete waste of time just so the lefty senators, especially Senator Tom Harkin can hear his own voice, try and rally against the indecency of the NYT/MoveOn.org ad; so they go after anybody and anything they say. Hey, it worked with Imus right?

Anyways, don't you think all the time and effort the left is putting into this could be better spent on more important things like, immigration, the War, health care reform (like smacking Hillary around for advocating bankrupting the Treasury with her asinine birth payments¨) It kind of makes me look like a hypocrite for even posting about it in the first place. By the way, on the subject of immigration, i just read Michelle Malkin's 2002 book, Invasion. I know, I know, shame on me for only reading it now. She clearly and convincingly points outs ¨How America Still Welcomes Terrorists, Criminals, and Other Foreign Menaces to Our Shores¨. She includes great sources and reference material, including websites to confirm her findings.

But back to the topic at hand. Harkin has attempted to drag said radio personalities' names through the mud because he said they insulted the military. This would be almost sick if it wasn't so deliciously funny. Seeing that Harkin is a phony hero himself.
Here's the bogus claim from Media Matters.
From a much more elegant and thought-out blogger, and frequent source of this blog, Amy Proctor and her Bottom Line Up Front has a take on the (albeit much ado about nothing-type) situation.

Michelle Malkin also has a good take on it.
And here's Rush's own (unedited) transcript, contrary to what Media Matters has claimed.

Because of the NYT/MoveOn article, the left is obviously desperate for something, anything to try and rally the troops and restore their moral authority. Do you think that Harkin and all those crying foul even heard the show. A Democrat actually listening to Rush instead of getting second or third-hand information? CHA-RIGHT!

Never mind the fact that Murtha has already tried this with the INNOCENT Haditha Marines (no apology-and don't hold your breath on that one) and that Jesse MacBeth creep is been outed (yet the left still champions him) These weasels just either refuse to learn or are incapable of it.

The point of all this is to try to get the galactically stupid (yeah, I stole that from ¨A Few Good Men¨) to believe that conservatives are (once again) evil, fascist, and don't care about their soldiers in harms way. Once again, this coming from the people that do everything they can to appease the enemy.
They take quotes, or half-quotes (ala Michael Moore) twist them, distort them, perhaps even add to them all in an attempt to do what I mentioned above.
It's simply all a vain attempt to grease the wheels to put in motion, the "fairness doctrine¨ once again.

It's all quite simple really. The left cannot win in the open market, so they'll try and do it legislatively. Come 2008, should they win the White House and both houses of Congress, they'll do just that. Of course for that to happen, people will have to actually vote for Hillary Clinton. You may think she has a real shot now, but when that voter (especially the old "silent majority") is actually behind that curtain and are at the moment of truth in front of that lever, they'll think about MoveOn.org, national defense, socialized health-care and criminal campaign contributors-not to mention that she has no experience running anything and simply does not answer point-blank yes or no questions-she won't be very electable then.

JUST A THOUGHT:
If Hillary actually becomes President (God help us all) and is finally exposed radical Marxist that she is, what do you think will happen?
a) She would be impeached?
b) She would resign?
c) She, the Democrats and MoveOn.org will blame Bush for it?
d) Nothing. The MSM will whitewash it and protect her to the end, even at the expense of America's future?

Patreaus Responds to MoveOn.org

Adscam Man to Face the Music

John Murtha may have actually stepped in it so deep, that even his Adscam money can't keep him clean of this one. Yeah, yeah, I know he didn't actually take the money ("not right now" anyways)

Please, please let there be some major fallout from this.

Veteran Marine Shoots it Straight

This was left as a comment (and what a comment it is) following the recent post, "Ahmadinejad Goes to College". It was posted by World War II and Korean veteran, Sgt. Jim Baxter, USMC. I think it speaks for itself.

In league with the stones...

Every September, I recall that is more than half a century (62 years) since I landed at Nagasaki with the 2nd Marine Division in the original occupation of Japan following World War II. This time every year, I have watched and listened to the light-hearted "peaceniks" and their light-headed symbolism-without-substance of ringing bells, flying pigeons, floating candles, and sonorous chanting and I recall again that "Peace is not a cause - it is an effect."

