Obamacare Fallout: Americans and GOP Lie, Dems Honest As Day Is Long

So not only does Weasel Harry Reid think that they shouldn't either care, nor treat children with cancer, he also maintains that Americans suffering through the horrors of the failed Obamacare roll-out are simply lying.  That's right, American citizens concerned with higher health insurance premiums, unemployment and a rising deficit, not being able to keep their insurance plans or doctors, all due to Obamacare, are liars.

Reid, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, Rep. Loretta Sasnchez (D) and all the other conformist, died-in-the-wool liberal Obamaphiles really hate their constituents.  If they didn't, number one, they wouldn't consistently lie to them (yeah, yeah politicians and all that) number two, they would resign and let someone perhaps younger try and dig out the mess they have made for the past 40 plus years to at least try and make the country better.  It's all about creating blame for the Republicans when the Dems inept plans and "best intentions" go awry as they always do.

What Would Be

As usual, the liberal media is helping cover up Democrat scandals by omitting them from their nightly newscasts.  By omitting I mean not telling us what political party they belong to.  And if they don't tell you what party they belong to, you know by default, they are Democrats.  We all know just exactly how long it would take to report Republicans in the same situations.  About 2.6 seconds.

If a Republican were in office, guess how the media would be associating his leadership with that of his party's scandals.  Pretty much like this.  Did you know former New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin, convicted on a bribary scandal, is a Democrat?  You should.  He's the same mayor that ballyhooed about racism, along with such spoiled and petulant racist celebrities like Kanye West, over Hurricane Katrina while George W. Bush was in office.  But if you do, I'll bet you didn't learn it from the MSM.

Par for the course from the nation's so-called media.

Kobe Bryant Hated for Not Being Synchophant

This is what happens when a black man wanders off the liberal-established plantation.  Los Angeles Lakers star Kobe Bryant recently gave his opinion on the knee-jerk reaction to the Trayvon Martin shooting by the African-American community.  It seems Bryant doesn't think as a black man, he should instantaneously call for the head of George Zimmerman or send a lynch mob after him as the world's biggest racist Al Sharpton and the Black Panthers did with the backing of the President of the Untied States and his Attorney General, Eric Holder.

Kevin Sorbo: Conservative Actor Speaks His Mind

I'm really not one on celebrity testimonials on anything.  Even if I agree with a lot of what say Clint Eastwood, Robert Duvall, Chuck Norris or yes, even Ted Nugent has to say.  I take it with a grain of salt.  I mean all those loony libs in Hollywood really make me want to wretch.  So to be fair, I don't really put too much stock in their opinions.

But recently actor Kevin Sorbo sat down and did an interview with Steve Malzbeg on his show.  It's today's conservative reality in a liberal Hollywood and a liberal Washington.

Abortion Enthusiests Mock Abortion Survivors with Violence and Bullying

And one of the bullies is (surprise, surprise) not only a lefty, but a doctor, no less.

Imagine a "pro-choice" (which really should be pro-death) rally being invaded by pro-life advocates.  How long do you think it would take the national media to swoop down like the vultures they are to cover a poor, Planned Parenthood (which really should be called Planned Genocide) crowd when some mean ol' pro-lifer took their signs (a clear violation of Second Amendment rights) and physically taunted them to take it back?  It would be wall-to-wall coverage that night and probably the next few evenings.

But as it is and as it usually is, the national media is mum on rights of others who don't share their baby-killing left-wing beliefs.

Zimmerman's Parents Sue Elitist Celebrity for Endangerment

George Zimmerman's parents are suing big-mouth, yet highly ignorant and disrespectful, not to mention anti-Semitic, self-hating Jew and soon-to-be-irrelevant Roseanne (Barr, Arnold, whatever) for Tweeting their private, personal address and demanding in a follow-up tweet, "If Zimmerman isn't arrested I'll rt (re-tweet) his address again — maybe go 2 his house myself."

Of course, all this hatred and incitement to violence was totally ignored by the authorities (and the Zimmerman-hating media) because left-wing violence is a-o.k.

I hope she goes into hock.

More Liberal Fascism

Don't try and support the Second Amendment in New York.    A 16-year-old student in Grand Island found out that you can't fight the moonbat liberal establishment in New York's "progressive" Shangri-La, even if you are supporting the law of the land.

Dumb-Dumb-Dumb-Dumb...DUMB!!!

Here's somethoing that I'll bet you won't see reported on MSNBC or probably none of the network news telecasts, Rep, Shiela Lee Jackson (D) has never been mistaken as being one of the sharpest tools in the shed, and for all you Palin-haters out there, at least she knows how old the Constitution is.

