MSNBC and the Continuing Edited Video Legacy

And yet again MSNBC is guilty of selectively editing video.  This time it's snooty, arrogant Martin Brashear and his (surprise) dishonest editing team that has successfully lied to their puny little audience of sheep again in an attempt to elicit emotional support, using dead children as political props, to ban "assault" weapons like the AR-15.

Let me be totally clear, nobody should have said anything (First Amendment aside) to Neil Heslin, father of slain Sandy Hook victim, six-year-old Jesse Lewis while Heslin was giving an emotional, heart-wrenching testimony at a Connecticut legislative meeting.  The man lost his "best friend, [his] buddy."  I am not a monster, nor am I immune to the emotion and sympathy such a testimony elicits.
However, my beef is not with Mr. Heslin or any of the Sandy Hook victims families.  My beef is with the continuing politicization of the left and especially the disgusting opportunists and manipulators on the left, especially at MSNBC and their deceptive, dishonest, out-of-context video manipulation and lies.

How many times are they going to get away with this?  How many times does it take for an Ed Schultz, Andrea Mitchell, Lawrence O'Donnell or now Martin Brashear to deliberately and without conscience lie to the world without any consequences whatsoever?  I know journalistic integrity was utterly destroyed when MSNBC went on the air, but doesn't anyone at NBC Universal care for the truth?  Anyone?

Breslin and the Sandy Hook families should be even more outraged that Brashear and MSNBC are using them as tools.

Liberal Logic

NY Mayor Bloomberg and Gun Control Hypocrisy

Isn't it amazing how liberals can want everybody else unarmed so they cannot protect their homes, families or themselves, yet total hypocrites like New York mayor Micheal Bloomberg, Diane Feinstein and a plethora of others are well protected day and night by security detail armed with guns? But it's o.k, they're card-carrying liberals, so naturally they get a pass from the press and the blue ribbon of arrogance from their moonbat friends. I'm surprised they didn't confiscate or smash the camera.

John Kerry Confirmed as New Secretary of State

The United States Senate has overwhelmingly confirmed Sen. John Kerry 94-3 to be the next U.S. Secretary of State.  He will be sworn in Wednesday.

MSNBC's Finney: "Crazy Crackers On the Right..."

The closet racists over at the DNC's MSNBC aren't so closeted anymore.  That is of course unless you count Toure Neblett, Al Sharpton and pretty much any "talent" they put in front of a camera.

But it was this little quip by former Democratic National Committee communications director Karen Finney who actually said, while discussing of all things, (yawn) Republican "code words" or "dog whistles" (whatever that means) for racist remarks, "...these guys know, those, you know, crazy crackers on the right, like if they start with their very hateful language...."
And nobody on the panel skipped a beat or even raised so much as an eyebrow to call her on it.  So clearly even the white panelists (you know the pasty white liberals that cry racism at everything even more than any black American would) agree with her racist assertions.


Finney tried to white-wash her racism on Twitter by saying she meant to say crackpots, because crackpot and cracker are the same thing.  Riiiight.

Simply Put

President Obama's version of America is a divided one - pitting us against each other based on our income level, gender, and social status. His policies have failed! We are not better off than we were 4 years ago, and no rhetoric, bumper sticker, or campaign ad can change that. 

                                                                             -Mia Love

Obama to Have His Day in Court

Unfortunately it's not to face impeachment.  However, a federal judge has ruled that ICE agents are free and clear to sue the president.  The agents charge that "unconstitutional and illegal directives from DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano and ICE Director John Morton ordered the agents to violate federal laws or face adverse employment actions."

Executive privilege be damned.  I hope that judge has a good pension.
By the way, this isn't the first judgment to go against Obama.

Thomas Sowell Outs Clinton

The always brilliant Thomas Sowell has soon to be former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's number in his most recent column, decrying her crying.

San Diego Police Chief Unveils Dems Real Strategy

It's not as though Dianne Feinstein and Piers Morgan haven't already shown the hand of the Democrats plan to eventually disarm all Americans in their zeal to do away with the second amendment, the San Diego Chief of Police William Lansdowne told a local news station that "if lawmakers play it right, Americans can be completely disarmed within a generation."  They actually think they're going to get away with this Nazism.