In July, 1945, my fellow 8th RCT Marines [I was a BARman] and I returned to Saipan following the successful conclusion of the Battle of Okinawa. We were issued new equipment and replacements joined each outfit in preparation for our coming amphibious assault on the home islands of Japan.

B-29 bombing had leveled the major cities of Japan, including Kobe, Osaka, Nagoya, Yokohama, Yokosuka, and Tokyo.

We were informed we would land three Marine divisions and six Army divisions, perhaps abreast, with large reserves following us in. It was estimated that it would cost half a million casualties to subdue the Japanese homeland.

In August, the A-bomb was dropped on Hiroshima but the Japanese government refused to surrender. Three days later a second A-bomb was dropped on the city of Nagasaki. The Imperial Japanese government finally surrendered.

Following the 1941 sneak attack on Pearl Harbor, a Japanese admiral said, "I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant..." Indeed, they had. Not surprisingly, the atomic bomb was produced by a free people functioning in a free environment. Not surprisingly because the creative process is a natural human choice-making process and inventiveness occurs most readily where choice-making opportunities abound. America!

Tamper with a giant, indeed! Tyrants, beware: Free men are nature's pit bulls of Liberty! The Japanese learned the hard way what tyrants of any generation should know: Never start a war with a free people - you never know what they may invent!

As a newly assigned member of a U.S. Marine intelligence section, I had a unique opportunity to visit many major cities of Japan, including Tokyo and Hiroshima, within weeks of their destruction. For a full year I observed the beaches, weapons, and troops we would have assaulted had the A-bombs not been dropped. Yes, it would have been very destructive for all, but especially for the people of Japan.

When we landed in Japan, for what came to be the finest and most humane occupation of a defeated enemy in recorded history, it was with great appreciation, thanksgiving, and praise for the atomic bomb team, including the aircrew of the Enola Gay. A half million American homes had been spared the Gold Star flag, including, I'm sure, my own.

Whenever I hear the apologists expressing guilt and shame for A-bombing and ending the war Japan had started (they ignore the cause-effect relation between Pearl Harbor and Nagasaki), I have noted that neither the effete critics nor the puff-adder politicians are among us in the assault landing-craft or the stinking rice paddies of their suggested alternative, "conventional" warfare. Stammering reluctance is obvious and continuous, but they do love to pontificate about the Rights that others, and the Bomb, have bought and preserved for them.

The vanities of ignorance and camouflaged cowardice abound as license for the assertion of virtuous "rights" purchased by the blood of others - those others who have borne the burden and physical expense of Rights whining apologists so casually and self-righteously claim.

At best, these fakers manifest a profound and cryptic ignorance of causal relations, myopic perception, and dull I.Q. At worst, there is a word and description in The Constitution defining those who love the enemy more than they love their own countrymen and their own posterity. Every Yankee Doodle Dandy knows what that word is.

In 1945, America was the only nation in the world with the Bomb and it behaved responsibly and respectfully. It remained so until two among us betrayed it to the Kremlin. Still, this American weapon system has been the prime deterrent to earth's latest model world- tyranny: Seventy years of Soviet collectivist definition, coercion, and domination of individual human beings.

The message is this: Trust Freedom. Remember, tyrants never learn. The restriction of Freedom is the limitation of human choice, and choice is the fulcrum-point of the creative process in human affairs. As earth's choicemaker, it is our human identity on nature's beautiful blue planet and the natural premise of man's free institutions, environments, and respectful relations with one another. Made in the image of our Creator, free men choose, create, and progress - or die.

Free men should not fear the moon-god-crowd oppressor nor choose any of his ways. Recall with a confident Job and a victorious David, "Know ye not that you are in league with the stones of the field?"

Semper Fidelis
Jim Baxter
Sgt. USMC
WW II and Korean War

Job 5:23 Proverbs 3:31 I Samuel 17:40

This is why they were, are and always will be the "Greatest Generation".
Thank you for your service Sgt. Baxter.
God bless you and yours.