Apparently Jackson-Lee does not.  And she apparently doesn't either care or respect (that's r-e-s-p-e-c-t) about her staffers.  How many left-wing pundits will be pointing this out?  How about exactly none.  And no, this isn't the first time.
Lefties, when it comes to calling someone stupid, really, clean up your own yard.

Progressive Racism: The Motives

Everyone with half a brain with an affinity for the truth has to look no further than their local library and history books to see the rampant historical racism innate in the Democrat party.  I've catalogued it before, so no need to replay it again (although it does give me joy to continually expose the cretins for what they were, are and will continue to be.)

Over at PJ Media, there's a really good and highly entertaining piece on the continued racism of the "progressive" left.  The (not so)Hidden Motive Driving Modern (liberal) Politics.

As Obvious As Obvious Can Be

Judge Jeanine asks did president Barack Obama lie to get into the White House?  Well, duh!  They all pretty much do, but usually it doesn't come back to bite them on the backside.  Even with the media in your back pocket.

Illegal Campaign Contributor for Mayor Gray Also Donated to Obama, Hillary

As always when it comes to the democrats and their base, no news is good news.  And since Jeffery Thompson made illegal contributions to the presidential campaigns of both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, the networks didn't seem to fins time to mention it.  As per usual when it comes to the propaganda arms of the Democrat party, until they compare notes and can come up with a way to spin/defend it, omission is the way to go.

Phony Calls Palin A Moron

So she's been right about the inexperience of Obama.  She's been right about his phony celebrity status. She's been right about "blood libel."  She's was right about Paul Revere.  She was right about the rollout of Obamacare, she was (or at least is going to be) right about it's "death panels" and she was right about the Ukraine and Obama's fecklessness.  She had an 80 percent approval rate as the governor of Alaska.  She fought and defeated corruption of both parties in that state and had more administrative experience going into the '08' election than all participants combined.  That includes Obama, Biden and John McCain himself.  One proven governor versus two life-long senators and one very inexperienced one that was a senator for barely two years.

The useless idiots on the left love to project.  We all know that.  So when a phony plagiariser like Mike Barnicle calls an accomplished woman like Sarah Palin (who, to his credit, Joe Scarborough reminded his bubble-headed co-host, Mika Brzezinski that Palin is in fact an intelligent woman when she piled onto Barnicle's misogynistic comment) it really exposes their overall mentality.  I mean still with the "I can see Russia from my house" crap?  They know she didn't say it, they know it was coined by Tina Fey on an SNL in a parody, but they still attribute it to her.  Chris Matthews gets all in a tiff when the right reminds him of his "thrill up my leg" comment (which the right harasses him with "tingle"-which is a lot more fun) so why does the former persist?  All in all, when she's proven to be correct by historians, proven to be right in her ascertation of Obama's inexperience and foreign policy weakness and has from the moment Obama declared his candidacy.

I would absolutely love phonies like Barnicle and Brzezinski to have a debate with Palin on issues of the day and watch them get destroyed.  Even Vice President Joe Biden and Democrat strategist James Carville say Palin has always been mistreated by the press (in Carville's case, having a conservative wife may have helped him see through the liberal haze) and has been unfairly characterised.  The more she exposes them, the more they fear her and the more that forces them to make inaccurate and potentially libellous accusations and falsehoods for their fellow lemmings to gestate and regurgitate at will.

Speaking of liberal lemmings smearing Palin, the aforementioned Chris Tingle once again showed how much of a moron and sh*t disturber he is.

That's the formula for the left on Palin (or anybody they really don't like, agree with or fear)  Don't debate, denigrate.

More "Hate-Crime" Hoaxes

It never ends does it?  Ann Coulter and the like are going to have afield day with this.  As they should. Speaking of Coulter; this kind of gives her and her book, "Mugged," a little more credibility I would say.  Except of course from those who call her a racist for pointing out fake racism.

How Many Can You Name?

How many accomplishments of Hillary Clinton can her own base and supporters name?  If you guessed zero, you'd be correct.  You figure somebody would have accidently named someone's accomplicements, but to not come up with one, just one?
There's a reason for that, folks.

Columbia University: FOX More Balanced than MSNBC

Really?  Duh!

As if anyone who watches more than five minutes of either network can tell you, raging lunatics camouflaged as "rhode scholars" and "reverends" preaching division and hate (mostly with red herrings as a starter point) does not a balanced "news network" make.