"The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow [American citizens] to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors [Democrats] who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let’s not have any native militia or native police. Troops [Obama's militia] alone will bear the sole responsibility for the maintenance of law and order throughout the... territories, and a system of military strong-points must be evolved to cover the entire country."
–Adolf Hitler, dinner talk on April 11, 1942, quoted in Hitler’s Table Talk 1941-44: His Private Conversations.

-Reprinted from a vigilant commentator.

Liberal Media Ignore Dem's Sex with Minors Scandal

It's time again to play "What If It Were A Republican?"

Democrat Senator Bob Menendez allegedly had sex with underage prostitutes while in the Dominican Republic the Daily Caller charges.  While we wait for the facts to come in, the mainstream media is oddly silent on the matter.  I say oddly because this should be a big story.  Probably even a bigger story than the Anthony Wiener Twitter scandal.  You'd figure regardless of who is involved in the story or party affiliation, the networks may want to garner some sort of up spike in their minuscule ratings.

Menendez obviously denies the allegations, but where is the top of the hour news briefs about it?  Yes, I haven't heard, up to this point, even one soundbite about the story let alone a whole report on it.
Apparently the MSM has known about this since at least August 1 of last year (probably even before then) but chose to sit on it.

So to get back to my opening question, how long do you think it would take for the MSM to hound Menendez if he were a Republican?  Yes.  That is a rhetorical question.

Liberals Gullibility Knows No Bounds

Wasn't it just last week that MSNBC's Martin Brashear fell hook, line and sinker for a false story designed to elicit humor?
As I mentioned in this post, I can't say I'm surprised at not only the naivete and lack of humor of the left , but these leftist "twits" that actually thought Tammy Bruce was serious really need to get out more.  While they're out, they may want to rent a George Carlin video or something that will teach them about humor and the way it's delivered.

Toure Says Abortion "Saved" Him...from Being A Father

Apparently, MSNBC's resident heir to the race-baiting throne, Toure (you know like Cher or Madonna) thinks a woman whom he impregnated then decided to abort her child "saved his life" from being a young father.  So Toure being "saved" from fatherhood is on par with an abortion saving...who?

Honestly, what a complete idiot!

And I must share a quote from a commenter who said, "Didn't save the innocent baby from getting torn to pieces or burned to death from saline solution but saved a self-absorbed fool for not taking responsibility for his own actions. Whew! That's a close one!"
And another one shared my sentiments that I've been saying for years, "What if the fetus is female? Are her Rights to Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness being infringed? 

Obama Blames Press for Being Too Nice to Republicans

It's official.  The president of the United States is a delusional narcissist who sincerely believes that the media should attack Republicans more, due to them blaming Democrats more than Republicans for America's ills.  In other words Obama thinks the media is too nice to the GOP.

What kind of Socialist-utopian matrix does this guy live in?

Obama-Clinton Love Affair Just A Continuation

There's nothing new with the liberal, mainstream media defending and spinning everything President Obama does, and I mean everything.  It's not even that surprising to see the media slobbering over the congressional statements concerning Benghazi by Hillary Clinton. Not to mention not calling Obama on his "joke" about Benghazi.   After that is one really surprised with the slobbering interviews and softball questions by the likes of Steve Kroft?

There's a reason it's become "Syrupy Minutes."

But really, do "respected" (chuckle) media types really think they're holding on to viewers-and their dwindling reputations-by fawning over Barack Obama like teenage girls at a Beatles concert. I expect fools like Al Roker to be the television goof that the is.  He's made a career on being the Today show's jocular weatherman.  But to have so-called (again chuckle) "respected" newsmen like CNN's Wolf Blitzer unabashedly dropping all pretense of professionalism and objectivity by giddily waving to the president after his second inauguration,

Don't even get me started on the plethora of examples of slobbering, unprofessional liberal news sycophants championing Obama's inauguration, like CNN, playing up the savior angle yet again.  Oh, and still finding time to blame Bush as well.

