A True Patriot

Talk about a love of country and the troops that serve her.

Via FOX News:

Letters From Home

By Laura Ingle

May 16, 2010

Doris Ventres is considered a real American Hero by many people in her hometown of Ridgefield Connecticut, and it's easy to see why.
"Mrs. V" as shes known, has been hand writing letters to U.S. soldiers from Ridgefield serving overseas for 42 years. This 82-year old 8th generation Ridgefielder was inspired to start her letter writing campaign one day while walking out of her local church. She explains, "I saw this nice plaque, a beautiful bronze plaque, in memory of two of the boys that had been killed at war. In fact, I went to school with one of them - and I thought - you know, why can't we do something about it before they are gone?"
That's when she got the idea to send hand written notes, detailing all the "goings on" at home, so that the troops from Ridgefield would feel included in the town's activities. Church plays, the changing of the colors of trees, even what the local fishermen were catching, no one has missed a thing thanks to Mrs. V.
Doris knows first hand just how much a letter from home can mean to someone serving overseas. Her husband George was in the Navy, as well as her father-in-law. Doris and George have been married for 62 years, and still live in the home that they built with their own hands. (George says Doris was even up on the roof pounding nails with a hammer and did a great job!) They have two sons, Tad and Dale, and have two grandchildren.
The couple that met at a square dance, and went fishing on their second date, have a lifelong commitment to their family and community that has given back to them many times over. Earlier this year, one veteran who spent two tours of duty in Iraq with the U.S. Air Force organized a special surprise event for Mrs. V to honor her hard work. One retired Army major who remembers a letter Doris wrote him while serving in Kuwait in 1991 told the crowd "The letters we got from her were a lifeline back to the world we came from.. They were like a cool drink of water."
Many troops are so happy to hear from her, they not only write her back from the field, but stay in touch with her after they are discharged.
Troops write her back It's something that keeps her smiling from ear to ear. Doris has an entire room in her house dedicated to her letter writing, and keeps every memento, letter, and flag she has received over the years. She calls it her "Memory Room"
It was an incredible honor to meet Doris and George and spend time learning more about their lives and the amazing work they have done through the years to support our troops. Doris tells me that she hopes her story will inspire others to pick up a pen and paper and write to our men and women serving overseas. There is a website I found while blogging about another patriotic woman (see link below) called http://www.anysoldier.com/ which is a good place to start if you are interested. With Memorial Day coming up... it seems like a good time to dust off that stack of stationary sitting in the office!

Precedent in Immigration Status

Legal authority of police concerning aquiring immigration status and detainment.
Granted this is a search and seizure case, but it illustrates the rights and cause of the police while dealing with suspected illegal immigrants.
And local law enforcement can enforce federal law.

Will the MSM Notice?

Nazi comparisons, swastikas, hatred and ignorance. All of which were at a pro-illegal rally Saturday (throughly and favorably covered by the liberal press, of course) So of course they noticed. Will they care? Of course not. We all know about their exuberance in relating any racist signs and slogans during Tea Party rallies (as little as their were, that either embellished or made up out of whole cloth) So why do I even bother repeating to ask if they'll change their hypercritical ways? But I will. It's hard not, to given their obvious and insulting agenda.

UPDATE: Yep. They noticed. The object the of their championing, that is.

Barney Frank Wants to See Rep. Djou's Birth Certificate

This ultimately proves how inept and incompetent elected Democrat officials are in Washington!

"But, unlike the commander-in-chief...being born outside the U.S. does not preclude you from becoming a member of Congress. "

Bananas!

I just have one thing to say..


Peanut butter-jelly time!

President to Hold Rare Press Conference

I mean rare. Like over 300 days rare.

I wonder how he'll answer questions with non-answers this time? It's not like he can know all the questions in advance so he can have the teleprompter at the ready. He can't put a plant in the press corps. He can't kick them out of the room because he doesn't like the question. It's been so long since his last press conference (in fact it's been so long, I don't even know if he's actually had any)

Maybe he'll just have this one so he can go another year. Wouldn't it be just grest if he was caught on a hot mic after it was over saying, "That oughtta shut'em up for a while?"

Maher Wants a Real Black President

Bill Maher did it again. Using his protection as a leftist-"media" celebrity blowhard to show his true racist colors. Only a true liberal can get away with something like this without a peep out of the media. Obviously Maher thinks all black are criminals who all carry guns and are all gang members. Truly revealing this. But of course it was only "a joke," so nothing to see here.
Hm. What are the odds Kieth Olberloon or Rachel Maddow, or even...well again, everyone (or is that anyone) at the all-white MSNBC will say anything about this? Did I say MSNBC? How about any liberal media member?

UPDATE: It's been a few days now and as I predicted (but not the least bit surprised by) no left-wing media outlets or bloggers have called out Maher for his blatantly racist comments. So, here's a column by Big Hollywood's Brad Schaeffer that parallels my sentiments and exposes Maher for the liberal elitist and racist that he is.

Pelosi Blames Bush for BP Oil Spill

Well, of course she did. Who else is to blame for all the Dems, nay, the world's ills? That evil, eeeeviiil, George W. Bush, that's who. I mean what else is new? Pelosi seems to play it as her ace-in-the-hole, because she thinks every living sole is a complete and utter moron and will jump up in unison and scream, "Yeah! It is his fault! Right on, sister!"
Only, I didn't hear of any bills on regulation or how BP (or any other Exxon "wannabes") would cause future catastrophes by the Great Speaker, the magnificent seer of our time that she clearly is.

Is anyone else, besides the local residents of MSNBC and the White House that is, growing really tired of the finger-pointing at the guy who's been out of office for nearly a year and a half?

The Thin-Skinned President

Absolutely. A good, if not totally revealing piece from Peter Wehner from Politics Daily.
And in case you missed it within the arcticle..."The President's Self-Pity."

Oklahoma and Other States to Hold Obamacare Opt-Out Referendum Votes in November

Rush Limbaugh broke the news to his listeners on Friday. NewsBusters also has the story.

How Do You Spell Dillusional?

T-a-v-i-s-S-m-i-l-e-y. What a fool and obviously a terrorist sympathizer and enabler.
Hmm. I wonder if the Fascist Doctrine will knock complete idiots like him off of the air? Seriously, how do these people garner enough brain power to form a thought? I think the term, in Smiley's case at least, would be idiot savant.

