New NASA Data Says Man-Made Global Warming is False

Not that I need to tell anyone with a lick of sense of this. I'm just relating it to say HA!
Of course the alarmists and money-grubbing opportunists will claim NASA is part of some sort of conspiracy now.

So Much for the New Tone in Washington

After Rep. Gabriele Giffords was shot by a lone nut in Arizona and the left and their sheep in the media wrongly, disgustingly and instinctively accused Sarah Palin of being the catalyst of that tragedy, the left played the babes in the woods routine and said that everyone (read: the right) needs to tone down the violent rhetoric and imagery. Well, once again that little meme only applies to the right (which is frustratingly rich since history clearly shows the left has proud history itself of coddling, defending and replicating violent leftists from Che Guevara, Josef Stalin and Pol Pot to today's Bill Ayers) since ever since that day, everyone on the left from radio talk-show hosts (Mike Malloy, Randi Rhodes, Stephanie Miller et al) to politicians continue to use violent imagery towards the right and no one on the left says a word. A few even get a good laugh out of it, including Chris Matthews and Bill Maher.

As recently as yesterday on MSNBC's Morning Joe, House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer said all the chambers seem to be loaded on the House side. They want to shoot every bullet they have at the president.”
Again, no one called him on it.

Liberals: Fascism is our business and business is good. Do as we say, not as we do.

By the way, does Hoyer even know what Russian Roulette is? How can you be playing it if your pointing the gun at someone else?

Spenditol

A solution to your economic woes from big government. SPENDITOL!

HA!

Bob Beckel: "Barack Obama Is The Greatest Economic President Since FDR"

Does Anybody Have Any Idea of How Much of an Idiot Paul Krugman Really Is?

Seriously. Does anyone? For that that matter who are the brainiacs who gave this imbecile a Nobel prize?

Check out the recent column of this putz from his aptly titled "The Conscience of A Liberal." Perhaps it should be "The Mind of A Liberal," since he seems to (for some wacky reason) speak for a lot of them.

Emphasis mine.

The Cult That Is Destroying America
Watching our system deal with the debt ceiling crisis — a wholly self-inflicted crisis, which may nonetheless have disastrous consequences — it’s increasingly obvious that what we’re looking at is the destructive influence of a cult that has really poisoned our political system.

And no, I don’t mean the fanaticism of the right. Well, OK, that too. But my feeling about those people is that they are what they are; you might as well denounce wolves for being carnivores. Crazy is what they do and what they are.

No, the cult that I see as reflecting a true moral failure is the cult of balance, of centrism.
Think about what’s happening right now. We have a crisis in which the right is making insane demands, while the president and Democrats in Congress are bending over backward to be accommodating — offering plans that are all spending cuts and no taxes, plans that are far to the right of public opinion.

So what do most news reports say? They portray it as a situation in which both sides are equally partisan, equally intransigent — because news reports always do that. And we have influential pundits calling out for a new centrist party, a new centrist president, to get us away from the evils of partisanship.
The reality, of course, is that we already have a centrist president — actually a moderate conservative president. Once again, health reform — his only major change to government — was modeled on Republican plans, indeed plans coming from the Heritage Foundation. And everything else — including the wrongheaded emphasis on austerity in the face of high unemployment — is according to the conservative playbook.
What all this means is that there is no penalty for extremism; no way for most voters, who get their information on the fly rather than doing careful study of the issues, to understand what’s really going on.
You have to ask, what would it take for these news organizations and pundits to actually break with the convention that both sides are equally at fault? This is the clearest, starkest situation one can imagine short of civil war. If this won’t do it, nothing will.
And yes, I think this is a moral issue. The “both sides are at fault” people have to know better; if they refuse to say it, it’s out of some combination of fear and ego, of being unwilling to sacrifice their treasured pose of being above the fray.
It’s a terrible thing to watch, and our nation will pay the price.

So to sum up, libs/Dems are sane and know all the cures for an ailing economy (strange that, since they never have before) while conservatives/Republicans are "crazy" and apparently have always spun the economy into a nose-dive and there's not enough bias in the media as to help the left-wing cause.

Did I mention this dude is a complete moron?

To Get Business Rolling in America, Get Rid of the Socialist in the White House

Steve Wynn, the Democrat entrepreneur that is credited with revitalizing Las Vegas after the ousting of the mafia in the mid-eighties, says Obama is crippling the growth of business in America and it will not improve unless he is out of office.