What defense is left to declare the MSM is not totally biased and just a continuation of the propaganda arm of the Democrats?

Liberal Media Ignore March for Life, Report on Inconsequential Gun Control "Rally"

The disgusting liberal media are at it again.  When do they ever stop being disgusting, I know.  But how do they even think they're objective (or better yet, how do they think they're getting away with their thinking that they're fooling anyone)

On January 25, tens of thousands of people gathered in Washington, DC for the March For Life, that coincidentally coincided with the 40th anniversary of Roe vs Wade virtually ignored by the mainstream media (which really hasn't been all that mainstream since...well since Watergate) but oddly enough they managed to find time to report on less than a thousand people gathered to support gun control legislation.
For those left-wing media outlets that did plug their noses and begrudgingly mentioned the march, they couldn't even bring themselves to use the word "life."

Piers Morgan: Not Much To Say?

In yet another boring and tired attempt to lecture law-abiding, legal gun-owning Americans of how "out of touch" they are, CNN host Piers Morgan once again tried to be the "voice of reason," as he sees it, and get two young female gun owners to say they don't need multiple-firing weapons to defend themselves.
In an attempt to throw the second amendment under the bus, Piers is left slack-jawed once again by people who know what they re talking about.

Have you noticed ever since he had his a$$ handed to him by Ben Shapiro that Morgan has turned his ignorance toward women gun owners.  FAIL!  He didn't do to well against them either.  You notice he trotted out that "how many of the three million Americans that own AR-15 ever used them to defend themselves?"  He got his answer didn't he?  Time permitting, he would have heard more.  Of course he would have cut them off before they finished the extensive list anyway.  At least he didn't call them "unbelievably stupid."  Funny, because these ladies were defending the same points as any other gun rights advocate he's had on.

In a related story, CBS is doing their best to brainwash Americans into giving up their guns, because, according to Charles Osgood, the United States constitution may not be "worthy of reverence."

MSNBC Lies about Another Law to Smear Right to Lifers

Nevermind the fact that the liberal media for the most part totally ignored the 40th March For Life, this happens so much that their sheep audience must think this is the classic, standard practice for journalism.  Pick a side, smear the people you disagree with (especially when the facts aren't on your side, so you have to make up stuff) then smear them again when they debunk your very easily affirmed B.S.

Such is the case again with yet another MSNBC host (along with The Huffington Post) who decided to use a false abortion law story to knowingly lie in order to smear conservatives.  The guilty party this time is Thomas Roberts.  From NBC and Andrea Mitchell's willful video editing deception to smear both George Zimmerman and Mitt Romney, to Ed Schultz's same method to smear Rick Perry as a racist, to all the misinformation and ignorance (and re-writing) of history by Rachel Maddow; why doesn't anyone on the left even remotely question these goofs?  Does the NBC Universal brass agree with this type of punk journalism and lies?  Apparently so.

Say what you want about FOX News (you know, the one conservative outlet-that still kicks their behinds in the ratings for the last 12 years by the way) but this joke of a network seems to have free reign in lying their asses off  and nobody on the left cares.  Why?  Because they obviously agree whole-heartedly with the way things are run at BSLSD.

Who Celebrates This?

Roe vs Wade 40 years later...

No Such Thing as Palestine-Part III

Five years ago I posted a link, along with some commentary, about the non-existence of "Palestine" and it's historical myth as told by Micheal Medved.  Then later I added Part II.  Here now is Part III assisted by a blogger known as "911Infidel," entitled, My Jihad is To Expose the Palestinian Myth.  Enjoy and learn.

A little history of Israel...

GMA Doesn't Mention Indicted Nagin as Democrat

Same ol', same 'ol.

Remember Ray Nagin?  The same Ray Nagin that labeled President George W. Bush a racist for not reacting "quick enough" to Hurricane Katrina?  The same Ray Nagin that neglected to bug out New Orleans citizens on rows upon rows of available, waiting school buses before the storm hit?