Good for Him

Elton John held a concert in Morocco before 40, 000 fans and bravely defied the hard-line Islamists that called for a ban on his performance. I say John was brave because we all know what hard-line Islam does with homosexuals.
John has always been outspoken and defiant of critics or naysayers and has never, as far as I know, let anyone tell him who he can be or who and where he chooses to perform. If only everyone would stand up and be true to their beliefs against the extremists, no matter what their religious beliefs or sexual orientation.

Kudos to the event's organizers for ignoring the Islamist Justice and Development Party that tried to keep John from performing.

The Ignoramus in Chief

You know that whole Anti-Christ-Obama-Massad thing? I made light of it before as a joke, well...



Why do the Obamaphiles keep following everything this ignoramus says? How can one who his followers think is so smart an cool, be so ignorant of history? I do believe it was the Persians, who taught the people of the world (the known population of the time) about medicine, literature, cleanliness and art. They gave us utensils, the alphabet and other key elements of culture that stand today, centuries before the religion of Islam ever appeared on the planet. Ignorance is bliss, except when you're the President of the United States nowadays.

I can't believe people buy into this. A fake is a fake. See what happens when people are too afraid to be called a racist, instead of standing up and correcting this tool?

But remember, he's one of them. His words.

Are You Kidding Me?!

Well America, you can feel safe and secure now. Your so-called leader (you know the guy that swore to protect the nation from all enemies foreign and domestic?) has just appointed two devout Muslims to guard your country from the enemy they have a kinship with. One of them, Shora, is a native of Damascus, Syria.

Is Barry the least bit concerned about giving actual Americans jobs to protect the nation? Like these guys are going to do anything that goes against the Koran or fellow Muslims?

Let's see devout Muslims that flew planes into the World Trade Center towers nine years ago. Check. A devout Muslim that killed 13 soldiers at Ft. Hood. Check.
Gee, I don't see a problem with this.

Statement by Secretary Napolitano:
“Today, I am proud to make two key personnel announcements for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS)—President Obama’s intent to nominate David Heyman as Assistant Secretary for Policy and my appointment of Arif Alikhan as Assistant Secretary for Policy Development. Both individuals bring a broad and impressive array of experience in national security, emergency preparedness and counter-terrorism to the Department."

Does this fool even know what an oath is? Or is it just that he swore an oath on the wrong religious text? I mean really, did anybody really check to see what pages were actually between the covers of that Bible he took his oath of office on?

Even if these guys don't turn out to be more Ft. Hood shooters in sheep's clothing, why take the chance? It's not like these types wouldn't infiltrate the government under the guise of patriots only to strike when the time is right. Or at the very least gather intel. Go ahead, call me paranoid, a racist (I know that one's coming) an Islamophobe, whatever; what can I call you if something should happen?

Where is McCarthy when you need him? He may have had some motives you can question about the communists in highest levels of the American government, but you know what? He was right.

Why No More National News Coverage for Southern Flood?

Considering I'm just as guilty as those "big-time" reporters that rushed to chastise President George W. Bush after the Hurricane Katrina who now are seemingly ignorant to the massive flooding in the southern states of Kentucky, Mississippi and Tennessee; as I to haven't mentioned it, I probably have no right to condemn any level of government's reaction to it or those members of the MSM that wanted so much for Katrina to be Bush's fatal albatross.

But when I read Larry Elder's take on this (especially when he reminded me of how much a total punk Kanye West is) I thought I should at least do the better late than never thing and post something about it, even if it is just a rant, more or less by someone else with more info than I. Shame on me.

Student Suspended for Bringing Rosary Beads to School

In these times of *ahem* religious freedom and so-called tolerance (of any and all religions except Christianity) it seems anyone of "foreign" religious beliefs are treated with the utmost respect and decency-even honored by some left-wing institutions. Up here in Canada, observers of Sikhism are allowed to carry a Kirpan, a sword or dagger meant to "be used to prevent violence from being done to a defenseless person when all other means to do so have failed," that must be worn by all followers of the faith that have reached the age of majority adhered by the faith. It is against the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms to disallow followers of Sikhism to carry it.

Of course, much has been made of Muslim women wearing the burka lately, especially in Great Britain, but again it is a part of the strict adherence of the Islamic faith for Muslim women to wear them and in accordance with the U.S. Constitution, they cannot be asked or told to not to adorn them.

So why would a high school student be suspended for wearing a symbol of his Christian faith? Simple. Christianity is a dirty word these days and any excuse to disallow followers to express any devotion to it is not only tolerated, but seemingly the rule in today's world. That world now includes a 70% plus Christian America. Even Atheists (with the exception of the ignorant and intolerant Bill Maher's and others who would like to do away with the Ten Commandments in public places-even though a heavy majority of Americans say they are not to be touched-and "In God We Trust" on currency, or crosses honoring fallen servicemen and women) are, oddly enough, seemingly more tolerant of any and all religions than academic institutions these days.

I guess it's just a matter of time before Christians are thrown to the lions once more.

MSNBC Host Challenges Misqote by NYT on Rand Paul Quote

As much as it gives me the heebie-jeebies to say so, I have to give props to MSNBC's Rachel Maddow Show for calling out the New York Times for misquoting (deliberately so, it seems) congressional candidate, Rand Paul.
Oh, but wait. It wasn't actually Rachel Maddow, it was guest-host, Chris Hayes.

It would never get that sane over at The Mess.

Rand Paul Gets What Liberal Pundits Are Up To

Although I'm torn most times on the policy stances of his father, Texas Congressman Ron Paul, who although at most times is a constitutionalist, at others an apparent loon (he's proven to be a 9/11 Truther and apparently doesn't know his history of Saddam Hussein's no-fly zone infractions) Rand Paul has certainly put left-wing pundits in their place and has shown of late that he knows their collective agenda.

I don't know if I'm going to like or even midly agree or disagree with his views on certain social mattters, or if he'll turn into a part-time loon as his father has, but boy, can this guy handle the left-wing media.

