Wednesday, June 30, 2010
For All Those Robert Byrd Minions Out There
Why the libs continually and historically put racists, pedophiles, criminals (including all of the former from history) up on pedestals and then hypocritically denounce the right for any sort of malfeasance whatsoever (including the endless lies and unsubstantiated accusations) is mind boggling. Truly, it is.
As evidence for the above statements, here's a NewsBusters column about how MSNBC's Chris Tingle says he admired Byrd for honoring the American Revolution-era Gadsden flag as a "patriotic" stance against the Iraq War. Chrissy seems to excuse his own hypocrisy about how the flag was used as a symbol of fear and racism when used by the Tea Party. But when it's used symbolically by a REAL racist, and once again a senior Democrat, ah, no big deal.
A great comment left by the username of "cysusa" highlites the MSNBC host's blatant disregard of history and his own network's short-sightedness.
It's funny cause when Strom Thurmond died the media constantly mentioned (to just about the exclusion of everything else) that he had supported segregation and opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1957. No mention was made that he later changed to a moderate view of race relations. He was a Democrat during that period of his tenure and later became a Republican. I suspect that had he died as a Democrat he would have received the Byrd media treatment. It's not that people can't grow and change but only if you are a Democrat - at least as far as the lamestream is concerned.
So, just as a wrap-up (from another diligent commentor)
- Byrd was an officer in the KKK -- a Kleagle and an Exalted Cyclops.
- In 1944, Byrd wrote to Senator Theodore Bilbo:
“I shall never fight in the armed forces with a Negro by my side ... Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds.- Byrd fillibustered against the Civil Rights act.
- Byrd defended segregation.
- Byrd was against gay marriage and Clinton's "Don't ask, don't tell" rule
It seems as though Byrd was on the wrong side of history.
Yet he's being eulogized as some sort of legendary hero.
Considering the fact that Byrd was the longest serving US Senator, what specifically are his accomplishments?
Is there a famous piece of Byrd legislation?
Once again, the Looney Left tries to re-write history and is smacked down by their own pathetic attempts to masquerade their own.
Oh, and here's a typical example of the way lefty pundits will use any disgusting example to feed their Bush Derangement Syndrome.
Tuesday, June 29, 2010
Obama Signs On to Another Bush Policy
Now that everyone involved has apparently gotten over their fear of "invasion of privacy," will the New York Times and other news outlets worry about "ordinary" European citizens losing their freedom the way they played the fear card about American liberties with the Patriot Act?
Ooh, the far-left is going to really hate him now, huh? Go figure.
Robert Byrd Dies
Chip Reid excused Byrd's tenure in the Klan as “an effort to help his political career.”
From the CNN website:
"West Virginia Sen. Robert Byrd, the self-educated son of a coal miner who became the longest-serving member of Congress, died early Monday at age 92...a nine-term Democrat, was known as a master of the chamber's often-arcane rules and as the self-proclaimed "champion of the Constitution," a jealous guardian of congressional power. Colleagues are remembering Byrd for his humble nature, fighting spirit and determination.
Not his days longing for segregation or to lynch southern blacks.
I will eat my hat when the day finally arrives when the MSM will excuse any wrong-doing by a Republican or conservative just for simply being in that party.
Monday, June 28, 2010
Protester Riots at G20
Stories can be read here, here, here and a story of the non-coverage of the indifferent New York Times here.
Let's hear it for the idiotic left, yay!
Sen. Byrd "Very Ill" Admitted to Hospital
Iran Cancels Plan to Send Ship to Gaza
Sunday, June 27, 2010
Another "Who Cares?" Comment
It went like this:
Friday, June 25, 2010
Ech, If This Isn't Enough to Get Me Off of The Beatles
Thursday, June 24, 2010
Judge Who Blocked Drilling Moratorium Has Oil Investments
Jeb Bush Speaks Out on Obama's "Childishness"
Damn straight.
Networks Cover for Obama's "Misleading" the Public
At least that's the jist of this story.
HE MISLED THE COUNTRY! HE LIED! HE PREYED ON OUR FEARS!!
And all that good stuff.
Senators Send Obama Israel-Suporting Letter, Media Mum
As for the MSM not reporting this little gem, they either don't want Obama to look foolish or indifferent, or they don't want their narative of "everybody hates Israel" to be exposed. If they report that hundreds of American senators (including Harry Reid-Yikes!) support Israel and have to remind the president to do the same, it wouldn't look to good to ol' Barry now would it? And if Obama cleary comes out and publicly supports Israel, what would his new Islamic friends say?
Here is the letter itself. Was it really necessary to remind the President of the United States that Israel is an ally?
A Lot of Us Are Wondering...
C'mon MSM, let's be honest...for once.
