MoveOn Pro A Embarrassment to Genuine Activists

So not only did MoveOn.org literally pay the "activist" that was "stepped on" at the recent Rand Paul rally (which she must have enjoyed, because she was smiling the whole time-mission accomplished I guess) but she has been doing this type of thing for awhile now.

Then of course, useless idiots like Kieth Olberloon (because really, what is this guy good for other to induce vomiting?) drools all over her, giving her a platform for her B.S. about how she is just a victim of the eeeviill Republican supporters. She even got her "attacker" to apologize.

A suspicious person wearing an obvious blond wig making two different advances toward Rand Paul (if it had been a Democrat and the situation reversed what would the Dem's supporters have done?) she gets taken down, seen, understandably, as a threat and the left makes a media circus out of it.

And predictably hardly any (like a five second mention on ABC) mention of Marsha Foster, a Rand supporter who was attacked by earlier in the day, stepping on her foot that had still had a cast on it from a recent operation. Foster's foot had been lacerated and her injury busted open. But, again, a fake activist and an employee of MoveOn

Of course, the left haven't had all that much to complain about the violence of the right in the last few years (well there was that one guy about 15 years ago named McVeigh, so I guess they need a fresh, "real" villain") I mean at least she wasn't beat up by SEIU thugs or had her fingers bitten off, eh lefties?
And still, no one from the left is denouncing this fraud and MoveOn for hiring her.

Bomb Materials From Yemen Found on Commercial Aircraft Bound for Chicago

President Obama today said that,"We will continue to pursue additional protective measures for as long as it takes to ensure the safety and security of our citizens," after explosive materials were found in cargo shipments in Dubai and England that were bound for Jewish places of worship in Chicago.

White House Seeks to Remove Obama?

I know liberalism is a mental disorder, but do they really think they can remove Obama for physical or mental deficiencies as it pertains to the 25th amendment of the Constitution?

The thinking, apparently, is to remove him before 2012.
"It is very doubtful at this time that he will last his first term," Edward Spannaus of Executive Intelligence Review said in an interview with Press TV on Wednesday. "There are people who are upset within the administration and the Democratic party who are seriously considering how to remove Obama from presidency," Spannaus added.

I doubt it. I doubt this whole story. But if anybody in the administration wants the president removed, it would have to be the Secretary of State, one would have to think.

But to say Obama is mentally deficient, I disagree. I believe he's a radical and a socialist/Marxist, but mental? I don't know about that one. Still, desperate situations call for desperate measures and the Democrats are certainly desperate.

Then again, remember, all this is from a Iranian news source.

Democrats Already Trying to Cheat Election?

Although it's still a week away, the Dems are already trying to pull a ACORN/Al Franken type of thievery in Nevada. Why not? It worked for them in Minnesota for the ultra-moonbat, Franken (and strangely enough not a peep from the press when ballots starting appearing, quite literally, out of Dems closets and car trunks. No court orders, no re-counts. And they have a problem with the 2000 Florida count? Really? Not surprising coming from the Party of Theft. First they'll steal your votes, then your money. Oh wait, they don't actually keep your money; they'll give it to people that voted for them and who don't do a thing to earn it or deserve it...


And they can't fathom why they're losing seats come next week.

Probably because they can't remember-in the words of one of their own...

Madcow On the Loose

What a pair of moonbats! Whatever your feelings on abortion are, any abortion, can you believe this explanation of why women have them? Because they "care about motherhood?" And Madcow doesn't even bat an eye. Unbelievable. They will truly say anything and think, in their lefty-totally insane, elitist views, you not only agree with their highly asinine theories, but that they're actually true!

The Tea Party and the 2010 Midterm Elections

Over at NewsBusters.org, correspondent Lachlan Markey says we should be weary of anything Kate Zernike reports or says about the Tea Party movement, since most of her recent critiques have been the typical left-wing demonization tactics, wrought with racism and unfair and untrue assumptions.

While that is true, in this press conference for foreign journalists, Zernike didn't use any vitriolic accusations or slander as most of the left-leaning MSM does today. That's not to say this speech absolves Zernike of any peddling of misinformation in the past, but from what I read, she seemed to be playing fair baseball on this one....for someone hired by the Obama administration.
Am I wrong?

Toronto 18 Leader Gets 16 Years

via the CBC.

Khadr Pleads Guilty

The Canadian citizen who was caught in Afghanistan as a 15-year old combatant against U.S. forces, Omar Khadr has pleaded guilty to to all five charges against him, including murder and supporting terrorism. This is part of an attempted plea deal to have the rest of his 16-year sentence served in Canada. As part of Canadian law, he will get credit for time served while incarcerated since his capture in 2002. Since he has served eight years already, that means should he serve the remainder of his time in Canada, he will only have to serve an additional eight years.

The Tea Party Started Brewing Under Bush

A pretty good and dare I say honest write up by Dr. Timothy Dalrymple from Patheos’ Evangelical Portal on how and why the Tea Party really came into being and why the Democrats/liberals have underestimated, maligned them and why the Republicans need to take their message to heart and not fall in with any fringe elements.

More Desperate Revionism from Matthews and Carter

As truly pathetic as this is, it's the one thing libs do that never gets boring. Idiotic? Yes. Annoying and predictable? Yes. But always entertaining.