CA Congressman Blasts Calderon's AZ Comments and Dems for Applauding

Finally, someone stood up for the pro-illegal immigrant Dems and their buddy south of the border other than Congressman Steve King (R-IA)



And no, it isn't Castro or Chavez this time- for "disagree[ing] with the recently adopted law in Arizona." The most prominent of those offenders were the usual suspects; Eric Holder (the guy that's "too busy" to read a 10-page bill) Nancy Pelosi and Janet Napolitano (the one person in the Obama administration who should be all for protecting the borders, go figure)



A solid hip-hip-hooray for Rep. Tom McClintock (R-Calif.)

Oh, and in case you didn't know (and I suspect most of you don't since most of today's media wouldn't dare inform you on something that would go against their pro-illegal, bleeding heart narrative) Mexico's immigration laws are a heck of a lot more strict (if I were a liberal, I would even say racist) than America's.

*Foreigners are admitted into Mexico "according to their possibilities of contributing to national progress." (Article 32)

*Immigration officials must "ensure" that "immigrants will be useful elements for the country and that they have the necessary funds for their sustenance" and for their dependents. (Article 34)

*Foreigners may be barred from the country if their presence upsets "the equilibrium of the national demographics," when foreigners are deemed detrimental to "economic or national interests," when they do not behave like good citizens in their own country, when they have broken Mexican laws, and when "they are not found to be physically or mentally healthy." (Article 37)

*The Secretary of Governance may "suspend or prohibit the admission of foreigners when he determines it to be in the national interest." (Article 38)
Mexican authorities must keep track of every single person in the country:
Federal, local and municipal police must cooperate with federal immigration authorities upon request, i.e., to assist in the arrests of illegal immigrants. (Article 73)


*A National Population Registry keeps track of "every single individual who comprises the population of the country," and verifies each individual's identity. (Articles 85 and 86)

*A national Catalog of Foreigners tracks foreign tourists and immigrants (Article 87), and assigns each individual with a unique tracking number (Article 91).

*Foreigners with fake papers, or who enter the country under false pretenses, may be imprisoned:

*Foreigners with fake immigration papers may be fined or imprisoned. (Article 116)

*Foreigners who sign government documents "with a signature that is false or different from that which he normally uses" are subject to fine and imprisonment. (Article 116)

*Foreigners who fail to obey the rules will be fined, deported, and/or imprisoned as felons:

*Foreigners who fail to obey a deportation order are to be punished. (Article 117)

*Foreigners who are deported from Mexico and attempt to re-enter the country without authorization can be imprisoned for up to 10 years. (Article 118)

*Foreigners who violate the terms of their visa may be sentenced to up to six years in prison (Articles 119, 120 and 121).

*Foreigners who misrepresent the terms of their visa while in Mexico -- such as working with out a permit -- can also be imprisoned.


*Under Mexican law, illegal immigration is a felony. The General Law on Population says,
"A penalty of up to two years in prison and a fine of three hundred to five thousand pesos will be imposed on the foreigner who enters the country illegally." (Article 123)

*Foreigners with legal immigration problems may be deported from Mexico instead of being imprisoned. (Article 125)

*Foreigners who "attempt against national sovereignty or security" will be deported. (Article 126)

*Mexicans who help illegal aliens enter the country are themselves considered criminals under the law:

*A Mexican who marries a foreigner with the sole objective of helping the foreigner live in the country is subject to up to five years in prison. (Article 127)
Shipping and airline companies that bring undocumented foreigners into Mexico will be fined. (Article 132)

Informative, isn't it?

Also, believe it or not, CNN's Wolf Blitzer turned into a journalist and actually got Calderon to admit his hypocrisy and blatant interference in America's immigration policy (he then came to his senses and remembered what network he worked for)



BLITZER: So in other words, if somebody sneaks in from Nicaragua or some other country in Central America, through the southern border of Mexico, they wind up in Mexico, they can go get a job?-

CALDERON No, no.

BLITZER: They can work?

CALDERON: If -- if somebody do that without permission, we send back -- we send back them.

I'll ask one more time. When will the liberals of America stop hurting their own country, democracy and stop happily and willfully being on the wrong side of history every single time by trying to smash into oblivion that shining beacon on the hill?

David Horowitz: How Radical Professors Indoctrinate Students

I hope you have about an hour to kill. It's worth it.

















Plus have you seen this recently?



This is what is in America's universities. Oh, they're in Canada's too.

Surprise!

Damn HTML. I can't seem to embed this thing. Ah well, I'll just link it.
These are awesome! If you don't tear up at least a little bit, you're not human.
I like the very first one best.

Uh Oh!

This can't be good.

Remember This?

I do. I was only six when this was published, yet it continued well into the early 8o's. That is until the mighty Goracle needed a cash-cow. I even saw a reference to it recently on a re-run of Three's Company. The same ferver, paranoia and fear mongering was used back then when it came out. Why the change of opinion and/or "facts" for something that was "indisputable" back then? Simple. Greed, government funding ands lies. Have these clowns ever heard of the term "cyclical?"

What happens when the tide turns and another cooling trend starts? The same as it did back then. No apolgy from the "experts" and absolutely no admission of any misleading information.
Oh I know, "We didn't know as much then as we know now. Technology is much more advanced." Well, so are con-men like Al Gore. Not in the intelligent sense, just manipulative.

Did you notice the top of the cover where it says, "Why We Can't Beat the Soviets?" Are these clowns right on anything?

And as I sometimes do, I'd like to re-print a comment from a reader of Gateway Pundit:

AGW — as it is pushed and narrated by those with a political agenda — is, for all intents and purposes, a fraud. It isn’t about science. AGW activists have hijacked environmentalism for their own ends.
A few weeks before Climategate, a group of scientists who believe in AGW, or at least “GW,” warned the more ardent, alarmist and strident AGW believers to stop citing regular, normal weather cycles, including extreme weather, as “proof” of “Global Warming,” or “Climate Change.” They tried to explain that any warming that may or may not be going on wouldn’t necessarily dramatically alter weather patterns in the near term.