Well, it seems that Nagin himself is a traitor to his "own people" as he has been indicted on corruption charges related to a kickback scheme after Hurricane Katrina.  His party affiliation?  If you didn't already know, you wouldn't be any the wiser if you watched ABC's Good Morning America's reporting on it.  Not once did GMA utter Nagin's political allegiance, like they always do when a Republican is caught in a scandal.

And as usual, the rest of the left-wing media family followed suit and kept Nagin's political affiliation a secret from the masses of uninformed voters.

Keep on keeping on, MSM.

Flip Flops Continue for Obama; Pundits Continue to Cover for Him

If only Republicans could be treated by the press like Barack Obama does. Wouldn't it be wonderful if anything a Republican said as much as six to ten years ago that was viewed as "controversial" (as the words and actions of the right always are) just disappeared over time to cover any future chances of hypocrisy?  Yeah, too bad.

Another Victim of Obamacare

In the face of lower reimbursements under the federal Affordable Care Act, the Windber Medical Center will stop delivering babies after March 31 because its obstetricians are either leaving or refocusing their practices, and because hospital officials believe they can't afford it based on projected reimbursements under looming federal health care reforms.

Do These Fools Ever Have A Clue?

It's happened again.  A MSNBC host has fallen for yet another hoax meant to demean and vilify yet another Republican.  Once again, a story that was made up of whole cloth designed to elicit laughs was the prime source for Martin Bashear to slime a Republican politician, and Bashear is the proverbial fish with a hook in his mouth.  Can't say I'm surprised.

So the Left Doesn't Think Obama is A Deity?

Um...
Remember, this goes along with all the halo shots of the president while he was campaigning for the 2008 general election.

As well as Newsweek's Evan Thomas proclaiming Obama "In a way, Obama's standing above the country, above-above the world “In a way, Obama’s standing above the country, above — above the world. He’s sort of God."
Along with Thomas, all of the rest of the left fawning and drooling over his every word and action.  Even when he simply blows his nose.

Unbelievable.

Dishonest Morgan Still Loses Gun Debate Even with Loaded Panel and Audience

After having been thoroughly defeated (but typically unhumbled) by Ben Shapiro on his own show Piers Morgan Tonight on the gun debate, the cowardly dishonest Piers Morgan tried to stack the deck in his favor by loading the panel and his audience with gun crime victims.  Not to say these people don't have a valid point in this debate, but that's exactly what Morgan was counting on.  He was counting on the tears rolling and the emotions flying.  Never mind that debates require facts to and fro and not emotionally charged rhetoric.  That matters not to Morgan.  He doesn't care about gun control or people's welfare.  All he cares about is his legacy of being the voice of reason even though statistics and history dictate he most certainly is not.

The point of all this, at least in Morgan's case?  To seek revenge for his ego upon Shapiro for being decimated to the point of muteness the first time they met on air.  Once again the left proves their frailty.  They simply cannot deal with real facts.

Why Not?

In the interests of fairness and equality, two things the left professes to fight tooth and nail for, why can't students ant any college or university create a "white student union?"  If that's racist, then so are all the other non-white groups on campuses across America, right?

He's Just...Evolving

That's all.  The president isn't flip-flopping or creating an advantage by politicizing the debt ceiling , he's just evolving his opinion.

CNN: More Selective Editing

In the wake of Breitbart.com editor Ben Shapiro handing the petulant, arrogant and naive Piers Morgan behind to him in the on-going gun-control debate, the editors at CNN decided that Morgan looked too defeated after being factually decimated to the point where he couldn't answer the simplest of questions, so they decided to put into practice their tried and true (although exposed multiple times) tactic of manipulative editing to hide the fact that not only Morgan doesn't know what he's talking about, but to also show that Second Amendment supporters like Alex Jones are made to look like ranting lunatics (although in Jones's case they're not that far off)

So when lefties like Piers Morgan are rightfully discredited (and quite easily at that it turns out) their brethren at CNN (his show's host network) once again take to misleading the public with willful, manipulative video editing.  And they wonder why their ratings are in the toilet.