Former Carter employee and proverbial revisionist (like all MSNBC hosts) Chris "Tingle" Matthews actually sat there and let ol' Smilin' Jimmy Carter lie to the American people (not that anyone was fooled by it-save for the 10 people actually watching this) when he actually said that the reason he was utterly destroyed (my words-but more closer to actuality) by Ronald Reagan in 1980 was because of the third party candidacy of John Anderson, the closet "rival" to Reagan other than Carter; who only received 6.61% of the popular vote with no electoral votes. Second to him was Edward Clark, who garnered 1.06 of the popular vote, also with no electoral votes. So yep, that's what brought down Carter, a third party siphoning off votes from him. Because it was so close if it wasn't for that third (and fourth) parties, Carter would have actually had a chance. Did you get that? It wasn't because of the crippled economy. It wasn't because of a gas shortage. It certainly wasn't Carter's enabling of radical Islam to take hold in Iran and put us in the pickle we are now with Islamic terrorism or his failure to secure the release of 444 hostages. Nope, it was because of a third party candidate.

"...because, for two-and-a-half years, Ted Kennedy had been running against me. And in the last minute, a third-party candidate came in and picked up a lot of the liberal Democratic votes.
And, as a matter of fact, Ronald Reagan only got less than 51 percent of the votes, but he won because of a third-party candidate."

Right. It wasn't the fact that Reagan got over half of the voting public to trust him with the presidency, it was because of a third party that Carter's pathetic administration came to an end.

Liberals. Is there anything they won't say?

Reid Lies about "Saving the World from Depression," Ed Schultz Lies About Reid Not Saying It

Once again, the arsonist-in-the-making, Sgt. Ed Schultz of MSNBC "fame," (I put in his place of employment since many of you-like the rest of the world-probably don't know who this guy is, thanks to his minuscule to no ratings...like his entire network) has put his colossal foot in his ample mouth while trying to defend the likely future ex-Senator Harry Reid. After Reid arrogantly and falsely claimed that "...but for me we'd be in a worldwide depression," Schultz has the gall to claim he didn't say just that and that internet bigwigs like Matt Drudge and Andrew Breitbart are not only liars for exposing Reid, but for exposing Schultz's amateur reporting, complete bias and interview style.

"Angle's buddies in the conservative media are also lying about my interview with Senator Reid. They love to take things out of context to make Reid look as bad as possible. Take a look at how Drudge, "The Drudge Report," cherry-picked the interview. It reads, "But for me, we'd be in a worldwide depression."
That was half the sentence, Drudge, you liar.
America`s other biggest online liar, Andrew Breitbart, posted the same headline with video clips that take Reid completely out of the context. But this is the reason why Harry Reid doesn`t do a lot of national interviews."

Actually the reason Reid doesn't do a lot national interviews is because he's an old coot who suffers from delusions of grandeur and would be called on his B.S...unless he's being interviewed by the likes of Schultz.

So, let's go to the video tape...





SCHULTZ: The state [Nevada] has dropped farther than any other state?

HARRY REID: Oh yes, because we were at the top and we`ve fallen very hard. So people have been hurting, and I understand that, and it doesn`t give them comfort or solace for me to tell them, you know, but for me we'd be in a worldwide depression. They want to know what I have done for them.

Schultz is so desperate to save the job of any Democrat, especially the majority leader out of Nevada, he will literally try and revise history, not only right in front of your eyes, but only four days after everyone saw and heard what Reid said. In complete context.
This man is truly pathetic. What's worse is that any Dem that allows him or herself to be interviewed by this guy is just sticking his or her head in the lion's mouth.

Old News That Was Never Admitted

Therefore, according to the left, it wasn't news. It's old news in the fact that what was found in Iraq weren't new WMDs, but WMDs were found nonetheless. Ones that the U.N. demanded destroyed by Saddam Hussein, but were not.
Every year, it seems, the old and tired lie of "Bush lied," is being exposed as the historical and political misrepresentation that it was from the start. Not that libs with an agenda would care to tell you.

Do ya think liberals will grow some, grow up and apologize for slandering President Bush?
Nah. Me neither.

Also, apparently the scumbag that founded Wikileaks inadvertently helped Bush's claim of Iran's role in the Iraq War.

Boy, things sure do seem to be falling apart for the whole, "Bush lied, people died"/"Blood for Oil" meme don't they?

Maddow Apologizes for Stockman Libelous

"Recently we have been covering on this show the tension between extremism and electoral politics, the role that politicians can play in mainstreaming even violently radical politics. In the course of that coverage I made a brief reference two nights ago to a former politician named Steve Stockman. Mr. Stockman was a very conservative Republican politician elected in 1994. That was the last time we had our first midterm elections after a new Democratic president was inaugurated.Now I mentioned Steve Stockman on Monday's show, but it's not the first time we have discussed him and his record on this program...
Back in 1995, on the morning of the Oklahoma City bombing, just after the explosion, a member of Congress named Steve Stockman, Republican of Texas, was sent a fax touting the bombing. He was sent that fax by somebody in the militia movement. Mr. Stockman later turned that fax over to the FBI. He was never implicated in any way in the bombing itself. But there is a reason that the militia movement trusted a member of Congress enough to go to him with that.Mr. Stockman had, for example, written an article in Guns & Ammo magazine proclaiming that what happened at Waco was a government conspiracy to 'prove the need for a ban on so-called assault weapons.' Mr. Stockman peddled conspiracies that he got from the militia movement about the government planning a takeover, the government planning attacks, paramilitary attacks on American citizens.

Back to last night's correction --
When I mentioned Steve Stockman again on this show on Monday night, I misstated the details of that true account that you just heard me give there back on the show in March. On Monday I said that Mr. Stockman's notice from the militia movement about the Oklahoma City bombing was advance notice. It wasn't in advance, it was right after the bombing, I apologize for the misstatement. It was an editing error and it was mine alone."