THIS is why meterologists are skeptics. They know weather, and the historical patterns over time. We are being fed hysteria by activists, politicians, and financial interests who want to profit from the panic; if we follow through on the draconian, ill-conceived Cap & Trade and other insane legislation, it will be an invitation to the worst corruption humanity has ever seen. Any actual warming that may be going on is more likely the result of Earth doing a slaw crawl out of the so-called “Little Ice Age,” and will not result in cataclysms except possibly at the margins.
Humanity has lived through milder periods than ours (that’s right, what may be going on is a “milding,” not a catastrophic “warming”), during the Bronze Age, the High Middle Ages, and perhaps other periods. Arctic ice has melted and re-formed time and again in modern times, as newspaper accounts from 1881, 1921, ‘33′ 35′, etc. have attested to.

On top of everything else, the “Climategate” affair exposed incredibly sloppy record-keeping, dubious and undisciplined statistical models, crude computer modeling that didn’t even make use of supercomputers, plus we now find that the weather stations and remote-sensing stations in many places world-wide are appalingly maintained and neglected, and the data from many were not even factored into the supposed statistical “proof.” And some weren’t even altered to account for the heat-island effect (they’re no longer in “remote” areas due to suburban sprawl).
If this were a court case, the AGW case “judge” would have to declare a “mistrial,” because of both tampering with the evidence, and “police” and “prosecutorial” “incompetence and misconduct.” Like an actual court case where the “defendant” (“AGW”) may actually be “guilty,” the case has to be thrown out and retried. There is no sense in demanding policies costing trillions of dollars that will have a more profound effect on human activity than any possible “global warming” might if the evidence has been tampered with.

Yep.

Facist Doctrine-Phase Six...Fruition

I've said all I can about this. Read it and weep...literally.

Sleeping with the Enemy

First there was the question of his alleged fraudulent social security number in Connecticut, along with his clear disdain for ally, Israel. If there was any doubt to President Obama's disloyalty to America's allies (the bowing, the apologizing, the general lack of admonishment towards Iran, Russia, Venezuela, China and Cuba) now he wants to play nice with Hezbollah.
Really. When will you Obama supporters wake up to the fact that he's the most radical, un-American, inexperienced "leader" in the 234-year history of the republic? People, he is a joke!Unfortunately, not the "ha ha funny" kind. Don't give me this line about "moderate" elements within Hezbollah. If your in Hezbollah, you live to destroy Israel. You live to kill Christians and you deplore everything American. There is no such thing as a moderate member of Hezbollah. They are a terrorist organization backed by Iran. Instead of demoralizing them, Obama wants to endorse and legitimize them. What more do you possibly need to know?

He will be the ruin of the United States. In many (or is that most) ways, he already is. No president has done so much in so little time to weaken America.
Do you need any more evidence? All past presidents have had their shortcomings, even colossal screw-ups, but none have been such an embarrassment as to thoroughly cripple America (yes, even including Jimmy Carter) as this man.

Say what you will, the evidence is insurmountable.

Obama Signs Freedom of Press Act Then Denies Freedom

Nevermind that the constitution already provides freedom of the press (another thing the former constitutional scholar apparently didn't know) but the president apparently doesn't think a new law doesn't apply to him or his administration

Afghanistan Claims 1000th U.S. Serviceman

Like the heading says...grim.
Heros all.

In a related story, Taliban attacks are once again increasing in Afghanistan.

Spector Defeated

And with that he is outta here!! Clearly, the voters of Pennsylvania had enough and saw through his obvious charade and attempt to hold onto power. It appears his little "bait and switch" of political parties had no affect for him (other to expose him as the irrelevant, power-hungry career politician that he is) and only made things worse for the financial stability of the nation due to his part in Obama care.

Bon voyage Arlie!

Scandal on Both Sides

Except the difference is one is a hypocrite who resigned, the other is a liar who is continue to embarrass himself and his constituents with continued lies. Which one do you think is a Democrat and which one is a Republican?

One, Republican Representative from Indiana, Mark Souder was having an affair with a part-time staff member. He is an obvious hypocrite because of his stance on abstinence, as well as cheating on his wife. He met with GOP Chairman, Michael Steele and resigned.

Meanwhile Democrat, Attorney General of Connecticut, Richard Blumenthal lied numerous times over the years about serving in Vietnam. He did in fact enlist in the Marine Reserve, but never went to Vietnam as a soldier and certainly never saw combat. Documents prove he is a liar, yet he continues to try and mislead people about his non-service by saying he won't allow anyone to "impugn his service."
If you notice this part of the story, "Mr. Blumenthal, 64, is known as a brilliant lawyer who likes to argue cases in court and uses language with power and precision. He is also savvy about the news media and attentive to how he is portrayed in the press."
That means he knew what the press was writing about him because (not unlike 99% of politicians that are narcissists) he keeps up on what they're saying about him. Therefore he knew what the press were saying and what people were reading about him, yet he consciencely decided to let the lies continue.

But isn't this just typical about the differences when scandals happen to Republicans and Democrats. One party either dispatches with the guilty member or he/she resigns on their own, while the other holds on to power, backed by the criminal-coddling DNC and the liberal media; John Murtha, Robert Byrd, William Jefferson to name but a few.

I guess you can't blame them entirely. Some blame has to go to the idiots who keep voting these people back into office. But I always get a good laugh out of those who try to label the Republicans with being the party of scandal (and they've had more than their fair share) while continually protecting by lying, cheating, thieving Democrats (just like child molesters, terrorists, cop killers, etc) The list goes on and on.

Like I said...typical.

His excuse..he "misspoke."
Yeah right.
"I will not allow anyone to take a few misplaced words and impugn my record of service to our country."
Again, he knew what the press had recorded what he had said and never bothered to correct the record. So, nobody is impugning his record of service. He did that himself.

Texas Doctors See Writing on the Wall Over Obamacare

The president of the Texas Medical Association says, "Medicare system is beginning to implode."

A Message from the President

Incompetance Soldiers On in Obama Administration

While there are a plethora of incompetent know-nothings in the Obama administration (you'll notice I've never once called it a regime) Attorney General, Eric Holder has to take the cake (with Dept. of Homeland Security secretary, Janet Napolitano a close, close second) it was bad enough he showed his racism, ignorance and arrogance by refusing to prosecute members of the Black Panthers for intimidating voters during last years general election, or when Obama's SIEU thugs attacked a Tea Partier, but between giving terrorists Miranda rights and not even knowing who the terrorists are or why they hate America, or admonishing an immigration law he hasn't even read...this guy is due for a review of American law.