McChrystal Gone, But Does That Solve Obama's Problem?
However, the question remains, did Obama do the right thing and dismiss a high-ranking officer because of insubordination, or was it to hide his deficiencies as a war president due to his abundance of inexperience? In other words, was McCrystal right? That's something the media has yet to ask. Of course, it goes without saying that the questioning of leadership decisions and tactics of a certain former president wouldn't be in doubt and the dismissal of a dissenting general would have no doubt been seen as a president passing the buck, as his firing would be seen as a cover-up of that president's incompetence. No matter, right?
McChrystal's replacement? Gen. David Patraeus. You know, the one that former New York senator and current Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton said one would have to enter a state of "disbelief" to believe any positive news that came out of Iraq, as the surge was actually turning around the Iraq War. The surge that both Clinton and Obama said wouldn't work. Will Clinton and Obama have so much trouble believing Patraeus now?
Finally, I find it quite peculiar that Obama dithered for months over whether to send more troops to Afghanistan, dithered for weeks over how to respond to the Deepwater Horizon spill. But when McChrystal criticized the president, he was gone in a day.
It's good to know where his priorities lie and that he can make a snap decision when he needs to. Uh huh, sure.
Wednesday, June 23, 2010
Carter Feels Bad He Might Not Be Able to Help Terrorists
About That Churchill Bust
This is what. Himself. Nah, he's not a narcissist.
I Bet You Didn't Know This
But like their analogy to the treatment of chickens on KFC farms to the Holocaust, the group is now in hot water for their own treatment for so-called "unadaptable" animals.
Other Sites of Interest
Thanks to Moonbattery for the awesome list:
Accuracy in Media
Against Hillary Clinton
ALIPAC
Alternative Right
American Thinker
Ann Coulter
Anti-CAIR
AnyStreet.org
Best Obama Facts
Best of the Web Today
Border Invasion Pics
BoycottLiberalism.com
Campus Watch
Carbon Liberators
Celeb Politics
CeliberalCenter for Consumer Freedom
ChronWatch
City Journal
CubanologyDaily Benefactor
Don't Vote for Obama
Family Security Matters
Fight Barackfightpc.net
FIREFree Republic
FrontPage Magazine
G.I. Woodshop
Global Warming Hoax
Global Warming Insanity
Grade Gov
GrasstopsUSA.com
Green Tracking Library
Hanoi Jane
Heritage Foundation
Hitler Was a Leftist
Human Events Online
In Their Own Words
Internet Radio Network
JunkScience.com
LifeSite
LinkiestLucianne.com
Mark Levin
Media Research Center
MinutemanHQ
Move America Forward
Museum of Communism
NAFBPO
National Review Online
Obama File
OpinionJournal
Patriotic Resistance
PETA Kills Animals
Prophet of Doom
ProtestShooter.com
RealClearPolitics
Real Cuba
The Regulators
Rezkorama
RFC RadioRightNation.US
Rush Limbaugh
stopACORN.org
Target of Opportunity
Temple of the Goracle
Times Watch
Townhall
USA Wake Up.org
Ushanka.us
VDARE.com
VDH's Private Papers
Viral Footage
Weekly Standard
WeHateGringos
Zombie
Just doing my part to spread the word(s)
Obama Administration Considering Mass Amnesty?
Is Obama too friendly to illegals? Such a story as above would indicate that he most certainly is. However, a piece by the Detroit News, Alex Nowrasteh indicates that President Obama may just be one of "the most anti-immigrant president since Eisenhower. "
"The Obama administration is setting deportation records. Almost 300,000 illegal immigrants were deported in 2009, a record, and a 5 percent increase over 2008. An Immigration and Customs Enforcement memo last February lamented that deportations for 2010 would not reach the yearly quota of 400,000 unless strategies were changed. That President Obama is presiding over a deportation quota, and that his immigration enforcement service was trying to increase the pace of deportations, was a rude shock to many immigrant supporters of the president.
Obama's Department of Labor (DOL) has put in place new regulations that will make it more difficult for American farmers to temporarily hire foreign workers. The regulations will raise the minimum wage for foreign farm workers and transfer all compliance costs to employers. This will likely have the unintended cost of pushing more foreigners and farmers into the black market.
Obama's administration is also mulling increasing the fees for permanent residence cards by $75, applications for naturalization certificates by $140, and applications for status as a temporary resident by $420. These hikes would raise unsubstantial sums for the government but dash the hopes of many poor potential immigrants. The administration is trying to make hiring foreigners more difficult to help American workers. Making the hiring of foreigners more bureaucratic will funnel many of them into the illegal market. But farmers can always hire people off the books if the cost of hiring legal foreign workers or Americans becomes too high. Thanks to these and other regulations, there will be plenty of willing illegal immigrants ready to snap up new job opportunities.