Ok. Good for her, but isn't there anyone on her staff that goes over her stuff for mistakes? Like a producer perhaps? Anyone? Anyone at all?

A Betrayal of Black Americans

That's exactly what today's NAACP has become. Great points made by Niger Innis.

A compendium of history concerning this little left-wing group. And with all left-wing groups that claim equality, it was founded by unsavory elements:

Jacob Schiff, the Rothschild's man in America, decided that the best way to create racial tension was to establish leadership among the blacks. In 1909, he laid out plans for the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP). It was the merging of the communist-controlled Niagara Movement, a group of blacks led by W.E.B. duBois, and a group of white social activists. In the beginning, the top leaders of the NAACP were a group of Jews appointed by Schiff. Their goal was to fight segregation and discrimination. They are now the largest black organization in the country, with well over 1500 chapters, and about a half-million members. Communist Party members were told to join the NAACP in order to infiltrate them.

The Communist Party platform stated: "The Negro race must understand that capitalism means racial oppression, and communism means social and racial equality." Manning Johnson, who held the highest position a black could have in the Communist Party, said in his 1958 book Color, Communism and Common Sense that he quit because he felt Russia was attempting to involve them in a bloody revolution where as many as five million blacks would die.

Another Negro Communist, Leonard Patterson, testified on November 18, 1950: "I left the Communist Party because I became convinced ... that the Communist Party was only interested in promoting among the Negro people a national liberational movement that would aid the Communist Party in its efforts to create a proletarian revolution in the United States that would overthrow the government by force and violence through bloody full-time revolution, and substitute it with a Soviet form of government with a dictatorship of the proletariat."

Betcha didn't know that, did ya?

Multiculturalism Has Failed

German Chancellor, Angela Merkel said it first. She apparently is the only one to have the guts to state the obvious (with anger and claims of bigotry, of course, she now has to deal with) of something that has been showing it's limitations and problems for years now, if not decades already.

Up in Canada, we've had to deal with the government (that's both the Conservative and especially the Liberal parties) bending over backwards to not only"help" immigrants assimilate into Canadian culture, but to help them not to. They are not only given government jobs on a whim, it seems, better than average apartments and tax incentives on homes. Add in the fact that they receive about $2000 when they set up shop here, but they receive more on their monthly government subsidy checks than the average citizen. About $700 more on average.

Nobody is saying they don't deserve a chance to succeed and make a better life for themselves and their families, but to be given government hand-outs while the rest of Canadians that have put into the economy via taxation are more than a little perturbed at this and rightfully so. It doesn't bode well when the rest of your populace has to scrimp and save and be overtaxed, when new Canadians are pretty much waited on hand and foot by the government. This is not bigotry, this is fact. Equality is not treating one segment of the population any better than the rest.

In 2006 Ontario premier, Dalton McGuinty (yes, that is real name) was an inch from giving Muslims in Ontario Sharia law, in which they would govern and supposedly police themselves, much like how natives/Aboriginals do. Not all, but many in Ontario and especially Quebec. If it wasn't for Muslim women crying foul due to their knowledge of how Sharia law treats women in Islam, it would be a reality today.

While it is a different story in the U.S, Thomas Sowell makes it clear that it's not all that together different.

Yes, we can all get along and prosper. We all deserve to have peacful, productive lives. All of us. But, there's more to it than beautiful dresses and exotic food.

Joy Behar Explained

Ah, now I get it. I was wondering how this "comedienne" had a career and a gig on the View, when nobody ever heard of her beforehand. I mean nobody could be this bat-sh*t crazy. It all makes sense now. Not how she got on national televison with her knowing absolutely nothing about history and the game of politics, but how she's such an Obama drone.

H/T to Moonbattery.com

HealthCare: Reagan v.s. Obama

Planetary Defense Coordination Office Proposed to Fight Asteroids

You mean they don't have this already?

Related...Astronomers say they've found oldest galaxy so far

Appeals Court Stays Ruling on Gays in Military

For now.

Iran, Venezuela Leaders Seek 'New World Order'

And...?

Bad News is No News

Back in 2006, when the Republicans were losing massive amounts of seats in both chambers of Congress due to the economy, the media's take on the war and how it could really help the Democrats seize power during a tumultuous time in America, the MSM was all over the TV and newspapers and at the heels of ant-war Dems to get any story to demonize the war, Bush and the GOP. Any story. Even ones that were fabrications from start to finish.

But since 2006, when the Democrats took over Congress with a large majority, thanks to the media's manipulation, misinformation and bias; the economy has nearly collapsed (much worse under Bush and the Republicans) and media has said not one negative word towards the Dems-in charge of everything (remember: THEY WON!) especially the war in Afghanistan.

However, as Victor Davis Hanson of Townhall points out, no such furor surrounds Afghanistan.
Why the silence? Could it possibly be because there's an election in two weeks? For months before the 2006 elections all we heard about were the deaths in "Bush's War."

As far as the media and the people in the White House, it apparently still is. Except that they'll credit Obama with any sort of "good news" and blame Bush who has been out of office for two years, with anything bad, and will continue to do so. Especially now since the Dems are in real trouble come Nov. 2.

So really, nothing new here.

Shots Fired at Pentagon

via CNN.com

Palin Recounts History Correctly, Libs Snobbishly and Incorrectly Mock Her

So what else is new? Just like how it doesn't matter what any Tea Party sign says, the establishment media will call it racist, just like how anything any conservative says, they're all inept and stupid. It doesn't matter if their facts (like names and dates-something totally foreign to libs) are wrong, in their tiny little elitist minds, they're right and everyone else is wrong. And I'm sure they'd love to tell you so.