If he's even read anything on that.

Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. has said that Arizona's tough new immigration law could drive a wedge between police and immigrant communities. He has expressed concerns it could lead to racial profiling, and he has made it clear that his Justice Department is considering a lawsuit to block the legislation from taking effect.

"Have you read the Arizona law?" Rep. Ted Poe (R-Tex.) asked.
"I have not had a chance. I grant that I have not read it," Holder acknowledged.

Racial Myths and Realities

Keeping up on the spin of history, especially that of slavery and internment.
It's amazing to me how so-called historians can simply erase the part of mankind's existence (god or bad) that they simply don't like. Even if it is true. But what's even more contemptible is making things up that are not. It's bad enough when one race tries to embarrass or lie about another. But when members of the same race lie about their own, it astounds me. White, black, Asian, native, Latino, whatever. It just astounds me how so many can be so ignorant to history. Even more so is that sometimes they want these allegations to be true. Unfortunately they are sometimes, but I think more often than not the bleeding-heart type have been indoctrinated so much (and before I forget, pick up Michael Medved's book, The 10 Big Lies About America; it's an eye-opener) that they don't even question any blame their race has been fitted with, even when it's not true. White guilt is especially rampant (as the article indicates)

These people have come to the conclusion (and then inundate their children-and others-with an alternate, false, historical record. This is especially egregious when one omits (either by true ignorance or willful blindness) the facts of one's own race and their suffering at the hands of tyrants and dictators throughout history. Whitey isn't the only one that has committed racial atrocities. I'd wager to bet you'll find that "white crimes" throughout history were far less cruel and common than you've been led to believe.

Shameful. This is not going to help race relations any time soon.

The Left's Preponderance with Race

As always, a wonderful, thought-provoking, true-to-fact article from the master of logic, Dennis Prager.

Holder Refuses to Admit Islamic Terror is Islamic Terror

Political correctness, appeasement and ignorance all rolled into one.
At least he didn't say these were "man-made disasters." I can't believe how utterly daft this man, his boss and the whole administration is to this most obvious, in-your-face, clear and present danger. What a bunch of cowards. Isn't their job, first and foremost to protect American citizens from all enemies foreign and domestic? Or do they just consider people that represent the Tea Party, Christianity, or FOX News the real threat to America?
I guess they might, just might understand when the crescent moon is flying over the White House.

Obama administration: Dont. Have. A. Clue.

This is How All Useful Idiot Reporters Should Be Spoken To

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie had some sobering words for a double-standard espousing reporter at a news conference. It was a beautiful thing, really.

Unfortunately, these Eyeblast.tv videos don't want to be embedded as of late, but never fear, here is the link from Newsbusters.

ObamaCare to Cost $115 Billion More than Thought

I think a few people (Sowell, Krauthammer) can now say "I told you so."
You're not really surprised are you?

More Trouble For AZ Governor?

It seems Arizona governor, Jan Brewer keeps trying to do the right thing by enforcing immigration laws (you the law of the land that Washington refuses to do) and this one is going to cause her more headaches with the pro-illegal Latinos and their pity crowd. I see more violence and riots coming...you know, the things that the Tea Party are not doing.

In a related story (to the AZ immigration law)

Does This Constitute Fraud?

Or at least a misdemeanor? You know as in "High Crimes and Misdemeanors?" BWA-HAHAHAH! Not bloody likely. Wishful thinking and all that. I think that will eventually come to pass. Why? Well, the man is a tinge arrogant, even for a liberal elitist. He thinks that he's too "all-powerful." He talks a great game (but so did Hitler) and he'll go too far before his term is up (yes, that's one, single, lonely little term) and do something that warrants impeachment. Yes. I do actually believe that. Why again? Well, not only because it seems to be their destiny and lot in life, but it's just plain fitting; and that is he's a Democrat. Impeachment score...Democrats 2, Republicans 0. It's just in their blood you see.

Anywho, let's see where this goes. And probably nowhere, if the MSM has anything to do with it.

America Would Be Better Off Without Its Universities

An exellent opinion piece by a contributor at Associated Content by the user name of "garyganu".

I am dumbfounded about how today's generation is oblivious to the political news and traditional social norms in today's fast changing world. Many of today's college educated students are oblivious to American history and how our American government is structured. My generation learned civics (American government) and history in our "social studies" classes. Instead, today's high school youth are indoctrinated with the concept of diversity as a virtue (in and of itself), African American studies (which portrays America as a racist and bigoted country) and world history classes which portray America as a cruel, war mongering imperialist nation. But the most overwhelming problems that cause political ignorance amongst the youth is the fact that iPods don't have news breaks on the top and bottom of every hour.

I attribute most ignorance in the "me generation" to the fact that they constantly have iPods plugged into their ears when they are not texting, talking on cell phones or blasting loud "music" (I use the term loosely). My generation was forced to listen to news and current events when we listened to the radio. Today's youth overwhelmingly choose to avoid hard news. They are mostly interested in gossip, celebrity news and extreme unconventional, dangerous and abnormal behaviors that are glorified by today's popular culture. Today's youth form their opinions of world politics through the liberal prism of today's public schools and universities and from the musical lyrics that promote annoying, illegal, sexist, intolerant, immoral, atheist and inconsiderate behavior in the name of "freedom of expression". However, freedom of expression is never tolerated of those who have opposing views. They believe that people with traditional conservative views are hateful, racist, sexist, bigoted, greedy and evil who should be shouted down, ridiculed, ostracised and silenced.

They have strayed so far from social norms that they don't even realize that it is inconsiderate to blast obscene music at 100 decibels from their car stereos at a gas station with all doors and windows open. Onlookers are too intimidated to call them out on their rude, annoying and inconsiderate behavior. When I politely ask them to turn it down a bit, the response has always been loud, angry, threatening and vulgar. The more I persist, the more enraged and closer to violence they appear to get. The same attitude holds true for the owners of many cars, trucks and motorcycles that spend hundreds of dollars to modify their exhaust systems to be deafeningly loud. They either are completely unaware that this is illegal, inconsiderate, annoying and rude or they are purposely trying to flaunt the law and be rude, inconsiderate and annoying . It their upside down world, it is a virtue (cool and funny) to be obnoxious.Motorcyclist justify their loud exhaust by claiming that "loud pipes save lives". They claim that motorists often do not see the small profile of a motorcycle, but they are sure to hear them if their exhaust is loud enough. However, I believe that this claim is disingenuous because most loud motorcycle riders in Florida choose not to wear protective helmets.