The Obama administration is also expanding workplace immigration raids. There are more than 25,000 random workplace H1-B visa inspections scheduled next year -- a fivefold increase over last year! The H1-B is a company-sponsored temporary work visa for highly skilled and educated foreigners. Limited to 85,000 for private corporations (there is no quota for nonprofit research institutions), 25,000 inspections could well cover the majority of firms employing H-1Bs.Workplace inspections are very destructive interventions. When government agents inspect businesses, work can grind to a halt for days on end as they take their time checking paperwork, interviewing people, and comparing the acquired information with their files.
President Obama ordered 1,200 National Guard troops to Arizona recently and is seeking an additional $500 million for border security. Add that to more than 90,000 employees in the federal immigration services and more than $20 billion devoted to enforcing immigration laws, and it's clear that Obama is doing more to combat illegal immigration than any president in living history."
Could this be true?
McChrystal's Feet to the Fire
Should McChrystal be fired? No. should he reprimanded? Yes. But since Bush had the thick skin to handle the opinions of his underlings without going all dictator and calling for their heads (as I'm sure the media was ready and hoping for) Barack Obama should, and is, doing the same.
UPDATE: McChrystal resigns.
Probably the right thing to do, even if he is right.
But my beef is, where is all the support from the MSM? If you remember, whenever a fellow Republican, high-ranking military official, or some "anonymous" source inside the Bush administration was critical of any Bush decision regarding the Iraq War (Donald Rumsfeld not withstanding) the media couldn't wait to air their dirty laundry. Media organizations would salivate at the opportunity to have a Bush insider tell everyone how poor the president's choices were or how they had lost confidence in their commander-in-chief. The only reason it's a story to them now is because of how "inappropriate" it is to publicly ostracize President Obama. Again, they're right, but where's the consistency?
Bias? What bias?
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
Times Square Bomber Pleads Guilty, Says More Attacks Coming
Al-Qaida's U.S.-born spokesman, Adam Gadahn, speaks of warnings of such future attacks.
The Wealthiest of the Wealthy Paid More Taxes Under Bush
I've got a feeling the left doesn't care too much for the Congressional Budget Office these days, with it's facts and figures exposing the lie that is this myth and the numbers that are not all that popular with Dems that sold their souls in ramming Obamacare down everyone's throats.
Monday, June 21, 2010
Happy Anniversary
Yay for me.
Chris Tingle Looking For a Fake Emmy?
Apparently, it takes more than this drivel.
Since I didn't watch Chris Matthews' mockumentary, "The Rise of the New Right," you know, since it was on MSNBC; and because I knew exactly what it was going to be, good thing News Reel Blog.com's Lori Ziganto did.
Seriously, where do these loons come up with this stuff? And again with the Timothy McVeigh references. Fifteen years and all they can come with is Timothy McVeigh? If right-wingers and Christian zealots are churning out violence everyday, how come they can't come up with any other name? How about Ted Kazinsky? He was a pretty violent, anti-government type of guy, wasnt he? Hm. Maybe it's because he was a left-wing university professor? You think that has anything to do with the fact none of these left-wing pundits and cable hosts never mention him in the same breath as "right-wing extremists?" I don't know why not? They can always lie and propagate about him too and just say he was a crazy right-winger like all the rest.
Pathetic. But yet, highly predictable.
And just as an example, here is some really recent (as opposed to 15 years ago) left-wing violence against free speech.
Emanuel Quitting?
Who will run around naked pointing their fingers in people's faces?
Sunday, June 20, 2010
The More Things Change...
He was and is right. And nothing's changed.
Of Course
Or is it just Bush's fault again?
"Republicans support many of the policies in the legislation but are demanding changes to shrink its toll on the deficit."
Um, Just to Let You Know
A Comparison
But his glorious turns at the mic, as some may see them, are really not all that comparative when put up alongside great speeches and even off the cuff remarks by former presidents throughout history.
It seems to me the halo has lost it's luster and the wheels of myth about the man are losing a few lugnuts each and every day:
Granted, a lot is taken out of context, but still.
H/T to Moonbattery.
Is There Any Doubt?
"If Barack Obama isn't careful, he will become the Jimmy Carter of the 21st century."
He will become? Yeah, well...
N. Korea Phasing Out Communism?
Thursday, June 17, 2010
Well Whaddya Know? No Consensus on IPCC Board
Oh, please let this be confirmed. Along with the "Climategate" e-mails, I'd say this should rightfully be the death-knell of the whole silly and fraudulent endeavour.
I guess we'll just have to wait for the inevitable charges of fraud and lies towards the source after they try to discredit him. HuffPo, the Kos and their favourite reader/propagandist, Keith Olbermann should have a field day with this one.