I am of course referring to Sarah Palin's absolutely correct reference to the 1773 Boston Tea Party.

The Boston Tea Party was a direct action by colonists in Boston, a town in the British colony of Massachusetts, against the British government. On December 16, 1773, after officials in Boston refused to return three shiploads of taxed tea to Britain, a group of colonists boarded the ships and destroyed the tea by throwing it into Boston Harbor. The incident remains an iconic event of American history, and other political protests often refer to it.

The Tea Party was the culmination of a resistance movement throughout British America against the Tea Act, which had been passed by the British Parliament in 1773. Colonists objected to the Tea Act for a variety of reasons, especially because they believed that it violated their right to be taxed only by their own elected representatives. Protesters had successfully prevented the unloading of taxed tea in three other colonies, but in Boston, embattled Royal Governor Thomas Hutchinson refused to allow the tea to be returned to Britain. He apparently did not expect that the protesters would choose to destroy the tea rather than concede the authority of a legislature in which they were not directly represented.

The Boston Tea Party was a key event in the growth of the American Revolution. Parliament responded in 1774 with the Coercive Acts, which, among other provisions, closed Boston's commerce until the British East India Company had been repaid for the destroyed tea. Colonists in turn responded to the Coercive Acts with additional acts of protest, and by convening the First Continental Congress, which petitioned the British monarch for repeal of the acts and coordinated colonial resistance to them. The crisis escalated, and the American Revolutionary War began near Boston in 1775.

Yes,that tea party, the original one, that liberals apparently are having a ball making fun of her for. Them and all their little ignorant minions. And of course, no help from the MSM. Wait. Isn't Ifill part of the MSM? I think so. So there's your answer. If Gwen Ifill (the mediator of 2008's Vice-Presidential debate that had a financial interest in Obama becoming president) is this ignorant and childish, what are the odd her contemporaries will publicly correct her?

My God, liberals are dumb sheep. And through their collective laughing, it's pretty clear that they're ignorant about that too. Unbelievable that this has to be explained to them.

Sarah Palin, correct. Arrogant and ignorant liberals, just...brainless. See what I mean about their lack of knowledge concerning history? I guess they're so used to trying to re-write it.

Moe Tucker: Tea Party Patriot

When Moe Tucker (now Maureen Tucker) drummer of the famed 60's band, Velvet Underground voiced her opinion about the current administration, liberal heads were spinning as I'm sure they thought that Ms. Tucker being a child of the 60's would get lock-step in behind the Obama administration in fundamentally "changing" America; instead she has decided that she does have her own thoughts and opinions and does not share the liberal brain with all the rest.

See what happens when you get off the dope and grow up?

Christine O'Donnell: 'Separation of Church and State' Not in Constitution, MSNBC Shocked, Angered

Well she's right.

The Constitution says in the 14th Amendment, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." This simply means that you are free to practice any form of religion you wish with out the fear of government intervention. Something that really miffs the left. This is why many Democrats have said they "don't agree" with the Constitution or that "it's wrong."

The genesis of the phrase started in 1878 and then in 1947. It was never intended to take God out of the government of a Christian nation, despite what Barack Obama says.

"The term is an offshoot of the original phrase, "wall of separation between church and state," as written in Thomas Jefferson's letter to the Danbury Baptists Association in 1802. Jefferson was responding to a letter that the Association had written him. In that letter, they expressed their concerns about the Constitution not reaching the State level. The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution did not yet exist, thus leaving the States vulnerable to federal legislation. In Jefferson's letter, he was reassuring the Baptists of Danbury that their religious freedom would remain protected." -Wikipedia

Currency in the United States is printed by the federal government isn't it? What's that little phrase on it about in whom we trust? A phrase that the liberals in the U.S. are desperately trying to get rid of. Those poor lefty sensibilities y'know.

Rachel Maddow: 4/19 Truther?

We've all heard of 9/11 Truthers, right? And we all know of the Oklahoma City bombing perpetrated by domestic terrorist, Timothy McVeigh on April 19, 1995 (you know the one right-wing terrorist who is the only one that the left can bring up time and time again, even with the "plethora" of right-wing terrorists. Just once can they at least mention Ted Kazinsky...even though I believe he was a lefty; which is why he never gets mentioned...incessantly) well apparently Alex Jones, or the Loose Change idiots had a little brunch with the MSNBC host and got her to subject her tiny audience to fantasies and delusions of a "4/19." You know, another "what did they know and when did they know it," fiasco.

But The Mess's Madcow (and this is exactly why she has earned that name) sees no problem in asserting that a phantom "notice" was given to Texas Republican, Steve Stockman in the form of a fax that he apparently ignored which resulted in the deaths of 168 innocent men, women and children, was a forewarning to the bombing and that Stockman did nothing about it.

Once again the resident "intellectual" at MSNBC shows her vast ignorance and obvious contempt for anyone or anything Republican. And no one on her political side of the aisle, especially at MSNBC, will say a damn thing to correct her.

Will anyone at NBC or GE step up and stop this "woman" from just making stuff up? Disgusting.

Canadian Commander Pleads Guilty to Murders

"A commander who was a rising star in Canada's military pleaded guilty Monday to the murders of two women, the sexual assaults of two others and dozens of breaking and entering charges..."

Shame.

Lies About the Tea Party...A Brief History

A brief history on the left's mis-characterizations and lies about the Tea Party and it's movement.
Yeah, I know...from the New York Times???