Once, I noticed an obnoxiously loud motorcycle sitting next to me at a red light. I told the rider that his "loud pipes" were annoying and inconsiderate. The rider, who sported a patch that read "loud pipes save lives", didn't appreciate my freedom of expression and he threatened to shoot me. Apparently he had no interest in saving my life. I see America's social, political and economic systems being torn to shreds because of the attitude and behavior of today's "me generation". If this continues Americas exceptional success will become unsustainable and we will collapse as a nation and culture.

Amen brother.

Muslims Are Intolerant of Homosexuals?

Well, duh! At least, according to this article, 72% in Britain are. But they can't possibly have the same opinions about them here in North America, right?

Is this really surprising, given the fate of homosexuals in Islamic countries such as Iran and Saudi Arabia? Everybody with half a brain and any sort of common sense, know this is true to fact. Everybody knows that intolerance of gays shown by Islamists (and I'm guessing devout Muslims in general-and as the author stated within the article itself, 72% is not a generalization. I'm pretty sure it's a heavy majority) is protected somehow, bizarrely, protected by free speech (and only for Islamists) and political correctness. I don't have to tell you-unless you're a devout Muslim yourself, in which case you're further protected by the Koran's ability to lie to infidels or simply a devout liberal; in which case you're probably just a hypocrite when you say you're all for gay rights, yet chastise Christians for the same "intolerance," but are simply afraid to state your beliefs for fear of violent reprisal against anything the Islamists do or say.

You doubt it. Well then, number one, you're an ignorant fool, but moreover, prove me wrong. Show me a devout imam that says being gay isn't a sin or doesn't deserve death.

As for the so-called feminists that are supposedly looking out for all women, their disgusting silence speaks volumes. They're too busy attacking female conservative political figures. More importantly, like all of the rest of the liberal elites, they're too scared. That's the ace-in-the-hole for these violent, intolerant Muslims, they know if there is enough fear put forth, they can continue their intolerance, bullying and violence unabated. Forget the ACLU, U.N, FAIR *chuckle* and any other organization that purports to "protect" the rights of citizens, or any sort of news organization-short of FOX-to inform you of what's going on in their hearts and minds. They're just as scared to become the next Theo Van Gough. And if they do attempt to inform, they're fined, bullied and threatened. They're too busy and much less fearful of condemning the Christians, the Catholic church, conservatives, the Tea Partiers and anyone or anything else that doesn't threaten you with death if they don't like what you do or say.

Where's your intolerance with that?\

UPDATE:
Not that it has to be said (because I think it was quite clear and I've made it so in past posts) but upon reading this column, I feel I must reiterate that I'm obviously not talking about "real" Muslims who are peaceful, family-oriented people, but that this post was directed solely at whom I actually did mention-Islamists. The die-hards, the radicals, the Islamic abominations that have high-jacked the religion for their own ungodly purpose.
This is not a typical "apologizing/appeasement to Muslims" that right-wingers have to do at times not to catch grief because bleeding hearts fail to catch the real message, but by simply and unintentionally interchanging"Islamists" and "Muslims," it may have been seen as anti-Muslim instead of anti-Islamist (e.g. Islamofascist)

Speak No Obama Evil

Remember the glory days of Bush Derangement Syndrome when every member of every left-wing media establishment went bonkers with glee whenever a liberal author would appear on cable shows such as everything on MSNBC and the network morning shows promoting anything on paper that portrayed President Bush as a numbskull, drug addict, etc?

Well, how times have changed. Although there have been several books put out about the background and radical Alinsky policies of Barack Obama (Michelle Malkin's Culture of Corruption, David Freddoso's The Case Against Barack Obama & Jerome Corsi's Obama Nation to name a few) it seems the liberal heads at AOL, the Huffington Post, The Nation & Newsweek aren't too happy with Aaron Klein's new book, "The Manchurian President."

Possibly because it puts their messiah in a bad, exposed, light; or it simply doesn't jive with their ideology that Obama is even better than sliced bread.

They never had a problem with the numerous books full of fallacies and unsourced material about Bush over the years, or that of Karl Rove and Condoleeza Rice (where was the concern about racism on that one?) but I digress.
I guess it's their job to be the book-keepers for this generation and its their job to decide what you can read and what you can't. Because you see, if it were up to them, only liberal, non-sensical claptrap would be in your children's textbooks and in the public libraries. Heck, even your private collection wouldn't have any dissenting views or actual truth about their Great Leaders of history. You do know that there's actual history and liberal history, right?

What was that about what Obama said at his commencement speech at UM? Read opposing views? I wonder if these cretins know they're in direct defiance of their Chosen One?

American Servicemen March on Red Square

A Cold War victory parade? I never thought I'd see this in my lifetime. Anyone who lived through the Cold War era has to be thinking the same thing. Actually it was a celebration of the Allies victory over the Nazis in World War II. Still, it's the first time U.S, French and British forces have had military parades in the heart of Russia.




Pretty cool, huh? But, um, where were the Canadians and Australians?

Apparently some inside of "Mother Russia" are not all that happy about it:

"Author Alexander Prokhanov, editor in chief of the nationalist Zavtra daily, called the appearance of U.S. servicemen in Red Square a national humiliation.
'The fact that American troops are trampling underfoot the cobblestones of Red Square is a huge shame and humiliation for Russia,' Prokhanov said. 'Thus they are celebrating their final victory not in World War II but in the Cold War."

I wonder if the Russians force enough "woe is us" crap toward the Obama administration, that the prez will do his usual bowing and apologizing? It seems to have had a great success so far in foreign relations.

Teacher Calls for Revolution

A little bit of old news. I figure you may have heard about this through the mainstream channels, but alas, the MSM doesn't do it's job again. Just imagine for a moment, if you will, that this guy was a Tea Partier. How much fuel and, dare I say, excitement, would this drive the liberal media into a meteroric frenzy?