Let's take a look at some lies and willful propaganda by the Goracle all in the name of the almighty dollar.
H/T to Moonbattery & Gateway Pundit.
Armed Couple Attempts to Enter Air Force Base
They have been identified as Spc. Christopher Paul Kilburn, and Micah Goodier of Palm Beach County. Kilburn was at the time AWOL.
There Goes Maddow Again...
After seeing this I was thinking the same thing as, apparently, Newsbusters' Jack Coleman was. They're really on top of such things at NB, aren't they?
Wednesday, June 16, 2010
Ok, Who Are These Guys and What Did They Do with Olbermann and Matthews?
It has to be official now. The MSM is now tired of Obama's waffeling and inexperience. They would never say that mind you, after all they've invested in the last two years building up the guy, protecting and making endless excuses for him. When Olberloon and Tingle are bashing the guy, is Hopey/Changey seen it's end?
Yeeaah, probably not. The real Olbie and Chrissy will be back tomorrow, I'm sure.
"Fox News North" to be Launched in Canada
Uh oh. No more automatic praising by the Canadian liberal press.
Searching for Bin Laden
Well, considering the amount of time he's already been to Pakistan and figuring on the amount of info he's gathered (if any worthwhile) I wouldn't be surprised if we learn bin Laden is found assassinated. He'd be a heor to the right and a Timothy McVeigh to the left. Do you think Obama would have the cahonies to pin a medal on this guy, or would he tell Eric Holder to ship him off to Guantonamo? Is that place still open?
Students That Were Shown "How to Dissent" Want Teachers Fired
Finally, even students are now recognising the honor and sacrifice that soldiers commit to when they choose to serve their country, and that liberal indoctrination is not "free speech." At least those who haven't been indoctrinated already.
"Who Cares" if President Golfs During Crisis?
To his credit, Stromberg does mention that, "it was unfair when Michael Moore did this to George W. Bush," referring to Gateway Pundit’s Jim Hoft's piece on how Obama is spending too much time on the golf course when he should be more involved in the spill, yet, ealier in the article he says, "Hoft’s dismissive, one-word take: “Leadership.” My reaction: So what?"
So what? Well, that's not what his buddies and fellow Obama apologists were at the Post were saying in 2002.
Bias? What bias?
Newsweek Slammed on Palin Story
Smearing Conservative Women
In 1992, the feminists in the media rejoiced at what they called “The Year of the Woman,” when ten Democratic women (and one Republican) were running for the Senate in the aftermath of Anita Hill’s unproven sexual-harassment allegations against Clarence Thomas. Just two years before, seven Republican women (and two Democrats) ran. But the media yawned.
In 1992, the evening newscasts aired 29 stories exclusively devoted to women Senate candidates. In 1990, there was one...on election night. In 1992, the morning shows interviewed women Senate candidates on 26 occasions. In 1990, there were zero interviews.
This was all about the party affiliation. When the liberals Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein both won primary elections from the U.S. Senate in California in 1992, Time reporter Margaret Carlson almost levitated in ecstasy. “There was a rush, an exultation, that surpassed any political moment I have ever known -- better even than Geraldine Ferraro's vice-presidential candidacy."
The primary elections on June 8 brought this memory rushing back. Republican women won gubernatorial primaries in South Carolina and New Mexico. The national media had plenty to say about Nikki Haley of South Carolina before the election, which is to say they had an endless regurgitation of unproven adultery charges to level against her.
One low point came from former Clinton bimbo-crusher George Stephanopoulos on ABC’s “Good Morning America,” asking Nikki Haley on the morning after her victory about how she’s somehow embarrassing her state by being accused without proof:
“Do you expect more incoming during the runoff?” And: “Can you assure South Carolina voters that they're not going to be embarrassed if they elect you?”
Stephanopoulos, like many good Clintonistas, is incapable of embarrassment over his hypocrisy.
Susana Martinez, winner of her gubernatorial primary in New Mexico, has another complaint. One gathers New Mexico is too far away from the East Coast for the media to notice. She’s been utterly ignored.
Then there are the two female business leaders who won their GOP primaries in California, one for the Senate and the other for governor. On ABC, Stephanopoulos demeaned their business credentials of as a minus, not a plus, because of the oil spill. “Meg Whitman, head of eBay. Carly Fiorina ran Hewlett- Packard. There's some controversy there.”
Stephanopoulos had invited on the perpetually annoying British import Tina Brown, who complained “it almost feels as if all these women winning are kind of a blow to feminism. Because, each one of them, really, most of them, are, you know, very much, you know, against so many of things that women have fought for such a long time.”