Now a new report comes out of Columbia University (not exactly a bastion of conservatism, that once invited Iran's former president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to speak on "non-existent" homosexuality) that surmises FOX News is more balanced than MSNBC.  Again, not exactly news given the last 14 years or so.  It's simple really.  Just count the number of lefties on FOX compared to the number of Righties on MSNBC.  I promise it will only take you a second or two to find the conservatives on MSNBC.  S.E. Cupp and maybe Joe Scarborough.  That's it.  On FOX, just off the top of my head?  Kirstin Powers, Sheppard Smith, Geraldo Rivera, Bob Beckel, Juan Williams, Susan Estrich and now James Carville.  I would say THAT is a little unbalanced on the FOX side.

Yeah, it's about ratings.  It is a business after all.  But just as a bonus, FOX still out-truths their rivals (if not even by a "smidgen")  Is it journalism or facts their viewers tune in to see?  Well, that's another discussion. But I can say with certainty that MSNBC viewers don't watch that network to be informed.  Otherwise, they would be.

Another Radical in the White House

Abraham Lincoln (and most certainly Ronald Reagan) must be spinning in their graves.
I forgot to post about this.   Has anyone met the new radical/terrorist now employed by the Obama administration?  And by "new," I mean another.

I suppose this is o.k. with you lefties as well?  When will you people get a freakin' clue!?

So Why Isn't Anybody Talking About This?

Oh right.  It's about a Democrat.  And not just any Democrat, but the mighty Hillary Clinton.  Good job media.  Way to lose even more credibility and trust of the public, if that's even possible.

By the way, I know this is old news, but that's more the reason to ask why no one is at least looking into this. And I don't mean anyone from the networks, CNN or MSNBC, because, gee, guess which way that would go?

Apparently Jerry Zeifman didn't actually fire Shrillary.  As he was quoted as saying, "If I had the power to fire her, I would have fired her."  But according to the transcript below from a 2008 edition of The Neal Boortz radio show below, Zeifman says he did in fact "terminate her along with some others who were no longer needed."
Either way, Zeifman thought Clinton was unprofessional, unethical and a liar.  So, "at this point, what difference does it make" who fired her?  She was relieved from her duties because she did what she did and continues to do the same.  Same lack of character, same lack of morals and same actions of illegality.  She's still doing the same unethical, dishonest, things she did her entire professional life.  How can anyone, anyone listen to anything the witch has to say?  Certainly not any family members of the victims of the Benghazi attack or anyone else who expects honesty, compassion and principles from a wannabe leader.

From the April 2 edition of Cox Radio Syndication's The Neal Boortz Show:

BOORTZ: As I understand it now, Hillary Clinton, when she was counsel on the Judiciary Committee, knew -- because you told her -- that there was precedent for the person being investigated -- in this case Richard Nixon -- to be represented by counsel during the investigation. You told her that there were documents in the public file of the committee that illustrated this fact that he was entitled to counsel. Did she then remove those documents from the public file?

ZEIFMAN: Yes, she removed them. And she brought them to her office, which was in another building and it was secured; it was not accessible to the public.

BOORTZ: Did she do that to keep other people from seeing those documents?

ZEIFMAN: Oh, well. I assume so, yeah.

BOORTZ: Yeah. Now, Richard Nixon resigned, and do you think that his resignation, before you proceeded with the investigation, do you think that might have saved Hillary Clinton's legal career?

ZEIFMAN: Uh --

BOORTZ: Because the judge never saw her memorandum that she prepared?

ZEIFMAN: No. No, I can't speculate about that. I -- my point, however, let me put it this way.

BOORTZ: OK.

ZEIFMAN: At that time, to be very frank, I really had a kind of compassion for Hillary. She was a pleasant enough young lady, and she certainly treated me with respect and courtesy. And in retrospect, she was corrupted, and I think that was a tragedy.

BOORTZ: You fired her, didn't you?

ZEIFMAN: Well, let me put it this way. I terminated her, along with some other staff members who were -- we no longer needed, and advised her that I would not -- could not recommend her for any further positions.

BOORTZ: Why not?

ZEIFMAN: Because of her unethical conduct.

BOORTZ: Now, to get this on the record, you are now, were then, and you are a lifelong Democrat, are you not?

ZEIFMAN: Yes, very much so.

BOORTZ: How do you feel about her candidacy for president of the United States right now?

ZEIFMAN: Well, I think that for any intellectually honest Democrat, her -- it would be a moral imperative to vote against her.

BOORTZ: Because of her lack of ethics when she was working for you?

ZEIFMAN: Well, no. Frankly, I had hoped when she eventually became first lady, I had hoped that we had taught her a lesson. And I had voted for Bill Clinton, knowing that he was advocating a two-for-one presidency. But after two -- [coughs] excuse me --

BOORTZ: That happens to me all the time, too. And I'm on the radio, so --

ZEIFMAN: [coughs] There I go again.

BOORTZ: Yeah.