In case you didn't see the whole Ben Shapiro segment before CNN mutilated it for their own selfish and willful deception of the American people, here it is:

Love Him or Hate Him

Actually I expect you to feel neither, as I do, about former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich.  He has his moments of clarity and logic and at other times he just seems frustrated at the lunacy of the left.  Regardless, I love to watch him handle the media the way everybody should when they go beyond their journalistic duty and stray over into activism.

Worse than Al Jazeera?

According to Glenn Beck, the former FOX News host and best-selling author, the fraudulent Al Gore, Jr, who we all know to be the "champion" of the environment and capitalism as it turns out getting (more) rich off of Global Warming sheep, not to mention avoiding 2012 taxes on the selling of Current TV to al Jazeera;  would rather sell Current TV to the Terrorist News Network than to anyone associated with FOX News.  The myth has grown that big folks.  Everybody knows that more truth and objectivity comes from the media arm of al Qaeda than the right-wing American news network.
Yep.  Patriotism unchained from Al Gore.

Who exactly are the enemy again?

From the O'Reilly/Beck interview:

O'Reilly: Well that’s what I want to say. How do you process it personally when you’re more loathsome to Al Gore than guys who glorify Osama bin Laden?

BECK:  (laughing): As a badge of honor. I want that on my resume. I want it on my resume. It’s a badge of honor that I am more loathsome that I am not anywhere close to his agenda, close to his values but Al Jazeera is closer.

And this guy was almost President of the United States.  That about says it all.

The Liberal Media in Their Natural Habitat

Reid Linked to Bribery Scandal?

A story that broke in the Salt Lake Tribune reports that an indicted business man named Jeremy Johnson believed he was voluntarily involved in a bribery scheme that involved Utah Attorney General John Swallow "brokering a deal in 2010 in which Johnson was to pay Sen. Harry Reid $600,000 to make a federal investigation into Johnson's company go away."

I so hope this is true.  Why?  Because I don't like the guy.  Weasel Harry Reid is an incompetent, lying, disgusting snake-oil salesman that will say anything to line his pockets with hard-working Americans tax dollars via pork and payola.  That's right.  I already believe he's guilty.  Why should he even get a trial or even anyone listen to his "explanation?"  It will just be a complete fabrication from start to finish anyway.  How do I know this?  Well, I don't.  I don't "know" anything about any accusations about anyone until the facts come out.

But I do know this fiend cannot be trusted.  Not because he's a liberal Democrat, although that's a huge reason, but because he has a history of such nefarious behaviour.  Most recently lying about Mitt Romney "not paying taxes for 10 years," that he "heard" from "someone who invested at Bain Capital."  Of course that was a complete and total lie and one that Reid has yet to answer for.  Of course the media has yet to take him to task for it either.  But there are other instances of Weasel's dishonesty and malfeasance.  In 2007 Reid was in the middle of a shaky under priced land deal.  In August of last year Reid was involved in green energy conflict of interest shenanigans.  As I mentioned, he's certainly not one to shy away from payola.  And these are just recent examples.

I really have a feeling some time soon that this despicable excuse for a human being is going to get what's coming to him.  I think he thinks he's untouchable.  And why not?  So far he has been.  Hopefully soon, very soon, he'll be a has-been.  Then watch all the typical slobbering of liberal adulation that is usually heaped upon such tyrants of the left when one of their own has been exposed.
Then he'll probably get his own show on MSNBC.

Too Funny

Gregory Won't Be Prosecuted

Not that it was a big deal anyway, even though the law is the law, NBC's David Gregory will not be prosecuted for "exhibition of a high-capacity bullet magazine...despite the clarity of the violation of this important law.

In case you missed it, Gregory came under fire (sort of speak) for brandishing an illegal high-capacity gun magazine on Meet the Press that Gregory and NBC were told by D.C. police that they could not use as a prop and then did anyway.  The fact that he didn't get prosecuted isn't really surprising.  I mean it's not like the guy is a Los Angeles gang-banger with a record a mile long, even though a small slap on the wrist and a public warning may have shown NBC brass and the public that liberal journalists and hosts are not above the law.  Apparently they are.

But the real question isn't whether he should have been prosecuted, the real question should be why wasn't he?  The answer may be a little shady.