A Message from SarahPAC

And an absolutely inarguable one at that:

This is the same president who proposed an absurdly irresponsible budget that would increase our debt by trillions of dollars, and whose party failed to even put forward a budget in over 800 days! This is the same president who is pushing our country to the brink because of his reckless spending on things like the nearly trillion dollar “stimulus” boondoggle. This is the same president who ignored his own debt commission’s recommendations and demonized the voices of fiscal sanity who proposed responsible plans to reform our entitlement programs and rein in our dangerous debt trajectory. This is the same president who wanted to push through an increase in the debt ceiling that didn’t include any cuts in government spending! This is the same president who wants to slam Americans with tax hikes to cover his reckless spending, but has threatened to veto a bill proposing a balanced budget amendment. This is the same president who hasn’t put forward a responsible plan himself, but has rejected reasonable proposals that would tackle our debt. This is the same president who still refuses to understand that the American electorate rejected his big government agenda last November. As I said in Madison, Wisconsin, at the Tax Day Tea Party rally, “We don’t want it. We can’t afford it. And we are unwilling to pay for it.”
Now the President is outraged because the GOP House leadership called his bluff and ended discussions with him because they deemed him an obstruction to any real solution to the debt crisis.
He has been deemed a lame duck president. And he is angry now because he is being treated as such.

And he's supposed to be brilliant and she's the idiot? Riiighht.

Does This President Know ANY History?

Once again, like his gaffe-filled Vice-President, President Barack Obama has failed in his knowlege of history. But why an I surprised? He doesn't even know his own history, like when he was already born when he claimed his parents "met on that bridge in Selma." Remember?

Krauthammer: ‘This is Obama at His Most Sanctimonious, Demagogic, Self-Righteous and Arrogant’

He's right y'know.

It Must Be the Appocolypse...Well, Not Really

Why? Because left-wing sweetheart Arianna Huffington of The Huffington Post has stated that the Obamanomic "stimulus" package has failed. Well, welcome to the party Arianna. The obvious portion of tonight's festivities happened a while ago.

Of course, right after that she fell back into her Obama-loving, stimulus-supporting self; saying another is needed.
Brilliant.

Obama Blames "Splintered Media" for Lack of Compromise in Washington

He's actually right on this point. The media has a tremendous effect on the opinions of the uniformed. Regardless of what side is right or wrong, especially to those who aren't news or political junkies, a lot of people who watch the news take it as the gospel. If it's on the news it has to be true, right? Unfortunately that means the biased and opinionated views of today's MSM. If the liberals of today's crooked media say it's a fact, then it's a fact. How can anyone dispute that when the conservative side of the media is hardly allowed to air their views?

But although I whole-heartedly agree with the president on this point, the fact that he repeatedly fails to mention his own role in this mess kind of makes his comments irrelevant, as usual.

More Anti-Christian "News" from the Left

With the recent massacre in Norway by a lone "momma's boy," the mainstream media has made a point of underlining the fact that shooter Anders Breivik was a Christian "fundamentalist," yet had absolutely no problem with hiding the identification of obvious Muslim crazies in recent years.

It's funny, because as I read the MSM reports of the horrific incident, I noticed just that. The media not only had no problem in identifying Breivik's Christianity and "fundamentalism" and anti-Muslim tendencies but they seemed to go out of their way to over-indulge themselves on this point. They do this even when the suspects are not Christian-even when the suspect themselves say they're not. Not much like, but exactly like Oklahoma bomber, Timothy McViegh, who although wrote a letter claiming to be agnostic, the media continue to this day label him as a "extreme right-wing Christian."

As this true to fact article by NewsBuster's Scott Whitlock points out (and the media continually denies) the MSM wasn't so quick to identify Muslim murderers and suspects as followers of the Islamic faith. Another case in point.

The biased and agenda-driven media continue to disgust me.

UPDATE: Well, well. It appears Breivik was NOT a Christian as the MSM hoped he would be.

The overarching theme of “2083” (Breivik's "manifesto") is that he, and his confreres in the “PCCTS Knights Templar,” are modern-day Crusaders. They are not what most other Christians would call Christian; Anders is very explicit that having a relationship with Jesus Christ is not his thing. He’s a “cultural” Christian, and the PCCTS Knights Templar (expansion of PCCTS below) are happy to accept members who are, in Breivik’s words, “Christian agnostics” and “Christian atheists.” He uses “Christian” as a modifier signifying primarily Western/European cultural identity; he does speak of brotherhood with African and Asian Christians, but the context of the references is clearly cultural.
H/T to HotAir.

Nothing more to say.

CEOs: Media Mum on Obama's Socialism

If these guys were praising President Obama on his economic policies, how long would it take for the MSM to quote them infinitum? How many of them would be on the gust list of Chris Matthews and Rachel Maddow? That's right, all of them. Every single one. But since these men (some of them even Democrats and support Obama on social issues) are taking the president to task, not one word from the Obamamedia.

Perhaps Contessa Brewer can ask them if they have economic degrees, since she like to embarrass herself in trying to land "gotcha" questions with people in the know more than herself.

Bias? What bias?

Global Warming Skeptics to Recieve Less Air Time on the BBC

Nope, no bias here.
I thought science was to be debated at all times to try and prove your own hypothesis wrong. Then, only then can one be satisfied (perhaps not even then) to have the indisputable evidence to claim to have the facts.