George Stephanopoulos invited no Republican guests on this occasion, so he attempted a mild rebuttal to Brown: “Well, you could argue they're different kinds of feminists. They've had a lot of success in different fields.” Brown snapped back: “Women, too, can be wingnuts, is the point.” It’s bizarre that Brown is so blind that she doesn’t think you could call Barbara Boxer or her beloved Hillary Clinton a “wingnut,” only the conservative or Republican women.
Several networks found “news” and some kind of national controversy in Fiorina mocking Sen. Boxer’s hairdo as “so yesterday” when she was wearing an open microphone off-camera. Stephanopoulos gave it a whole story when he moonlighted as evening anchorman on “World News.” NBC’s “Today” led off the show with this nothing-burger and mentioned it three times. Co-host Hoda Kotb touted it as a “big gaffe-a-rooney.”
Newsweek’s Eleanor Clift insisted Fiorina was wrong about just who was “so yesterday” in politics. “And these two Republican women are also social conservatives in a state that's very pro-choice. So maybe those issues will be cast as ‘so yesterday.’” Eleanor’s wishful thinking had to be corrected by Monica Crowley, who informed her that Whitman favors abortion.
That’s not as bad as Jerry Brown accusing Whitman in advance of tarring him in her ads: “It's like Goebbels. Goebbels invented this kind of propaganda. He took control of the whole world. She wants to be president. That's her ambition, the first woman president. That's what this is all about.”
Amount of network outrage? Zip. The only network mention came from ABC’s Jake Tapper on “This Week,” and even he said “regardless of the tastelessness, Jerry Brown has a point...that she has a lot of money.” The media can disregard a lot of tastelessness when the women who are smeared are Republicans.
Tuesday, June 15, 2010
How Will the Media Spin This One?
Elsewhere such as...Brazil? Which is exactly where Soros is heavily invested in a company called, Petrobras, a Brazilian-owned oil company.
I wonder if the Daily Koz will do a little blurb about this? Nah, probably not.
UPDATE: Tammy Bruce has a good piece on it.
Oh Brilliant!
Then there's the really stupid things that he really could have avoided (like beginning his political career in the living room of a known, admitted, domestic terrorist) like keeping quite and not backing Iranian dissenters in their last, rigged election to keep Ahmedinawhackjob in office, or putting a admitted Socialist/Truther in the Energy cabinet, or how about allowing Air Force One fly over Manhattan, New York, reminiscent of 9/11?
Well, speaking of 9/11, the Great Leader, in all his wisdom, searching desperately it seems, to find any analogy to tie into the BP spill so people will feel sorry for him and not focus in on his most recent example of ineptitude; compared the oil spill in the Gulf to September 11, 2001.
Let's see, create bad relations with Germany...check. Create bad relations with Israel...check. Oh wait, we're forgetting someone. Oh right, let's create a divide between America and long-standing ally, Great Britain...check.
Monday, June 14, 2010
Saudi Arabia Clears the Way for Israel to Strike Iran
Apparently not everyone hates Israel as much as they distrust Iran.
Syria Called on Their Lies and Propaganda at the UN
With all the evidence to the contrary, when will this crap end?
Ladies and Gentlemen...
I think an assault charge is in order.
UPDATE: Well it didn't take long for the predictable apologists at A Mess NBC to not only excuse Ehtheridge, but actually portray him as the victim:
Chris Tingle wasn't the only Obamaphile standing by his man, Tamron Hall spun the facts as well.
"...there are some Democrats that are blasting the people allegedly behind this video....some would catagorize that as an ambush interview..."
"One of these so-called camera men at one point reportedly identified himself as a student, so there's discrepancy over who these individuals really are."
NBC correspondent Luke Russert: "...nobody knows who these, quote, 'students' are"
Citing Democratic Party spokesman, Brad Woodhouse, claiming "...they were actually Republican Party operatives."
"So a lot of Democrats are saying 'wait, hold on, this was a set up. This guy was intentionally put out to do this by the Republican Party.'"
Talk about paranoia. RHETORICAL QUESTION...Do these "professionals" remember, even a little bit, the plants at all those Tea Party rallies (sent from the DOA "Coffee Party," I'm thinking) that held up racist signs designed to re-inforce the already debumked myth that all Tea Partiers are ignorant racists? Like I said, it was a rhetorical question.
By the way, Etheridge apologised. "I sincerely regret my actions...have no excuse...never do it again, blah, blah, blah."
"The truth is I had a long day," he said. "I've had bad days many times. It's not a good crutch to lean on and I won't use that." I'm sure he meant to say "after this."
This Has to be Confirmed
Again, if this report is true, this came from the lips of your president, America. You know, that whole "stupid" birth certificate thing is starting to look like it has legs. I still doubt the conspiracy of it all, but with his ever-growing slips of "my Muslim faith" and the above emboldened quote, as well as the above link, something may indeed be amiss here.