Well At Least He's Protected

Tell me you didn't see this coming.  With one stroke of the pen President Barack Hussein Obama has ensured he and his family will have Secret Service protection for life.  Of course, as the story points out, former presidents have been receiving Secret Service protection after they left the White House for many years.  But not one of those former presidents, even Smilin' Jimmy Carter, rode a high-horse of hypocrisy about gun control, then signed into law a lifetime of protection from men with guns.

Is there a bigger or better word than hypocrite?

Matthews Calls A Republican A Bigot-What Else Is New?

He's still at it.  MSNBC Hardball host and perpetual race-baiter Chris Matthews (you know, the guy who sends his kids to a predominantly all-white private school and who didn't feel the need to invite any black people to his son's wedding?) rolled out the race-card yet again.  *YAWN* Excuse me.  This time it was Republican Congressman Steve King.  I'll just let you read the hyperbole that I've come to identify as "Chrissyisms."

CBS Tells of Firearm Self-Defence; NBC, ABC Not So Much

To their credit, CBS actually ran a story of Georgia woman who defended her home and her children from an intruder with a handgun.  The other networks simply whined about how "furious" and "accusatory" the National Rifle Association is with the Obama administration.

Mind you, CBS chose to air one story from literately thousands, but at least it's a nice departure from the rest of the liberal media and their "guns are bad...period" meme.

Oh Ed

You know, it's getting quite entertaining (if not outright ridiculous) about just how little the left really knows about the Second Amendment and facts surrounding shootings throughout the last 20 years or so.  It's to the point now where it's not even about gun control anymore.  It's increasingly about how the elitists on the left really do not care about the safety of their fellow citizens, only about their legacy of "best intentions."  I mean we have the astonishingly ignorant and at the same time just as astonishingly arrogant Piers Morgan, who when confronted with facts he simply cannot debate, resorts to infantile name-calling.  Not surprising coming from a lefty, but Morgan is viewed as some intellectual know-it-all who supposedly cannot lose.  But it seems all he wants people to know about-given his actions as opposed to intentions-is how much people are "unbelievably stupid" because they don't agree with his opinions and shredding of the Constitution.  Too bad he doesn't know he already has lost on the debate and numbers front.



Ed Schultz on the other hand has proven his idiocy time and time again.  I really don't know what the color the sky is in his tiny world, but once again he pseudo-confidently misinformed his less than tiny audience (check his ranking in Talkers magazine...if you can find it) that there has "never been a civilian that has stopped a shooting."  That's right, never!

Forget about the security guard that saved potentially "hundreds of lives" in Colorado Springs in 2007, forget about the civilian who stopped a stabbing spree in Salt Lake City back in April.  Or how about in 2002 when a shooter was stopped by two students with personal firearms?  What about an off-duty police officer stopping a shooter in San Antonio with her own personal firearm last month, just three days after the Sandy Hook shooting?  Does this guy even hear himself?  Does he realize, even a little bit, of how much of a fool he has been for so long.  Let's not even get into his deceptive editing as a tool to pull the race card like he did with Rick Perry.

More examples...

These examples are in no way meant to marginalize the shootings or disrespect the victims, but merely to show how the paranoid and ignorant left (or worse, potential outright liars) twist, misrepresent and manipulate the facts to their own benefit.  They think of nothing of the future victims they are surely creating by wanting to disarm Americans.  Oh, they say they don't want to disarm people and they're all for self-defense, but when they use words like "confiscate," it tells a much different story.

The bottom line is, yeah, I wouldn't take anything Ed Schultz has to say (really about anything) to heart without knowing his gaffe lie-filled history...which he also foolishly denies.

Two Wounded in Theatre Shooting in San Antonio; Armed Off Duty Cop Stops Suspect-Media Mum

Maybe idiots like Piers Morgan who want the death of even more children..and woman...and home owners will have their Communist dream of unarming law-obeying citizens come to fruition.  It will never happen of course, so Morgan and his ilk can go on calling Americans who disagree with him "idiots" and "mass murder enablers" while his type go on judging people when they live safe and care-free in their ivory towers along with their armed guards.  Or the type like Dianne Feinstein who when confronted with violence themselves, purchase a firearm, while attempting to stop those who feel the same.