I guess not.

Where's the Endless Stories?

Just to say I'm still waiting for the wall-to-wall coverage on Dr. Death Gosnell , aka Kermit the Killer.
I wonder if he was pro-life would he garner more media coverage? A little sarcasm, by the way. Ah, maybe he sent members of the media little "mementos" of his work that they love so much. You know, like little severed hands and feet that he kept in boxes and jars? That's probably why they're so mum about him.

Did Obama Lie about His Mother's "Fight" with Insurance Companies?

Actually, yes he did. He did it just like Al Gore did back in 1988 when he lied about taking on the tobacco companies after his sister's death from cancer in 1984. As this NewsBusters story informs us, then with Gore, just like now with Obama, the MSM had no interest whatsoever, yet were all over Sarah Palin's supposed "gaffe" about Paul Revere (which, as historians have backed her up on, was entirely accurate) It does indeed show you the level of bias and love for the DNC the media has. Yep, let's detest the party of freedom and civil rights, yet give accolades to the party of the KKK, slavery and who fought civil rights every step of the way.

How in the world does the media not only keep lying and shilling for the DNC machine when the truth is in the history books. Even as recent as 1988?

Obama is Like a Senile Old Man?

Since when did liberals start liking and respecting the late Ronald Reagan? Since when is Barack Obama like the Great Communicator? When did Obama take 49 out of 50 states in the general election? Since when has Obama did what he said he was going to do (except to promise to help kill the unborn?) When did Obama jump-start the economy to the booming levels of the 80s? What leader in the world, although they may not like "like" him, which one has publicly stated they respect Obama?

Yeah, right. He's just like Reagan.

For the whole duration of Reagan's administration the national media deplored Reagan. They fought him tooth and nail at every turn. If Obama is so much like Reagan, is Obama a war-monger? Is he senile? Does he hate women and minorities? Does he have an itchy finger on the "button?" Well, that's exactly what the MSM and their buddies in the media said about the Gipper when he was alive. Now that they are in a free-fall despite the likes of Chris Matthews and Contessa Brewer doing their ignorant best to be the elitists and perveyors of misinformation and bias for the DNC and the second coming of Jimmy Carter; they want everyone to forget everything they said about Reagan now that they can't sell Obama's economic policies to the people. Why? Because even they know he's a failure at convincing the people he's the saviour his minions have claimed him to be. Once again, he's not what people voted for. He's in the White House due to what his supporters thought who he would be.

And I never heard Reagan say he would not seek a second term if he was ineffectual in his first. I guess since Obama has started campaigning for 2012 that he's lied again. Another thing that proves he's worlds apart from Reagan.

CNN's Piers Morgan Comes Clean about Ties to Murdoch's Newspaper

"...the story making headlines around the world. The phone hacking scandal rocking News Corporation, the company led by Rupert Murdoch. It's a world I know very well. I was editor of two major British tabloid newspapers for 11 years. I worked for News Corp as editor of the News the World 16 years ago from 1994 to 1995. I was also editor for the Daily Mirror, a paper not owned by Rupert Murdoch, from 1995 to 2004. For the record, I do not believe that any story we published in either title was ever gained in a unlawful manner, nor have I ever seen anything to suggest that. But the experience running those papers does give me a pretty good insight into how Rupert Murdoch operates both when you work for and against him. In fact, I wrote a detailed book about my time as an editor called "The Insider: Private Diaries of a Scandalous Decade."
"I mean I can say from my experience editing a newspaper for him – and this was, you know, five, six years before any of this phone hacking began – but certainly when I worked for him, he wanted his editors to be tough, to be ruthless, to be aggressive, all the things you'd expect from a tabloid newspaper – but always to operate within the law," Morgan emphasized."And I find it impossible, personally, knowing the man, to believe that he would have known about law-breaking on his newspapers, let alone he would condone it."-Piers Morgan, host of CNN's Piers Morgan Tonight.

Look out Piers. The liberal media establishment will have your head now. How dare he defend the most evil man on the planet?

No Serious Plans to Cut Spending by Obama Yet Media Tout Him as "Budget Cutter"

Every Democrat in Congress and every liberal in the media all jumped on Rep. Paul Ryan for his conservative budget plan as being "evil," "recession expanding," "unthoughtful," "racist" and a slew of other unsubstantiated accusations while they have contributed exactly zero, zip, nada, zillch to the economic woes of the country. That is unless you consider extending unemployment and the deficit to astronomical levels as "contributing."

But yet the national media continues, unabated, to reap praises on this ineffectual Commander-in-Chief as a "centrist budget-cutter," as he relentlessly continues to add to the countries economic woes.