Arriana Huffington So Desperate to Astroturf, She'll Pay Your Way

Huffington Post founder and editor, Arianna Huffington is so desperate to show up Glenn Beck, due to his ultra-successful rally, that she's willing to pay for the bus fare for liberal sheep to travel to New York to Washington.
I'll skip over the fact how Ed Schultz (you know he secretly wants this to fail so the turn out of his own failed rally won't give him any more facial breakouts) and even Nancy Pelosi complained (untruthfully, of course) how all the big turnouts at Tea Party rallies were astroturfers-totally and conveniently omitting how most the Democrat town hall meetings were filled with "bussed-in" union attendees. Once again, being a liberal means never having to say you're sorry, never having to tell the facts and most importantly to them, do as I say, not as I do.

Al Sharpton, Ed Schultz, Arianna Huffington. How many is there going to be until they finally (if at all) beat the numbers at Beck's rally? Is it a vendetta? Are they really that put off by Beck's rally success? Are they really that jealous? Don't they realize that 1) their attendance levels are the same as their television viewers and readership levels? Zero to none. Maybe, just maybe that's why their rally attendance numbers are so low. And 2) Do they not realize the people that went to Beck's rally are inspired by him? That they went of their own free will and by their own pocket books and time? That they weren't led there by a carrot on a stick that was uninformed information and all-out lies?

Nope. And they never will. I doubt it, but even if there is more people present at this little get-together, it's the message that made beck's successful, not the souls in attendance. Who knows, maybe Stewart can get a "sane" message across and make the left realize it isn't about left versus right or who can get more people to attend what rally. It's about fixing the way Americans go about having political discussions. Stewart himself has said it's about bi-partisanship. But the liberals will call it their own if it's successful.

And Ed Schultz will burn down some building.

Daily Kos Allows Paranoia In It's Ranks

And it's so matter-of-factly, too. You'd have to think so after reading this column by the out-of-his-head "diarist," screened-named, "Troubadour."

Mr./Mrs. "Troubadour" seems to think (like all out-of-their-heads Looney libs) that with the assumed near all-out victory bythe Republicans next month, the GOP are going to, get this kill liberals because even with a Congressional victory, the Republicans and Tea Party are going to get "more violent." Not as violent as SIEU thugs. Not as violent as lefty radio hosts Mike Malloy, Randi Rhodes or even Ed Schultz want their listeners to be. Nope. After their November elections, the GOP/Tea Party are going to be so elated, yet so unfulfilled that their going to take a play from the history of the left and create death squads to vanquish their enemies.

Me thinks mr./Mrs. Troubadour is a little coo-coo for Coco Puffs.
The violent and totalitarian right? Hmm. Let's see...

Human Events Reporter Assaulted

It's Official: MSNBC Creates Violent-Prone, Would-Be Killers

Another Obama Totalitarian Employee

Lefty Celebrity Calls for Tolerance, Non-Violence

Schultz Loses It

"Anti-Hate" Protesters Spit on Breitbart, Call Him Homosexual

It's Official: MSNBC Creates Violent-Prone, Would-Be Killers

Another Obama Totalitarian Employee

Socialist Party of America Lists 70 Congressional Democrats as Members

Extremism of the Democrats

Barbara Boxer-Baby Killer

Race As A Political Weapon

What the NAACP/Tea Party Battle Is Really About

For Liberals, An Accusation is Enough

First Lady Lies About Tea Party

Holder Accused of Dropping Black Panther Case Because of Race

More Violence from the Left

And that's just for starters. There's also the recent revelations of wrong-doing by Maxine Waters, Charlie Rangel, Barney Frank, etc. I can go on for days with links to Democrat and liberal malfeasence; in Congress, their unions, teachers and everybody else who thought that the election of Barack Hussein Obama would give them carte blanche over the will and interests of the people. Not to mention the law.

GOP death squads? Look to your own ideologies history for that one Mr. or Mrs. Troubadour.

As Far As Foreign Contributions Go...

Ahem.

Frank Continues with the Housing Lie

Like the author asks, doesn't this guy know about YouTube? Yeah, he does. But he also knows his enablers in the media will back him up every step of the way until the rapture.

H/T to Moonbattery.

When Will the Media Admit Their "Islamophobia?"

Whenever some left-wing media outlet pulls a cartoon or any sort of likeness from their syndicated comic strips or when any mention of the "Prophet of Islam" is mentioned on television, there is always the defense of "religious tolerance" or "understanding." Nevermind that these same outlets have absolutely no problem on symbolically defecating on Christian values and symbols, and then to have an iron-clad excuse as to why, but to then use the cover of "tolerance" to hide their own fears of Muslim retribution is simply hypocritical at best and cowardly at worst.

To that point, here is a "Hell, Yeah!" to FOX's Greg Gutfield for calling the lefty media on it. Of course, he works for FOX, so he's clearly a racist, bigoted, Islamophobic white supremacist.

"...why is it that the media keeps reminding us that we shouldn’t exaggerate the threat of a small group of radicals, but then completely changes tact when it comes to their own personal safety?
Think about it: if the average Joe expresses anxiety over Islamic fundamentalism, they’re called Islamophobes. But if an editor removes a comic in which Mohammed isn’t even present, that’s not honest to Allah Islamophobia?
Look, the media can’t have it both ways. They cannot criticize the public for concerns over Islam and then pull this stunt over a fear they may get stabbed in front of a Starbucks. If their governing principle in the newsroom is fear, then they should admit it and get the hell off our backs for feeling pretty much the same way."

Score one for Gutfield.