But what about the other shifty arms of the media machine?  You'd figure after Columbine, Ft. Hood, Aurora or Newtown, that someone would be looking for a feel-good story, or at least a story of a shooting that had minimum casualties; or how about no casualties (two injured) in another theatre shooting, this time in San Antonio, Texas.

Well that's what happened when a lone gunmen, walked into a theatre in the Texas city and opened fire on the crowd of movie-goers just three days after the Sandy Hook elementary school massacre.  Except you really didn't hear much about this one I bet (if at all).

And why is that?  Wasn't this a great opportunity by dicks like Morgan to reap more tyranny on a free people, to show yet another shooting that they can role out their pomp and circumstance of righteousness and moral certitude?  You know why they didn't?  Because there were no fatalities and the perpetrator was stopped by an armed off-duty police officer.  So either they didn't report it because there was no blood and gore, which makes them more ghoulish than even I thought possible, or the narrative of the story isn't what they wanted or hoped, that an armed person with a gun stopped a crime, but potentially more, which is again what the media were probably hoping for, which again makes them evil, disgusting ghouls.

New Obama Picks Typically Up His Ally

When you take a close look at President Obama's new choices for head of the CIA and Secretary of Defense, John Brennan and Chuck Hagel, respectively, their past statements and modern opinions of those same beliefs show exact;y why Obama had them on his list of appointees; their beliefs are right up his anti-Israel/Marxist alley.  First off, RINO Hagel, who's anti-Israel and anti-gay remarks have caused him to gain numerous left-wing communist allies to those in the American MSM and Congress that, much like Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, would like to see the Jewish homeland disarmed and destroyed and gays put to death.  His anti-gay comments, which would predictably end the career of any Republican, have been magically forgiven by the left, who really do seem to forget their so-called principles when in dire need of a politician who has gone AWOL from the GOP.

No need to drag on or bring up hatred of homosexuals; he's already apologized for it, with the Democrat paper-of-record in his corner, it's already forgotten about.  No doubt to be completely erased from the annals of liberal history.  After a while they'll just argue the comment never happened.  That's what's called the RINO Special.  No need for a public flogging or a need for him to resign.  He's a friend of the left now.  Remember Robert Byrd?  No matter how many times he uttered the word "nigger" in a 60 Minutes interview-supposedly after his apologies and letters of sorrow to the right people in the DNC-he could no longer do no wrong and his racist stench had now somehow become an aroma reminiscent of spring-morning lilacs.  Did I mention that Byrd was an actual member of the Klu Klux Klan?  No matter.  No crime is too big or racist ideology to grand for anyone on the left that can't go away inside of a week when the hypocritical left and their media enablers allow them to.

Brennan for his part, are you ready for this, says Islam "helped to shape his world view."  Do you think a CIA director should be in the camp of "Islam can do no wrong?"  Will he apologize "on America's behalf" of 250 years of American "imperialism?"  Will he "side with the Muslims, should the political winds change?

And this is the temperament and ideology Obama looks for in his cabinet.  Everyone from Eric Holder to Timothy Geithner to Janet Napolitano to Susan Rice.  All extremists, all willing to lie and smear opponents to the bidding of Obama.  Obama's pathetic and historically deficient ideology himself?  That's another story entirely consisting of a domestic terrorist colleague and friend, a radical ideology and associations and a unimpeded, undeserved trip to the top of the political world that includes a compliant media with too much white guilt to ask honest questions.

Prediction:  with these beauties in the Obama administration, Iran will get the bomb, facilitate further terrorist activities into Israel (which Obama and Hagel will secretly rejoice over) Obama will inevitably give his "there-there" consolation speech to the people of Israel (with their homeland most likely smoldering in the background) while doing absolutely nothing about it.

Piers Morgan: Asshole Extrordinaire

Anybody who has read this blog for any extended period of time knows I try to refrain from expletives.  I either find some better synonym or simply use the old tried and true "comic strip" version such as "@#%!" for example.