"As Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) explained to CBS's Bob Schieffer on Sunday's "Face the Nation," Obama has paid lip service to the idea of deficit reduction, but hasn't put a serious plan to cut spending down on paper. Nevertheless, the media continue to advance the narrative that the president is a disciplined budget cutter."
-Alex Fitzsimmons, NewsBusters

CNN Continues to Put Obama on A Pedestal

This time they claim due to yet another drawn-out speech by President Obama's on Monday that "there's significant progress on the debt ceiling," and that there is "renewed hopes that U.S. lawmakers would be able to break their stalemate and strike a deficit-reduction deal in time to avert a catastrophic government default."

Tim Blumer at NewsBusters said it best,
"According to CNN, USA Today obviously had no idea what it was talking about. Investors don't look at silly things like reported earnings results at key companies. No-no-no. What matters is what Barack Obama does on any given day. Today it was his "boost," and only his "boost," which drove the markets to their best day in eight months.
Annalyn Censky's related report at CNNMoney.com is an embarrassment."

"Question for CNN: Was this before or after he parted the Red Sea, began cooling the earth, and made water into wine?
Unfortunately for Obama's minions at CNN, hours before Obama spoke, the Dow opened about 115 points higher than yesterday's close and basically held steady until the president appeared. Roughly 55% of the day's gains were already there when Obama worked his alleged magic."

Obama Misleads the Press Corp about Tax Hike Support

By the way, that's pronounced "press core," not "corps."

Once again, somehow, for some reason, the current president of the United States has misled the press yet again and that same press took the B.S. and ran with it, totally oblivious (as usual) towards their own malfeasance as a Democrat propaganda machine.

What is it with the left and polls? Clearly not every poll is entirely accurate, while some never really have been and will continue that path with the Dems salivating over every twisted, biased outcome. That may be alright for people who don't pay all that much attention or who are totally oblivious themselves about politics, history and the modern media. But for someone as reportedly intelligent as Barack Obama, the President of the United States no less, cherry-picking data, or telling the ignorant or indifferent misleading information; isn't this the same kind of thing Bush was raked over the coals about concerning WMDs?

Ah. the Obamamedia. Is there anything they won't report about their Dear Leader? Other than his Jimmy Carter-like failures?

Biographer of Obama's Mother Won't Discuss Debunking of His Health Insurance Falsehood

More alleged lies by President Obama about his mother and Obamacare? Ouch. How will the press ever cover thi...right. Nevermind.

Mahr's Misogynistic Hatred Finds Fault from No One

Do I really need to show more examples of the mainstream hatred, intolerance, ignorance and just plain stupidity of the left yet again? Well, no. Not really. But just to show you the infinite hypocrite and misogynistic hatred of women that ultra dork, Bill Maher is, check out not only his vitriol (and by extension that of his liberal loon-adoring audience) and his general all-out creepiness, but also his certain guest who happens to be gay and is apparently the most tolerant person in the world..like most who think they're entitled to hate and everyone else must accept that Perez Hilton "I Hate You Because You Don't Agree With My Views" mentality.

It's Bush's Fault! Claim # 1.6 Trillion

Actually it's the Associated Press' claim that Bush 43's tax cuts were the main reason the national debt rose to 1.6 trillion dollars. They even have list of "debt contributors." This whole thing pretty much started in 2006 right? Um, who was in control of Congress when the bottom fell out? Who vetoed President Bush's banking and housing regulations? Who has been president since, raising the debt substantially since due to out-of-control spending?

Really? All together now...IT'S BUSH'S FAULT!!!

FOX Proves Them Wrong Again

You can't argue with a lefty. We all know that. From their insane, off-topic analogies to their gathering of information from a satirist, there's hardly any common sense libs out there to fill a Volkswagen.

Of course, it goes without saying that the left is on fire over the whole News of the World/Rupert Murdoch debacle going on in Europe. I predict nothing substantial will come of this. Murdoch will not go to jail as all the left is fervently waiting/hoping on, although the people responsible for hacking into private citizens cell phones are disgusting and should be eating their meals on a tin tray for the next foreseeable few years; especially the piece of dung that hacked into a young girl's phone that had been kidnapped and murdered, giving her parents reason to believe she may have been still alive.

And with all this comes the predictable and usually untrue allegations against FOX News. This time it's that they are not covering this story because it is owned by News Corp, a Murdoch holding. Such was the case on CNN when Howard Kurtz chastised FOX for doing that very thing (or not doing it, depending on how you see it.) Greta Van Sustren, a liberal on FOX (like Sheppard Smith-how many conservatives are on MSNBC or the networks?) would have none of it.

As for Kurtz's "report" on how many stories were done on what network, are there people who really take The Mess seriously? Do you believe for one second that MSNBC would not jump all over this? Is it not pretty much the only story they've been running? And of course, quite bluntly, are they to believed? With their record, I say Hell no! I mean it's not like they're above editing video and quotes or lying altogether are they?