Did you catch that one part right at the beginning? "He asked that the Moslem world show patience. Obama promised that once he overcame some domestic American problems (Healthcare), that he would show the Moslem world what he would do with Israel." -Egyptian Foreign Minister Abul Gheit
I still don't think I believe in the whole conspiracy aspect of this, but this is compelling evidence when put into context.
Once again:
March 2009, Obama declares the "war on terror" is over despite a dramatic increase in jihad war ops.
March 2009, he floats the idea that he will talk to violent, genocidal Hamas.
March 2009, he demands, recruits and insists that more Muslim Americans work in the Obama administration.
April 2009, Obama tells Europe to admit Islamic Turkey into EU, much to the consternation of the Europeans.
April 2009, Obama demands non-Muslims respect Islam (despite our differences) in a speech in Turkey.
April 2009, Obama in a speech from Turkey: "We are not a Christian nation."
April 2009, Dalia Mogahed, the first hijab-clad senior adviser to Obama on Muslim affairs says in an interview with terrorist- and jihad-supporting Sheik Yusuf Qaradawi's website, "Many have claimed that terrorists have 'hijacked Islam'. I disagree. I think Islam is safe and thriving in the lives of Muslims around the world. What the terrorists have been allowed to take over are Muslim grievances."
In April 2009, Obama lays groundwork for a partnership with Hamas.
May 2009, Obama promises to offer his "personal commitment" to Muslims.
May 2009, Obama calls America "one of the largest Muslim countries on the planet."
June 2009, Obama invites the Muslim Brotherhood, violent global jihadist group whose sole objective is a universal caliphate, to his speech to the ummah (Muslim community) in Cairo.
June 2009, Obama makes a stunning speech to the Muslim world from Al Azhar University in Cairo. It defies explanation.
July 2009, Obama reaches out to the violent jihadists of Hezb'allah.
July 2009, Obama creates a new office at the State department, Outreach to the Worldwide Muslim community, reporting directly to Hillary Clinton.
July 2009 State Department Welcomes Hamas Mouthpiece, Al-Quds TV, to DC to Film Propaganda.
Obama promises to close GITMO.
Obama is rebuked when plans are revealed for CIA prosecutions for 911 interrogations: Seven Ex-chiefs of CIA Oppose Case Review: ALL Sign letter to Stop CIA Persecutions.
In July, Obama sanctions the brutal crackdown of those marching for freedom in Iran and sides with the mullahcracy. He stands silent about the Iranian regime's mass executions, mass rape and murder.
July 2009, Obama plans to slash US nuclear arsenal.
September 2009. Bolton on Obama at the UN: "This is the most radical anti-Israel speech I can recall any president making" "I have to say I was very shaken by this speech."
October 2009, Obama offers millions in Muslim technology fund.
November 2009, Fort Hood Jihad Cover up: Obama Urges Congress To Put Off Fort Hood Probe, Warns Against Turning Tragedy Into "Political Theater."
November 2009, Obama offers the Taliban control of the Kandahar, Helmand, Oruzgan, Kunar and Nuristan provinces, in return for a halt to the Taliban missile attacks on U.S. bases.
November 2009, Obama Reaches out to bloody Jihadis in the Philippines.
On Thanksgiving eve, Obama issues a special Hajj message to the world's Muslims.
December 2009, Obama's "Non-Religious" White House Christmas and No Christmas Gifts for his Kids.
February 2010, Obama names a Hafiz to the Organization of the Islamic Conference. "And as a hafiz of the Koran, [Hussain] is a respected member of the American Muslim community," Obama said in his message to the Doha meeting, using the term for someone who has mastered and memorized the Muslim holy book.
February 2010, Obama cuts US space program, orders NASA to work with Muslim countries.
February 2010, covering up for jihadists in the White House.
Obama's counter terrorism adviser, John Brennan, Involved in Obama Passport Breach.
March 2010, Obama Obsession with Islam: Calls 'entrepreneurship summit' with Muslims.
April 2010, Libyan Pres Gaddafi Praises Obama: "Barakeh Obama is friend" "He is of Muslim descent, his policy should be supported...."
May 2010, Obama's Counterterrorism Adviser Calls Jihad "Legitimate Tenet of Islam."
May 2010, White House Pro-Terrorism John Brennan Speechifies in Arabic, Equates Terrorists with Shoplifters, Lawmakers Call for his Firing.
June 2010, Obama equivocates on the jihad warship convoy (affectionately named a "flotilla" by the media): Obama "Expressed a Deep Regret Over Loss of [Jihadist] Life."
June 2010, Obama Administration to Support Anti-Israel Resolution at UN.
Plus...