But when it comes to Piers Morgan, the former host of useless "reality" television show, Britain's Got Talent and current host of Piers Morgan Tonight, who took over the Larry King slot on CNN, he's quite simply an anti-American asshole.  There's just no other way to explain this goof.  It's one thing to debate the merits or negatives of the Constitution, it's quite another to tell citizens of a country you are simply a guest of that those citizens are "unbelievably stupid" to believe and defend in the hallmarks of the amendments and rights of that constitution.  This, much like President Obama who called for civility after the shooting of Rep. Gabriel Giffords (by indirectly blaming the shooting on the Republicans in general and Sarah Palin in particular) then blamed people who "clinged to their bibles and guns," before telling his supporters, "if they [Republicans] bring a knife to the fight, we'll [Democrats] bring a gun!"  Proving their hypocrisy and double standard which Morgan is faithfully following.  Speaking of faith.  Morgan claims to be a Christian, yet chastises every single thing that Christians are blamed for (usually unjustly) and does not defend his own supposed faith when Atheists, haters and the left-wing anointed "tolerant" disgustingly misrepresent the Bible in general and Christianity in particular.  Not exactly a spokesmen for the faithful.

To tell a guest on his show (filled with heavily fellow liberal and anti-American foreigners as panellists) that has vastly more experience in gun crime numbers (in both America and Britain) that he is a liar and "quit peddling these lies.  You did it last week") is vastly ignorant, unprofessional and simply repugnant.

The left is always going on about not interfering in other countries affairs, yet when they are heralded as some sort of expert and given their own television show to bloviate their outdated, everything anti-American, left-wing, opinion-of-the-day rhetoric, they are somehow experts in everything  Along with perennial America hater Christine Amanpour (who famously had a "townhall" type panel to discuss the erection of a victory mosque in the shadow of Ground Zero in Manhattan, New York-again, as lefties love to do there was virtually no opposition to the insulting and insensitive building of such a symbol of the terrorism.  As much as it may not be, that's what the families and friends of the victims of 9/11 portray it as-where was the lefts sensitivity to that insult and offensiveness?  There was even a comment by the former Cat Stevens, aka Yousef Islam, who said that America had 9/11 coming and didn't feel any regret or sympathy for the nearly 3000 innocent victims.  Again, a comment that went unchallenged by the liberal panel) Morgan is lauded for being intelligent because he has an accent.  Seriously, why in the world does someone who has no journalistic experience, clearly can not stand the long-standing laws and traditions of their host country (where they make a pretty good living  I might add) and instinctively insult anyone that doesn't agree with them put on pedestals.  Are you surprised that this is and always has been the left-wing way?

Alinsky lives, folks.

Now Morgan, that bastion of Constitutional authority is crying foul on anybody who supports the second amendment.  One of many amendments that made America the freest country in the history of mankind.  But, yep, as usual (although history repeatedly dictates otherwise) the left knows best.  All hail Piers Morgan!  Asshole.

The Complete Hypocrisy of Dianne Feinstein

Once again, justice for me, not for thee.

ABC Quick to Falsely Accuse Tea Partier, But Ignore Occupy Terror Connection

Never ones to miss an opportunity to hide the crimes of their left-wing brethren, the "objective reporters" over at ABC have chosen to downplay (read: ignore) the connection of an alleged domestic terror suspect to the Occupy movement.  This comes not too long after the same network had no problem whatsoever ceremoniously blaming a Tea Party member for the movie theater shooting in Aurora, Colorado without any proof at all.

And you still trust the mainstream media?

NY's Journal News Gun Haters Hire Armed Guards to 'Protect' Them

Showing the epitome of left-wing hypocrisy, the reporters at New York's Journal News, the same "journalists" that published an on-line map of registered gun owners in its circulation area, have now hired armed guards to protect them from phantom crazies that may be "out to get them."   This of course is the result of a blogger enraged over the Journals publishing of the names and addresses of everyone listed as having a permit to carry a handgun within Westchester and Rockland counties, who then, using the same "public information" excuse, printed the home addresses of Journal News employees. 

Now, what would make them think they're safer being guarded by someone with a gun?