Don't Agree with Your Guests? Then Whine and Stomp Off the Set Like Pure Amateurs

Just like what The View hosts, Joy Behar and Whoopi Goldberg did when Bill O'Reilly disagreed with the ultra-left hens.
Did I mention approximately 60% of the America agrees with O'Reilly's opinion?



If that's all it takes to shut up Behar, more guests really need to do this. Nice show of professionalism by these two, huh?

Barbara Boxer Helped Code Pink Deliver Aid to Terrorists?

Via Moonbattery

Why isn't she being charged for treason? Her and her moonbat accomplices?

Obama Administration Appeals Gay Marriage Ruling

Now, this could be some wrangling by the administration to show that the president, who is a former Contitutional teacher, just to show that he does indeed protect the constitution as his oath as president instructs him to do. It could be argued that he does so only to warrant the liberal-Democrat agenda, but once again, givie credit where it's due. Although, it is up to the individual states isn't it?

Media See No Indictment of Web Journalism in ThinkProgress Smear

Surprise, surprise.

So when Andrew Breitbart put up a video of Shirley Sherrod puting her words out of context, the left-wing media was all up in arms about the dishonesty and lack of journalistic integrity (no one seemed to notice her husbands racist remarks just a few days later) and except for a handful on the left (astonishingly the New York Times among them) no one is apparently interested in seeking the truth to the false claims of ThinkProgress smearing the Chamber of Commerce (MSNBC's Chris Tingle is even going so far as to claim the CoC is purposefully sending American jobs overseas-which is pretty much the exact opposite of their given fuction-to, I guess, crumble the CoC from the inside) The CoC's goal is - and always has been - to assist American companies to grow their businesses. If they all contract to zero employees in the United States, the Chamber of Commerce would become extinct.

When the Sherrod case hit the airwaves, that's all that the MSM could bring themselves to talk about. How FOX News and Breitbart were solely responsible for the "outrage."
But now with the left going into overtime with unfounded accusations (with the CoC and either party not obligated to release the origins of their funding, as in this case) of the Chamber of Commerce giving donations to Republican campaigners from foreign sources, none of them seems all that interested in the truth. Once again, all the left is concerned about are accusations. No facts to back them up, but in the world of the lefty journalist, that doesn't matter-and it hasn't for decades, not since Watergate.

NewsBuster's Lachlan Markay has a terrific reminder of the left's hypocrisy and ongoing transparent agenda.

Really, how does the agenda of the lefty media not change after nearly 50 years without these people losing sleep at the smears and lies they've spread. Even when it's to champion one of their own?

OMG! Get A Load of This

Helen Thomas, the disgraced dinosaur of the liberal media and clearly biased and anti-Semite, claims she's not.

The lengths the left will go to re-write history (as clearly Thomas knows nothing of the matter, especially the history of "Palestine" and just how long Jews have been in the West Bank and any other place in the "disputed" territory. In case your wondering, the Jews have been in the land that is now Israel, the West Bank, Golan Heights and the Sinai since before the Bible was written, whereas the Arab community that now fancies themselves "Palestinians" descended from Syria, Jordan and what is now Lebanon. They are simply not native to the area. The area now designated by the name of Palestine was not a country and had no frontiers, only administrative boundaries. It was only named as such by the Romans for provincial and taxation reasons.

So, this attempt by the Anti-American left, and their complete compliance with the "Hezbollah point of view" is not only revisionism, but is arguably dementia. You did see the quote, "[The] "Palestinians are not armed, and they’re helpless," Then how are Israeli's being shot and rockets launched at them almost daily?

This folks, is the mindset of a left-wing loon. Not only imaginative, but completely willfully ignorant, untruthful and totally off the reserve.

Although certainly not "proof" of this, here are certain "professional and historical opinions" on the myth of "Palestine." Also, check out this and this. They are prior posts on the matter.
I emplore everyone reading this to truly research this abomination of history.

Moreover, you may want to checkout the web sites Honest Reporting and Palestine Media Watch to see what the Arab and anti-American and Anti-Semite "news" agencies are trying to get you to believe.

Bozell Column: Obama Now Bashing Foreigners, Reeks of Desperation

Truly, the Hypocrite-in-Chief. No convictions, no plans, no honor.

Human Events Reporter Assaulted

Apparently MSNBC's Ed Schultz forgot to tell his incredibly shrinking audience about how a petite, caucasian Human Events reporter, Emily Miller was accosted by a black, bigoted liberal woman at Schultzy's "One Nation" rally. Of course (and this is getting really nauseating) once again, not a peep from the MSM.



"The reporter, Emily Miller, who was videotaping Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-N.Y.) was first hit from behind while she was taping Rangel in front of the Lincoln Memorial. Miss Miller is heard on the video saying, 'Please don't hit me.' The protester proceeds to yell at the reporter, 'Well get out of the way! What do you think this is? A--hole.' The activist was attempting to meet Rangel herself. Miss Miller continued videotaping the event, when suddenly the same unhinged protester lunged at her, hit her on the arm, and yelled, 'Don't take my picture.'"

As Van Helsing over at Moonbatery.com says, "Imagine the deafening shrieks from the media if a black reporter showed up at a Tea Party and was assailed by a Caucasian Amazon?"

Where's the outrage from the left? Where's the accusations of bigotry from the "One Nation" crowd? Where's the dicussions of "One Nation" anger and resentment. Where's the accusations of far-left fringes and "ugliness?"

Isn't it funny that there is absolutely no evidence of Tea Party bigotry and hatred, but almost every moment of left-wing hatred and intolerence is captured on video almost every time and the left-wing media still deny it, lie about it and continually try to spin it?