*Snicker*

We'll see their excuses when Murdoch is personally found not guilty (if he's even indicted on anything at all) and FOX News continues to beat the crap out of the left in the ratings. Which is all this about for the MSM. They NEED FOX out of the way so they a) can go back to being the leaders in the ratings with their bias and distortion and b) so that they can resume misinforming the country and the world about how the Democrats and their insincere ways are good for them whether they like it or not, can continue unabated like after Watergate when the press seized on a scandal that to this very day reads like Animal Farm...Democrats good, Republicans bad. Every time, all the time. No matter the Democrat scandal of the day. What are the odds, huh?

Obama Alleged Temper Tantrum and Walk Out

Not surprising as we all know that President Obama is a thin-skinned narcissist that can't take the slightest bit of constructive criticism and has done it before. But when Rep. Eric Cantor (VA) told the president that "the two sides remain so far apart at this point that he doubted they could get to $2.5 trillion in cuts (to match the debt increase requested by the administration, enough to get through the 2012 election) given the time available. President Obama has said he will not sign any increase to the debt ceiling less than that amount, and Cantor had previously insisted that the House would vote no more than one time to increase the debt limit."

Then the president, as Cantor recalls, "became 'very agitated' and said he had 'sat here long enough,' that 'Ronald Reagan wouldn’t sit here like this' and 'something’s got to give.' Obama then told Republicans they either needed to compromise on their insistence on a dollar for dollar ratio of spending cuts to debt increase or agree to a 'grand bargain' including massive tax increases. Before walking out of the room, Cantor said, the president told him: 'Eric, don’t call my bluff. I’m going to the American people with this.' He then 'shoved back' and said 'I’ll see you tomorrow.'"

Sounds like a walk-out to me. Although in the president's defense, when he said "Ronald Reagan wouldn't sit here like this," you know he probably would not have. Of course The Gipper would have just left without whining about it.

Food "Czar" Michelle Obama Enjoys Another Junk Food Buffet

Well, at least you and you're kids aren't free to enjoy yourselves.
Her excuse, made by Connie Diekman, director of university nutrition at Washington University in St. Louis?
"It is good to see that even someone as committed to health as the first lady knows that healthy eating is about balance not perfection."

Uh huh.

Obama: Unemployment is "Evidence" that $830-Billion "Stimulus" Legislation Worked

Wait. So then job-stealing ATMs and airport kiosks were a result of the stimulus and therefore helped unemployment ?

The Second Living Recipient of the Medal of Honor Awarded by President Obama

Sgt. Leroy Petry of the United States Army is the second living recipient of the Medal of Honor since Staff Sgt. Sal Giunta recieved it in October of last year.
Check out what this guy is made of.

Al Gore Has A Problem

That is other than being an opportunist tool.

As you probably know, former Vice-President Al Gore is having a little trouble getting smart people to believe his Global Warming myths that will ultimately line his pockets with government subsidies and Cap & Trade benefits.

So now he's announced a new campaign to bilk people he missed the first time around.
*You may notice the article itself is already on Gore's side and the author seems a little too anxious to help spread the news. The second and fourth paragraphs bare that out.

The Utter Hypocrisy of Lawrence O'Donnell

I don't know why I waste my time with these MSNBC clowns. Really, there isn't a genuine intellectual among them.
Lawrence O'Donnell, the resident, self-admitted Socialist went on a rampage denouncing his usual liberal brethren at Newsweek magazine for "selling out" to Sarah Palin. Apparently O'Donnell chose to ignore the past Newsweek stories that attempted to put her in a bad light. And he definitely chose to ignore all the fawning articles on President Obama from Newsweek, Time, Rolling Stone, People, The New York times, Slate, The New Yorker, Vanity Fair, Us Weekly, O (Oprah Winfrey's magazine), not to mention Ebony, Atlanta Tribune, The Baltimore Afro-American, Jet (although the latter four are at least understandable) and many more when he was candidate Obama. Remember the halo shots and softball interviews?

But if one interviewer from one magazine decides to take the road less travelled and actually doesn't try to destroy her, O'Donnell whines like a child.
"...she would have no hesitation in shunning media outlets she does not trust. That means Newsweek had to make promises to her to get her trust."

I guess O'Donnell and his ilk only trust magazines that pledge allegiance to Obama.

Rupert Murdoch Scandal Breaks in Europe

"Popular anger has spread in the UK over allegations that reporters and private investigators working for the Rupert Murdoch-owned News of the World may have hacked the phone messages of thousands of people, from celebrities and royals to victims of brutal crimes and their family members, icluding that of missing teen, Milly Dowler.

Democrat senator, John Rockefeller has called for an investigation into Murdoch’s News Corp, which owns FOX News to see if the illegal tactics have been used in the U.S.
Britain has asked Murdoch to appear before a committee of MP's to answer questions about his knowledge (or lack thereof) involving the scandal.