Imagine if a prominent (or any, for that matter) Tea Partier had said, "There's [300] million potential revolutionaries north of the border, inside the belly of the beast." Writing a book "is not part of the movement," and that some "other means of revolutionary" tactics are needed.

Why am I picturing 1789 France and 1917 Russia?

Once again the MSM is mum. Hmm. There wouldn't happen to be a just a smidgen of liberal advocacy here, would there?

Did I mention this guy is a history professor? Do we really have to guess what his students are "learning?"

Giant Mosque to Be Built Next to Ground Zero

Does anybody else think this is just one big slap in the face? No one thinks this is insensitive? No PC police on patrol here. Nevermind the connotations, the insult to the victims families, the dereliction of any common sense. It's all about appeasement and apathy...to the wrong people.

Of course it's racist to condemn this. Of course it's intolerance. Opposing it has absolutely nothing to do with concern or outright decency. Nah. Everything is fine with it. [sarc.]

Some supporters clearly have it going on upstairs and are not misinformed or ignorant what-so-ever.
Matt Migeal, 39, who was selling 9/11 photo books in front of the World Trade Center on Wednesday, also thought it was good for the mosque to move in.
"This didn't happen because of Muslim people," Migeal said, gesturing toward the site. "Terrorism and Islam have nothing to do [with each other]."

See. All is well.

A commenter had a good one:
"...how about a Nazi memorial to brave Waffen SS soldiers next to the Holocaust museum? Wouldn't that be "tolerant?"

UPDATE: Families oppose...

Speaking of Syndromes...

Maybe the current President of the United States is simply, I don't know, insane? That's the only word that comes to mind when you encompass his audacity, arrogance, racism, narcissism and myriad of other delusional, self-important, grandiose speeches, quotes and actions. I would doubt you can come to any different conclusion after reading the above link written by Ali Sina. It was written before the 2008 election, but in spite of that it dose not read as out of date. And unfortunately it didn't help matters as the piece will demonstrate as to the role of the press and their fawning of the man. Come to think of it, this article is sort of an appendage to something I wrote in 2008 entitled, Obama: Man of the Left, just before the ascension, I mean, the election of Barack Obama.

This is the best thing I've read about Obama in a long time. That includes pieces from my favourites such as Thomas Sowell.

Did BDS Cause Shahzad's Attempted Attack?

Let me play the role of devil's advocate, or in this case a loony lefty reporter/commentator. What if, as this story at NewsBusters suggests, the liberal media's Bush Derangement Syndrome over the last nine years caused Time Square bomber, Faisal Shahzad to commit his crime?
Before any of you lefties cry foul and punch your computer screens, think about all the absolutely insane theories put forth by the likes of the MSNBC crew (especially those of the deplorable Kieth Olbermann) and other Bush-haters over the years. Add the networks coddling of John Murtha, John Kerry and Michael Moore (as one commenter pointed out) and their idea of U.S. soldiers being "cold-blooded killers"

Seriously, compare any rant by Olbermann, Ed Schultz, Chris Matthews and others over the years to the hypothesis by Noel Sheppard and tell me this doesn't have even a thimble full of credibility.

Is There a Better Reason?

This is a good enough reason alone to support Prime Minister, Stephen Harper.
Here he is rockin' it with "Canada's premiere KISS tribute band," DESTROYER:



Awesome.

Busted!

The Times Square Bomber (or attempted bomber) is in federal custody after caught trying to flee the country. Damn good job by authorities to grab him before he got away.

AhMADdinejad to Make an Impromtu Appearence at the UN

By the time you read this, Ahmadinewhackjob will have already made his idiotic, divisive and ultimately bogus speech to those lap dogs willing to listen. I was glad to read that even Secretary of Stae, Hillary Clinton knows what he's up to.

In a related story, did you hear that Iran is now on the UN Women's Rights Council? Yep. China and Libya on the Human Rights Council and Iran on the Women's Rights Council. Amazing, isn't it?

UPDATE: Here's the insane one's speech.
I guess he expected no one to remember his "Israel should be wiped off the map," comment.

Former Leftist Extremist Speaks Out

I'm actualy hestitant to post this link from a Big Government column from former leftist extremist, Brandon Darby. I always wonder at how, usually from the left but not foreign to the right, someone that was an extremist on either side can be taken seriously or be given any credibility at their word, but his knowledge of the leftist way of thinking and the information he possesses is quite valuable in today's radical-friendly, bias and blind media world.

The Only Green Al Gore Cares About is $$$

Duh. Not very surprising, even if the MSM doesn't think it's newsworthy. What else can I say about this complete fraud. I mean, he entered the school of Michael Moore's "Manipulate the Public and Line Your Pockets Anyway You Can," long ago. Why anybody would give this guy any credibility whatsoever is beyond me.

President Obama "Warns" the Jonas Brothers

Apparently some people are upset with President Obama regarding his joke about the Jonas brothers. I don't get it. Is this pre-pubescent version of NSYNC really insulted by this?

"The Jonas Brothers are here, they're out there somewhere. Sasha and Malia are huge fans, but boys, don't get any ideas. Two words for you: predator drones. You will never see it coming. You think I'm joking?"

I thought it was pretty good actually. Like last year's dinner the president was pretty funny. Not as funny as his boot-lickers suggest, but pretty good. Even if Comedy Central writers helped him with the material. The Jonas brothers, their fans and whomever else offended by this (I can't believe there are people that actually are) should really lighten up. He was a father making a joke about "rock stars" and his daughters. Relax.

Thomas Sowell on the Real Facts of Slavery

Man, I love this dude. Pay attention, and learn the truth. Like I've been saying for years, America wasn't the only (or worse) one with a stain on their history. Leave it to a man who is more eloquent and intelligent than I to explain it fully, if you're willing.

ODSD: Obama Double Standard Disease

I guess it's the sickness on the other end of the MSM's bias.
By Larry Elder. I sure do miss his radio show.

And He's an Investigative Reporter?