ZEIFMAN: And I don't even smoke. Now, what happened was that I voted for Bill Clinton out of loyalty to the Democratic Party. And -- but within a short time, I became very disenchanted with the Clinton administration because of its corruption and deceit.

How she still has a political career and isn't serving time for her actions in Whitewater, I'll never know.  Seriously.  Do you Shrillary supporters really think she gives a hoot about you?  Really?

Are They Really This Stupid?

O.k, we all know Democrats don't know squat about history, but unless this is photo-shopped, there is no way on God's green Earth that they should be taken seriously about anything from here on in.



Democrat?  I mean, wow.  And apparently that's not all.  The Democrats (who may or may not be responsible for the above plaque-but don't you think someone would tell them?)  According to the donkey party, Ronald Reagan was a Congressman.
And yes, scroll down and I did copy the plaque pic from a reader.  This is too rich, man.

Breitbart Lives

On the second anniversary of the death of conservative activist, Andrew Breitbart, may I say his dream of taking it to the left is alive and well.

Media Once Again Misleads the Public

This time it's about the so-called "anti-gay" bill, SB 1062 in Arizona, vetoed by Governor Jan Brewer. Contrary to what the talking heads on the idiot box said, the bill was NOT an "anti-gay" bill.  It was about reinforcing religious freedom.  In fact, it was simply an extension of already existing religious freedom laws in Arizona.  Scoff if you wish.  It's a fact. You can interpret it any way you wish, it doesn't mean you're correct.  If the bill had been passed, it's true intent was to protect professionals and others from performing duties that may contradict their principles and/or yes, religious beliefs.  A good example of which would be the story of 12 nurses in New Jersey that found themselves in just that situation.

Some gay business owners had stated that they would refuse service to any Arizona politician or private citizen that supported the bill, or does not agree with the homosexual lifestyle due to....beliefs and lifestyle. Nah.  No hypocrisy there.  Of course the very same media who vilified the bill and those who supported it (again, what the media says was in the bill) cheered and applauded the shop-owners for their "strength and conviction."  Hypocrisy, thy name is media.

Let me quote President Obama when he says, "let me be clear,"  (of course you won't have to listen to anyone tomorrow morning trying to decipher what I "meant by that" after saying let me be clear like he does, but I digress)

Anyways, let me be clear when I say, I am not homophobic, I am totally indifferent to this.  I simply don't care.  What I do care about is the spreading of misinformation and the lame-stream media has done it again. Stop being activists.  Stop being Obama sycophants.  Stop giving us your opinion.  We don't care.  Tell us the facts (you know real ones) and let us decide.  Then, simply, SHUT THE F**K UP!!!!!
By the way, Joy Reid of MSNBC (and others who call themselves "opinion journalists") since you have already admitted to not caring about actual facts when you admitted to indeed being a "journalist" who thinks that means people want to hear your opinion instead of the facts of the day, get out of the business.  Your useless and you're a disgrace.

FIRST RULES OF JOURNALISM:

1) Do not make yourself a part of the story.
2) You have no opinion

Apparently Reid and those responsible for misleading the public trust in the main story above didn't and never do, get the memo.

Grand Theft Obama

What your president is made of...

Look Over There!

Just a little political humor to tell it like it is...

Palin was Right...Again

Let's see, death panels?  Check.  Blood libel?  Check.  Paul Revere?  IRS?  Check.  Obamacare?  Check. And guess what?  She's right again about her prediction involving Vladimir Putin and Ukraine.  Mock her.  Hate her.  As with most liberals, they do both simply out of hand.  I could just say they do it because she's smarter than them (which is true and they know it-another reason for their ridicule) but they do it because...well, their liberals and it's innate in them to hate anyone they disagree with.  That and they're totally ignorant of history, of course.

Just as a side note; Israel in "Palestine" is an occupation.  U.S. troops in Iraq is an invasion/occupation.  But Russian troops inside of the sovereign Ukraine, that's an "uncontested arrival?"  Anything to protect Obama from looking feckless I suppose.  The Ukrainians are certainly sure what to call it.  Warning.  There is that little "threat" by Obama towards Vladimir Putin that the media are describing as "a stern warning," so don't be drinking anything whilst reading it, lest you want said drink to come out of your nose.

By the way the steadfast president of the United States, according to the lapdog media, said if Putin doesn't re-call his troops from Ukraine, "there will be costs of any military intervention."  Oooh.  You know, like when he "warned" Syria's Bashar al-Assad about crossing a "red line."  A red line that Obama denied saying, then back-peddled to say it was the "world's red line."  To which no one took him seriously anyway, as usual.  Then he got punk'd by Putin.

Next round, before it even starts?  Palin.  Again.