I Want Your Money

I Want Your Money is opening all over the place (although apparently not in moonbat-dominated NYC, LA, or Chicago) on October 15, perfectly timed to set us in the right frame of mind to begin turning back socialism on November 2.
H/T to Moonbattery.

Democrats Still Harp on Unsubstantiated Allegations of Commerce

So the Democrats and their great leader are so desperate about losing seats in Congress that they've resorted to unsubstaniated claims of the Republican party recieving campaign contributions "funneled" through foreign money.

Nevermind that the Dems more than the Republicans do in that area, but it's typically not true anyway.

Of course the liberal pundits that are as desperate as the Dems themselves are typically trying to spin this as true in all of their collective ignorance and bias.

Only the Dems and their usual minions are claiming this to be true. However, one of their usual allies, the New York Times has even debunked this. As have others, surprisingly, including NBC. I mean, like wow!

Charles Krauthammer exposes them for what they are...reptilian.

Everything new is old again.

Red Herring Politics

I just couldn't resist posting this column from the always brilliant Thomas Sowell. He's sure got the Democrats pegged.

Obama Administration Blocked Oil Spill Estimate

The Obama administration blocked efforts by government scientists to tell the public just how bad the Gulf oil spill could become and committed other missteps that raised questions about its competence and candor during the crisis, according to a commission appointed by the president to investigate the disaster.

Hmm. Transparency.

DoD Cover Up of "Able Danger?"

Oh, the Truthers are going to have a field day with this one. Maybe those Loose Change conspiracists will make volume four or something. You know, now they have conclusive "proof."

But it looks like someone was attempting to cover up the investigative findings that 9/11 hijacker, Mohammed Atta was known to U.S. and other intelligence officials at least a year before he and 18 other Muslim extremists flew commercial aircraft into the World Trade Center and Pentagon and of course the failed mission of flight 93 that crashed in a field in Pennsylvania.

The operation or investigation was known as "Able Danger," and it was all the rage in the blogosphere in 2005.

Now, Fox News exclusively reports that the DoD materially altered witness testimony in its investigation.

A document obtained and witnesses interviewed by Fox News raise new questions over whether there was an effort by the Defense Department to cover up a pre-9/11 military intelligence program known as “Able Danger.”

At least five witnesses questioned by the Defense Department’s Inspector General told Fox News that their statements were distorted by investigators in the final IG’s report — or it left out key information, backing up assertions that lead hijacker Mohammed Atta was identified a year before 9/11. …

Fox News, as part of an ongoing investigation, exclusively obtained a clean copy of the report and spoke to several principal witnesses, including an intelligence and data collector who asked that she not be named.

The witness told Fox News she was interviewed twice by a Defense Department investigator. She said she told the investigator that it was highly likely a department database included the picture of Atta, whom she knew under an alias, Mohammed el-Sayed.
“When it came to the picture, (the investigator) he was fairly hostile,” the witness told Fox News. She said it seemed the investigator just didn’t want to hear it. “Meaning that he’d ask the same question over and over again, and, you know, you get to the point you go, well, you know… it’s the same question, it’s the same answer.”

Times Square Bomber Gets Life

Failed Times Square bomber, Faisal Shahzad; the smirking, defiant Pakistani-born U.S. citizen who tried to set off a car bomb in New York's busy Times Square was sentenced on Tuesday to life in prison after he defiantly said more attacks on America were imminent.

Telling

HA! Is this a major foreshadow or what?

Obama-Clinton Ticket "On the Table" for 2012?

Will President Barack Obama dump Joe Biden as Vice-President for current Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton? Political author and columnist, Bob Woodward seems to think so.

This will cause waves and really could secure a second term for Obama. It will be even more of a apparent cinch when the media starts having on-air orgasms about it. It looks that way, because as of right now, who do the Republicans have that could be seen as a lock?

If the media does it's job about truth pertaining to both of these two's failed record, policies and associates, then it shouldn't take much by the Republicans, if they don't screw it up. Just give the Dems enough rope.

Hip Hop Curriculum Teaches Kids to Hate Great American Presidents

Here is the media-friendly, watered down propaganda. Here is a more transparent look at the curriculum.

Anything to warp minds and get votes from future America-haters. Brilliant!

Dutch Politician Wilders on Trial for Hate Speech

Or is it free speech? Do not DARE question Islam or it's agenda!

Wait...Muslims Discovered America?

That's apparently what some new textbooks say. Isn't this what the Christian historians in Texas wanted t avoid in the first place? A total revision of history?

It's Offical, Obama IS Jimmy Carter All Over Again.

Right down to the solar panels and everything!

Let's see..

Helped to further radical Islam's agenda of a global caliphate? Check.
Wrecked the economy beyond comprehension? Check.
Getting more unpopular by the day? Check.
Green freak? Oh...check!

I don't know. Does the guy like peanuts?

Palin Running?

I hate to publish unconfirmed reports and/or rumor, but this, a reportedly leaked e-mail between Todd Palin, Joe Miller, Palin’s lawyer, and SarahPAC’s treasurer has to make the left's heads collectively spin. I bet half of them are (nervously) laughing, thinking, "Please run! She'll be such a pushover! She's so stupid!," and all that. Be careful what you wish for libs.

Then again...

"I read the emails and it sounds like to me that she’s still leaving the door open. If she decides to run, she and Todd expect Miller to support her. Where’s the revelation?"
-commentor, NoNails

Karzai and Taliban Negotiating?

Is Afghani President, Hamid Karzai secretly negotiating an end to the Afhganistan War with the Taliban?