NBC's David Gregory (now infamous for the start of the "Teabagger" label) doesn't know his political history it seems. In 2007 then-Senator Barack Obama was one of 37 Democrats to help pass an amendment to the proposed immigration overhaul that would end a temporary worker program after five years in an ill-fated immigration reform proposal. And since funding for border security has declined since the Democrats took control of Congress and the current batch of Democrat race-baitors cry foul of anything anybody brings up to toughen immigration laws (you know for law-breaking "mostly peaceful" illegals and their supporters) you figure the all-knowing Gregory would know these things.

Still with the Dishonest Comparisons Between Immigration Protests and Tea Party Rallies

More "mostly peaceful," immigration protests and "ugly,"Tea Party rallies from the MSM; even after pro-Arizona law supporters were physically attacked and rioters caused $100, 000 worth of damage to local businesses in two different cities on Sunday.

Let's see, a years worth of Tea Party rallies-no attacks on anyone and no arrests. A week of Arizona immigration protests-rioting, damage and physical attacks.
Damn those "ugly" Tea Partiers!

Bill Maher Pseudo-Intelligence Exposed

How often does the liberal media allow talking points and so-called "facts" spewed by lefty politicians and celebrities go unchecked? Well, this smackdown by George Will on "Real Time's" Bill Maher is the only time I can remember that anyone on any type of panel discussion show has questioned a liberal's madness and ignorance lately. That is of course with the exception of Ariana Huffington having to have her foot surgically removed from her mouth twice within the last few weeks.

And he mocks Sarah Palin as uninformed? Watch him the next time he's on Joy Behar or The View, or some other liberal-apologizing, know-nothing lefty pundits show as he and his buddies just shrug it off. I'm surprised ABC didn't edit this portion out.

At least he's more (slightly) informed than a guy I had a debate in college with. We were on the subject of the Iraq war and he threw out the old liberal line of "It's all about the oil!"
When I asked him if that was indeed the case, why didn't the U.S. invade Canada or South America, there would have certainly been less resisitance (because you know America is evil and imperialistic and certainly wouldn't have thought twice about it)
He then ignorantly and astoundingly proclaimed "Because there is no oil in South America!" Of course in my usual sarcasm I told him he better inform Hugo Chavez about that one. That's pretty much when I was convinced that liberals share the same half-brain.

Bad Joke of the Day

Why doesn't Hungary just invade Turkey?
Get it? Yeah, I'm bored.

B.S. of the Day

Check out what the National Enquirer has to say about President Obama.

Common sense says this is total and complete crap. But remember this bowel movement screed did get the John Edwards story right. And if Obama and the MSM like to compare him to JFK, then this should be par for the course, right?

Again, just for the record, I do believe this is bogus, but people are going to talk about it. We are talking about the Obamedia here, though, so don't expect too much attention.

Obama Speaks Out Against Angry Rhetoric

And now for the obligatory agreement with President Obama. Enjoy. It doesn't happen too much. And it's only a comment or two.

When President Obama spoke at the commencement speech at the University of Michigan to an estimated crowd of over 80, 000, he used the opportunity to take aim at those who use "angry rhetoric" about the government being "inherently bad." He also spoke in his usual double-speak and somewhat of a hypocritical message. If only he stuck to his own words.

The most interesting and agreeable portion was when he said, "If you're a regular Glenn Beck listener, then check out the Huffington Post sometimes. If you read The New York Times editorial page the morning, then glance every now and then at The Wall Street Journal.
"It may make your blood boil. Your mind may not be changed. But the practice of listening to opposing views is essential for effective citizenship...Throwing around phrases like 'socialists' and 'Soviet-style takeover,"fascists' and 'right-wing nut' - that may grab headlines," he said. But it also "closes the door to the possibility of compromise.
At its worst, it can send signals to the most extreme elements of our society that perhaps violence is a justifiable response."

I'd say that that's pretty much on. Too bad he doesn't really believe it. I wish he did. But when the government takes over private companies, grows expedentially and wants to "spread the wealth" because "there are times when you can make too much money," that's socialism, like it or not.

Don't think there's hope for me. I agreed with Palin more.

Attempted Car Bomb in NY?

A little to much like what's going around Europe these days. Another close call for Obama. Hmm, where is he on this one? Doesn't look good for his people trying to convince concerned citizens that he's actually trying to protect the country now does it?

I Was Waiting For This Comparison

So where is the comparisons between Bush's Katrina and Obama's oil spill? Well, here's one. I know, I know; Obama acted "right away." So did Bush contrary to popular opinion (read lefty media lies) the difference being federalism didn't stop Obama from reacting (days after the fact by the way) In his defense, golfing is pretty relaxing. He does have to get that handicap down.

Once a left-wing, Democrat-worshipping media, always a left-wing, Democrat-worshipping media. Shameful.

Just for the record, all kidding aside, I don't blame this on Obama, just as (due to the whole Kathleen Blanco/Ray Nagin dithering, along with the rules of Federalism) I didn't blame Bush for Katrina.

Palin Email Hacker Convicted

Not much time for the son of a Democrat (or didn't you know that?)

File Under: Are You F'n Crazy!?

Two little tidbits for you that really show the lunacy of bleeding hearts.

Chess is Racist: (H/T to Moonbattery)

Peter FitzSimons – the columnist who apologised to Osama bin Laden – tells a touching domestic tale:

With my son, not long ago, I was playing chess and I was white and he was black and I was winning and he started crying. And I said, `Why?’ And he said, `Because this reminds me of what happened to the Aboriginal people.’

And...

Animals Need Privacy.

I kid you not.

Only If It's Temporary

So President Obama has decided that because there was an alleged sabotage in the Gulf of Mexico, that is spilling an estimated 210,000 a day (obviously not a good thing) that he wants to cancel all off-shore drilling.

Ok, if this is just his way of not catching static from the populous for "not doing anything" about it (so he doesn't get "Bushed," like the press wouldn't give him a pass anyway) and making sure things are cleaned up before moving on, fine. But if this is to placate to the phonies like Al Gore, it's just another failure in a long list of abysmal failures.
Oh, and thanks for making your buddy Chavez more richer, too.

Legal Hispanic Immigrant Speaks Out on SB1070

Go ahead race-baitors, call her on this. Tell her she doesn't know what she's talking about. Tell her that she's a racist and she's divisive. Tell her she's full of hate.