Of course Murdoch has not been accused of anything, much less indicted, but do I need to say the left is already joyfully measuring him for an orange jumpsuit? Maybe Nancy Grace can ask him accusatory questions and convict him early with no evidence against him on behalf of the left. She's good at that.

The Debt Ceiling Debate is the Republicans Fault Although Obama Lied about the Facts

Once again president Obama is playing fast and loose with the facts to receive the pity and admiration of the media to sell his case to the American people for Congress to raise the debt ceiling.
Obama told CBS news, "I cannot guarantee that those checks go out on August 3rd if we haven't resolved this issue. Because there may simply not be the money in the coffers to do it." In essence the media jumped all over this and didn't bat an eye or have yet to question the president on the validity of his numbers. News anchor Scott Pelley sure didn't.

Of course this gave the lefties in the media the green light to do Obama's bidding and to smear Republicans at every given turn. You've heard all the arguments so far right?
"Is there any way this deal gets done without the Republicans compromising somewhat on taxes?" Matt Laurer asked Laura Ingram. MSNBC's Morning Joe co-host, Mika Brzezinski said, "I think the Republicans look stupid and mean." Newsweek editor, Tina brown said of the Republicans, "I think they’re the suicide bombers in all of this." Also, the Republicans are now "scorched Earth' leaders that "want to destroy everything."

And so on. That's just a smidgen of the Obamedia doing their usual part to raise the president to the level of a demigod once again. Nothing has changed since the days of Ronald Reagan as president or Newt Gingrich:

"The American people have failed to realize that they have a responsibility in all of this. But one of the reasons is that for ten years, Republicans in the White House, first Ronald Reagan and then George Bush, have been telling them they don't have to pay for what they get." -- Andrea Mitchell, October 12, 1990 Nightly News.

"Many of those interviewed described the budget dilemma as partisan war, with the Democratic Congress trying valiantly to protect the interests of the little people against a pull-out-all-the-stops assault on spending by Daddy-Warbucks Republicans."-- Washington Post staff writer Guy Gugliotta in October 6, 1990 news story on public reaction as gauged by Post reporters.

Bob Squier, Democratic Strategist: "I think that it was a game of chicken. I think what you had was Gingrich, who is supposed to be part of the leadership, leading people literally out of the deal."
Bryant Gumbel: "Acting irresponsibly...Is this the legacy of Ronald Reagan politics, I mean, feel-good politics of the '80s, no-responsibility politics of the '80s?"Roger Ailes, Republican Strategist: "I think that's a misnomer..."
Gumbel: "But weren't the '80s about spending what we didn't have? And that was Ronald Reagan."-- Exchange on Today, October 5, 1990.

Like I said, nothing has changed in the eyes of the liberal media. EVERYTHING is the Republicans fault.
Of course, they all have chosen to ignore the actual numbers, provided by CNSNews.com via the official Treasury Reports.
Official Treasury Reports: Coffers Full Enough to Cover Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans, Federal Salaries and Interest—Without Borrowing a Dime

Does anyone in the media do their frickin' jobs anymore?

What really gets me is the media still want to shill for this failing president when their hero and "brilliant" economist that the left dreams him to be (at the expense of the unemployed and deficit) has triple the deficit, wants to raise the debt ceiling to cover his failings and then, of course, blame everything on the GOP. You know the media will do everything they can to make that dream a reality, but with rampant unemployment, and an ever-growing deficit; will the American people fall for it again. I mean other than lefty ignoramuses?

Brashear Sure Belongs at MSNBC

He may not be as arrogant, ignorant, vitriolic and hateful as former Mess "anchor" Kieth Olbermann, but he sure fits the bill with his ignorance and creativity.

Once again the man who accused Andrew Breitbart of racism (surprise!) by way of guilt by association and smears every conservative in that oh-so-British "charm," Martin Brashear showed his true ignorance when he not only colossally failed to understand the meaning of the slang term "sugar-daddy," but at the same time-as they do daily at The Mess-he tried to ignite a false scandal about Sarah Palin by twisting her words and making up a racist analogy towards President Obama. Again...surprise! Watch the video clip and you can see how effortlessly and consciously he attempts to smear Palin with more lefty B.S. and how happy his guest, Goldie Taylor is to advance the meme (because apparently she doesn't now the meaning of "sugar-daddy" is either) that, once again, Palin (along with all conservatives) is/are racist.

The story is here via NewsBusters. Can Brashear even read or is his bias so great that he really does fail at reading comprehension? Palin was clearly saying the tax-payers are the sugar daddies supporting the obscene overspending by the Obama government. Anybody with half a brain can see that. But then again, we are talking about a liberal here. But that's what they do. They make up smears and scandals where there are none.