CBS Seeks Advice for Obama From Another Failed Democrat

First the worst president in history, Jimmy Carter is brought onto the airwaves to pathetically revise the history of his failed one-term administration, then to further show the delusions of CBS, they bring on Walter Mondale. The man that was thoroughly crushed by Ronald Reagan in the 1980 presidential elections by losing 49 of 50 states to the California governor.

Is this what passes for intimate, intellectual opinions, failed presidents and nominees? Who's next, Michael Dukakis? I guess they have to do anything to help make Obama look at least nominally competent. How could one not, compared to these two?

As Expected, Schultz Openly Lies About "One Nation" Rally Numbers

Just like I said he would (and I'm sure I'm not the only one) Ed "Burn This Place to the Ground" Schultz pathetically lied about the crowd size of his "One Nation" rally compared to that of Glenn Beck's "Restoring Honor" rally a few weeks ago.

So (and no, these are not photoshopped) let's compare aerial pictures of both events:

First Schultzy's



And then, Beck's

So really? Is he freakin' kidding? Who is he trying to kid? I know his liberal media buddies will totally go with him on this, as Times Watch points out, but seriously, what is he crushing up and smoking?
This is how the liberal mind works, folks. Plain and simple.

Media Looks for Signs at Tea Party Rallies, Ignores Anti-Obama Signs at "One Nation"

And the beat goes on. The MSM will go out of it's way to show fake racism signs and posters brought by union infiltrators and Democrat "operatives" at Tea Party rallies, going so far as to argue with citizens, but will use the same gumption to purposely avoid any signs against the policies of President Barack Obama and the Democrat-controlled Congress shown on the air, or signs that promote socialism.

"...signs that were featured during reporter Tahman Bradley's segment: ""Peace, justice, equality, hope, change," "Fair trade, not free trade," "Educate every child," "Full and fair employment" and "Silence GOP lies." However, signs with the Communist Party USA logo, posters reading "Capitalism is failing, socialism is the alternative" and "Build a socialist alternative" were not."
"Individuals with books such as the Communist Manifesto and The Jewish Question were also avoided."

Also no mention of Beck's rally simply destroying Sgt. Schultz's by the obvious sheer numbers. Also nothing about the mess left behind, from the supposedly "green" left members of the political spectrum.

Because we can't let it be known that people with pro-socialist literature and signs are part of the left's plan to "change" America. But fake signs, representatives, reporters personal, biased opinions and manipulating video is apparently in the media's rally-coverage handbook.

CNN Axes Sanchez

Not that it wasn't a good idea in general, but Rick Sanchez's looney ideals finally got him into hot water he couldn't talk his way out of. It's about time the powers-that-be at CNN recognized his anti-Semetic behavior. Not that he hid it well anyways. Hmm, Jimmy Carter, Helen Thomas and Rick Sanchez, what's that about the right being bigoted?

Let's see, if the honchos over at GE can finally open their eyes about the destructive bile that pours out of the mouths of Kieth Olbermann, Ed Schultz and Larry O'Donnell, maybe they'll have a chance of lifting their dismal ratings up...maybe. Then again, maybe MSNBC is just a horrible cable outlet.

Bin Laden Criticises Pakistan Relief Mission

So, the guy that values death over life (or so he tells the fools that die for him) and thinks even newborns are no more innocent than full-grown adults whom he considers 'infidels' and "kafirs," is suddenly worried about flood relief in Pakistan and, of all things, global warming!

How do you like that you looney enviornmentals, you have the same mission as the world's worst terrorist?

Ahmadinejad Calls for US Leaders to be 'Buried'

Iran's president Sunday called for U.S. leaders to be "buried" in response to what he says are American threats of military attack against Tehran's nuclear program.

Something has got to be done about this lunatic.

Alan Grayson v/s The Truth

By now we've all seen and heard Democrat Rep. Alan Grayson's morally reprehensible attack ads on Republican Rep. Daniel Webster. Of course the MSM knows all of Grayson's lies are just that, but per usual, they go on without correcting the record in hopes that Grayson will hold on to his seat and that if the non-answer by the elite media helps Grayson here, it will help other Dems elsewhere.

Here, Grayson's obvious and dispicable lies are countered with the actual facts concerning Webster.

Hopefully the truth shall set Grayson free...from his job.

Reducing Our Carbon Footprint...The Final Solution

Well, if you can't manipulate and scare people into reducuing the hoax that is man-made global warming (including making them so scared of the future of the Earth and it's inhabitants that some even kill their families and themselves-talk about playing on our fears, eh Al?) then simply do away with the producers of those footprint...and get 'em while they're young:

Ed Schultz Rally...FAIL!!

Not that everybody didn't totally expect this, but remember when MSNBC's Sgt. "Burn this place to the ground" Schultz guarenteed he could gather more people than Glenn Beck's "Restoring Honor" rally? He claimed he could "do that?" That he could "easily" gather at least the same as Beck did. Or that he could get "Leo Gerard, I could get the Service Employees International Union, I could get AFSCME, I could get all these--I guarantee you, I could do more than 300,000! It ain't a big deal!"

Well, now that Schultzy had his little rally, how will he spin this so that he is free to come up with any little excuse as to why his rally was the collasul failure that it was. As I said, totally expected.
Did he really think he was going top Beck? And how much will he lie about it?

Of course, the liberal media is already spinning on Schultz's behalf by (predictably) downplaying Beck's numbers and enbellishing the Sarge's. But at the same time, other lefty journolistas are making lame excuses.

Again. Predictably pathetic.