No American flags behind him. The first ever for an American president, I believe when holding a press conference. However that tapestry behind him "is a 'damask,' which is traditionally a silk material woven in Damascus, Syria."
Is it any wonder then, that House Minority Leader, John Boehner said, "We've coddled our enemies and pushed our friends aside?"
H/T from Atlas Shrugs.
And if he has sworn allegiance to Islam (which would be the biggest, most brilliant scam on America EVER!) is this why Mosab Hassan Yousef is being deported? Is it because he's a Christian convert? Because he broke with the policies and murderous tendencies of Hamas? Is it because he wrote a tell-all book that described Hamas's agenda and hate of America? If Obama is indeed a Muslim (really, who knows? The guy is the most secretive president ever-what with his sealed personal documents and all. Again, why?) this would be the guy to deport. Nevermind any illegal gang-bangers or drug smugglers. It has to be someone who converted to Christianity and is a threat to terrorists everywhere.
OMG! The NYT Rips Obama?
Not only did the NYT editorial pages condemn the president for his lack of vision and response in print, but their White House correspondent, Helene Cooper also said pretty much said on The Chris Matthews Show what I've been saying since the 2008 primaries, that Barack Obama is in serious danger of cloning himself as the total failure that was Jimmy Carter.
The reason right-wing blogs and television pundits are so surprised whenever left-wing journalists and pundits actually act like journalists and do their jobs as objective professionals, is because stories like these simply do not happen in today's Obama-loving media world. Therefore, they must be highlited whenever spotted. Especially when it comes from the pages of a left-tilted newspaper like the New York Times.
Saturday, June 12, 2010
WaPo Columnist Whines that Obama is Human Afterall
Now that his ineffectualness and inexperience is showing by leaps and bounds, the Washington Post's Paul Starobin wants everyone to lay off President Obama. He even commands America to "wake up!"
Starobin is a wee bit upset that the president is now shown to be fallible. He's upset that Obama has now been exposed as being out of his league and a deer in the headlights. This isn't just about BP either. He has shown to be the wrong person for the job since day one. Is it American's fault that Obama is the lackluster president that he is? Well, yes; at least the fault of roughly 53 million people who voted for him. I'm sure the mainstream media and their non-vetting of the former junior senator, along with their love for anything not George W. Bush that helped to whitewash anything negative about Obama didn't help matters.
But apparently, Starobin wants everyone to remain in fawn-mode. He pleads for everyone to have patience for the president. For a guy who has held the office for a year and a half (basically half of what will surely be his entire term) how much patience for him are Americans supposed to show? For a guy with the same exact mindset that blames Bush for everything that gives liberals like him a headache, it's about time that people like Starobin realize Americans (even people that have buyer's remorse in voting for Obama, including some members of the liberal press) have woken up. That's why the backlash and condemnation for the president. Is everything going wrong in the Obama camp his fault? No. But you can't sell someone as Superman and then be upset when the people start to realize he's just Clark Kent in a media-adorned cape.
This is Why Democrats and Liberals Know Jack About the Economy
Maybe they just can't comprehend the questions either.
Oh This is Going Platinum
Simply marvelous.
By the way, did I hear him say that someone else has no idea what they're doing?
Oh, the irony.
Thursday, June 10, 2010
More Violence from the Left
Remember,
Barack Obama gave his marching orders:
Obama: “They Bring a Knife…We Bring a Gun”
Obama to His Followers: “Get in Their Faces!”
Obama on ACORN Mobs: “I don’t want to quell anger. I think people are right to be angry! I’m angry!”
Obama To His Mercenary Army: “Hit Back Twice As Hard”
Obama to BP: “We talk to these folks… So I know whose a$$ to kick.”
But it's only conservative radio personalities (with no clear evidence that they actually are leaders of the Republican Party or that they condone or promote violence...unlike the actual leader of the Democrat Party, you know the President of the United States?) that promote violence, remember?
Rolling Stone Hits Obama?
Obama's Inexperience and Ineffectualness Costing Allies
Wasn't this guy supposed to save the world? He definitely is changing it.
By the way, the reason Obama is not helping to disuade Israel's enemies? From "Audacity of Hope," referrring to Muslim-Americans:
"...they need specific assurances that their citizenship really means something, that America has learned the right lessons from the Japanese internments during World War II, and that I will stand with them should the political winds shift in an ugly direction."
In context.
At least that's one statement he has stuck by.
Funny isn't it, that Mahmoud Abbas, the leader of the Palestinian Authority gets a nice big handshake, warm, fuzzy smile and a juicy photo-op with Obama and $400 million from American taxpayers for new weapons and propaganda to use against Istrael, yet Benjamin Netanyahu gets snubbed and his visit cancelled.
Hope and change. Dig it.