He's not only got a "search and destroy" mentality when it comes to Palin, but Brashear clearly is on a mission to destroy Michelle Bachmann as well. As per usual with far-left liberals, when they can't deal with debating the issues, because, well, they can't; they resort to character assassination. Palin has sure seen her fair share of unfairness and gross incompetence on the part of the MSM, but let it not be said that Brashear isn't an equal opportunity biased hater. He now wants to start the purposely innacurate smear campaign of saying Bachmann wants "a return to the days of slavery." Nermind that that's exactly what the left has been doing to the black community for decades (if not centuries-look at the Democrat treatment of blacks before, during and even after the Civil war) by keeping them down, insisting they're hapless victims of the racist right and can't do anything without help from the left (which has worked brilliantly in Democrat-government-run municipalities-Detroit immediately comes to mind)

As the first story states at the end, You can see why he fits in so well at MSNBC.

The Continuing, Unreported Hypocrisy of Matthews the "Thrill Boy"

Nothin' for nothin', but just to show you the continuing arrogance, ignorance and hypocrisy of Chris Tingle; he thought he was pulling a funny for all his liberal drones when he made fun of Texas governor Rick Perry with a spectacular sixth grade "joke" about Perry calling Twitter "Tweeter." Yeah, let's try and discredit anyone we can with an "R" after their name because of typos and misspeaks. Who else does that with an amazingly against-the-odds continuity? Your president and Vice-President of course. But there's no fun in reporting the constant and idiotic gaffes of the man you swore to "help look good" now is there?

The problem for Chrissy is he made the exact same gaffe Perry did, but of course with no acknowledgement form the Tingle Man.

And the beat goes on...

Global Warming Alarmists Have All the Answers

Now it's China's fault that the Earth isn't melting.

Let's see...

CFCs...nope. Try...
Animal defecation...um, well we can't blame humans on that, so no. How about...
the Sun...hmm, no. That's probably what's actually causing this so-called "man-made" problem, so we can't use that.

Well then certainly we can blame the CO2's emitting naturally from the oceans, right? No, because that would be more accurate and how do we guilt people into a Cap & Trade situation and line our pockets with "research grants?" So that's out.

O.k. then, we'll just scare people's children with tales of drowning polar bears that are an endangered species and certainly that would have to guilt their parents into falling in line. What do you mean polar bears are not endangered? What? The term "threatened species" doesn't work either? Well I guess when the polar bear population has grown approximately 25 percent since 1974, that really wouldn't work either. We could always lie about that one I suppose.

Don't worry, it's not like anybody is going to leak any e-mails exposing our grand fraud, so we'll just get the national media to fall in line and have a popular Democrat be a hypocrite on energy consumption and use his celebrity status (you'll remember he "won" a Nobel Peace prize and an Oscar too. Not to mention he invented the internet and he and his wife Tipper were the inspiration for the movie Endless Love) so who in their right mind wouldn't believe him?
No? Nobody believes him either? Man, this is harder than we thought. I thought you said everyone was just going to fall in line here.

Ah, screw it. We'll just blame China.

The Big Lie: "A History of Israel" or "The True History of 'Palestine'"

A great video by David Horowitz. Unfortunately I couldn't embed this one because it's been flagged (apparently as "offensive" I assume by pro-"Palestinian" idiots) and I don't feel like joining the "YouTube Community" just to post a video that should be accessible by all. If it's so offensive (say, for instance a porn video) it shouldn't have been uploaded in the first place.
But you can find it here (uploaded in 2009-don't ask why I didn't find it sooner)

Obama and the Democrats Hate God

Even if you don't believe in all mighty creator, what right does that give the President of the United States to omit the term from the Declaration of Independence?
Given that this is only about two weeks since NBC omitted the term "under God" twice from the Pledge of Allegiance, it shows that the Obama administration and the MSM are indeed on the same page. We know the press hates Catholicism, but don't you think the president should sustain from such open bias and atheistic practices?

And if you need reminding of Obama's contemptment for Christianity, remember he had the monogram IHS in Georgetown, whose letters spell out the name of Jesus, and which normally perches above the stage in Gaston Hall where the president spoke, covered up before giving a speech there back in April 2009.

Chris Matthews: Older White People are Bigots

Surely even Matthews doesn't mean all older whites, but believe it or not, I actually agree with Matthews...for once.
I've been saying this for years. Of course race relations have improved dramatically over the years and if you disagree with that, quite simply you're a fool. And I don't agree with Matthews on his overall theory, since like all his liberal brethren, he sees racism around every single corner and is an excuse for any minority running roughshod with the law.

However, apart from Matthews omitting the racism of young blacks (which most liberals think simply doesn't exist, or if they do, it's with "good reason") my theory goes: it's the old whites and young blacks that are the most racist, while the least racist are the old blacks and young whites. Pretty sound I think.

Obama Illegally Funds ACORN

Surprised? Why would you be? What would you expect from a guy who started his career in the living room of a anti-American, domestic terrorist? Or a guy that believes Socialism will save the American economy (that he and his fellow Dems helped to stagnate) through "spreading the wealth" that he and his cronies would be exempt from?

This is a president that has repeatedly defied Congress and the Constitution. For a guy that was a supposed "Constitutional scholar," he sure doesn't know very much about it. That's probably because he and his fellow liberals don't like it's very existence, so they act like it doesn't exist.

Why do Democrats tempt impeachment so much?

Obama-A Crackheads Best Friend

Never fear crackheads and dealers. Obama to the rescue!
*sigh*

Texan Wins 'White Man' Scholarship

A controversial non-profit organization announced it has awarded the second of five academic scholarships to a Texas man. Among the criteria: the recipient must be white and male.

There's that label again, "controversial." Whenever there's something going on that doesn't involve immigrants, minorities or Democrats (sometime all three) it's "controversial." If it emanates from the left it's "progressive." What's so progressive about "reverse" racism? (although racism is racism, so I never understood that term)

But what's the big deal about this? If there are scholarships to help poor or educationally under-developed minorities (black-only scholarships, for example-not to mention Black Entertainment Television (BET) and the ESPY Awards and Black History month-which I agree with actor Morgan Freeman on when he asked isn't Black History month a part of U.S. history?) Why can't there be a award for the most qualified Caucasian? Not that I have a problem with any of the others. What I do have a big problem with is when anybody but minorities are rewarded for a job well done or for simply be a gifted scholastic Caucasian, then labeled as a racist. Or at least the institution that handed out said award is.

Everybody talks about equality. That's it. They talk about it. But when equality actually rears it's head, all of a sudden it's racism. When does this madness end?

‘Stimulus’ Has Cost $278,000 per Job

"...the “Seventh Quarterly Report” on the economic impact of the “stimulus,” released on Friday, July 1, provides further evidence that President Obama’s economic “stimulus” did very little, if anything, to stimulate the economy, and a whole lot to stimulate the debt."

Duh. What else is new?

Those Racist Hindus

Well, isn't this different? How will the left spin this one? How will they lay the racism card on the Hindu community (who have a very valid point?) without revealing their own obvious racist tendencies and excuses?

Lefties and Their Libidos

I thought today I'd let Ezra Levant from the liberal Toronto Sun tell about his digust at the hypocrisy and entitlement of the left who claim to respect and prtect "women's rights," yet when they feel they're alone with them (whether in their hotels, the White House or by Twitter) they do everthing that they claim conservatives do. Nothing new really. But to have this piece come via the Toronto Sun (well, anything eminating out of Toronto, really the bastion of Canadian liberalism) is amazing in and of itself. Of course that amazing feat is kind of diluted knowing that the author, Levant is a conservative. But that just means you're going to be truly informed.

Happy Fourth of July

235 years and counting.

Maxine's Birdfeeder

A friend sent his to me via e-mail. It would be funnier if it wasn't so accurate.
The Canadian system is not all unlike the American system. There are those here that want to change things for the worse as well. The Canadian government has even less qualms about losing it's nation's identity and culture too. If there is one left to lose at this point. Sorry about the spacing. For some reason I can't fix it in the HTML.

I bought a bird feeder. I hung it on my back porch and filled it with seed. What a beauty of a bird feeder it is, as I filled it lovingly with seed. Within a week we had hundreds of birds taking advantage of the continuous flow of free and easily accessible food.

But then the birds started building nests in the boards of the patio, above the table and next to the barbecue.



>Then came the shit. It was everywhere: on the patio tile, the chairs, the table... Everywhere!



>Then some of the birds turned mean. They would dive bomb me and try to peck me even though I had fed them out of my own pocket.



>And others birds were boisterous and loud. They sat on the feeder and squawked and screamed at all hours of the day and night and demanded that I fill it when it got low on food.



>After a while, I couldn't even sit on my own back porch anymore! So I took down the bird feeder and in three days the birds were gone. I cleaned up their mess and took down the many nests they had built all over the patio.



>Soon, the back yard was like it used to be... Quiet, serene and no one demanding their rights to a free meal.



>Now let's see... Our Canadian government gives out free food, subsidized housing, free medical care, free education and allows anyone born here to be an automatic Citizen.



>Then the illegals came by the tens of thousands. Suddenly our taxes went up to pay for free services; small apartments are housing 5 families; you have to wait 6 hours to be seen by an emergency room doctor; your child's 2nd grade class is Behind other schools because over half the class doesn't speak English.

Corn Flakes now come in a bilingual box; I have to 'press one' to hear my bank talk to me in English, and people waving flags other than the 'Canadian Maple Leaf Flag' are squawking and screaming in the streets, demanding more rights and free liberties.

Just my opinion, but maybe it's time for the government to take down the bird feeder. .. If you agree, pass it on; if not, continue cleaning up the shit!