Praised by Hezbollah

Wednesday, June 09, 2010
You See?
By this logic, isn't America still mopping up the mess that was the total failure of Jimmy Carter? (read: Iran)
The Real Legacy of Helen Thomas
Brent Bozell has a nice little send-off of his own. I would think it's a tad more accurate about her career and vision of the world.
How this woman managed to hold on to her position in the White House Press Corps, much less any type of staff job with any publication for so long is beyond me.
Tuesday, June 08, 2010
The Gaza Flotilla: Falsehoods and Facts
HonestReporting also let's us know what's going on. Click on the link of your choice to see how the anti-Israel media omits and manipulates facts to confuse and lie to you.
Just a slight difference in facts, huh? Such as lack of any of "those poor, peaceful, oppressed Palestinians," sob stories; who are actually Jew-killing frauds in the vein of their enabling masters, the government of Iran.
It's amazing to me, that these people will believe any unproven conspiracy theory involving Israel, the U.S. (especially if George W. Bush's name is remotely involved) but simply refuse to see the truth in front of them that has been exposed for decades, if not centuries.
By the way, do you know how Iran got it's name? So Ahmedinejad has more in common with Hitler than we thought, huh?
Dennis Prager: If Only Israel Were the Evil Ones
Let's hope the world is right.
Israel is almost totally isolated. A visitor from another planet would have every reason to report back home that the greatest problem on planet earth was this planet's Jewish state. Though Israel is the size of the American state of New Jersey and smaller than El Salvador, and though its population is smaller than that of Sweden, Burundi and Bolivia, it is the most censured country in United Nations history.
Let's hope the world is right.
Though Israel is a thriving liberal democracy for all its citizens, including the one out of five that is Arab (83 percent of whom are Muslim), with an independent judiciary and press; though it signed an agreement establishing an independent Palestinian state; though it returned to Egypt every inch of the Sinai Peninsula, a land mass larger than Israel itself with major oil reserves -- the world deems Israel a villain.
Let's hope the world is right.
Though Hamas runs a theocratic police state based on torture and terror, with no freedom of speech, no freedom for any religious expression outside of radical Islam, seeks to annihilate the Jewish state, and its state-controlled media depict Israelis and Jews as worthy of death, the world sees Israel, not Hamas, as the villain.
Let's hope the world is right.
Here is a random sampling of world reactions:
"The EU condemns the use of violence that has produced a high number of victims among the members of the flotilla ..."
"The President of (France) expresses his profound emotion in the face of the tragic consequences of the Israeli military operation," Sarkozy's office said. "He condemns the disproportionate use of force ..."
"Spain unequivocally condemns the Israeli attack on the humanitarian flotilla and it does so as a country and as the acting president of the EU Council."
"Swedish Port Workers Union spokesman Peter Annerback says workers will refuse to handle Israeli goods and ships ..."
"The Swedish Football Association said it was to ask European football's highest body, UEFA, to rule if the qualifier scheduled for Friday in Tel Aviv should go ahead or not, citing the 'strong reactions in Sweden and around the world.'"
"Norway's military says it has cancelled a special operations seminar because the Defence Ministry objected to the inclusion of an Israeli army officer in the program ... Norway calls for boycott on arms to Israel."
South Africa recalled its ambassador to Israel, Ismail Coovadia, "to show our strongest condemnation of the attack."
India announced that "There can be no justification for such indiscriminate use of force, which we condemn."
"The Argentine Government expressed on Monday its condemnation of Israel's naval attack to an (sic) humanitarian six-ship flotilla."
The Brazilian Foreign Ministry in a statement said that "Brazil strongly condemns the Israeli attack, because there was no justification ..."
Italian foreign minister Franco Frattini: "I deplore in the strongest terms the killing of civilians. This is certainly a grave act."
The News, the leading Pakistani English daily: "This monstrous outrage has caught the world's attention and once again put the spotlight on the activities of a state that has been a law unto itself for most of its life."
China's Foreign Ministry spokesman Ma Zhaoxu: "We were shocked by the Israeli attack which led to severe casualties and condemn it."
Let's hope that the European Union, France, Spain, Sweden, Norway, South Africa, India, Argentina, Brazil, Italy, Pakistan, China and nearly all other nations are right.
And not just nations, of course. According to Amnesty International, "It is imperative that Israel lifts the blockade of Gaza without delay, as it is a form of collective punishment ... Israel should invite the relevant UN experts to carry out an investigation ... It begs credibility that the level of lethal force used by Israeli troops could have been justified. It appears to have been out of all proportion to any threat posed."
To restate AI's positions:
1) Since blockades are "collective punishment," presumably Amnesty International deems all blockades as immoral.
2) The U.N. is fair regarding Israel, so Israel should support a U.N. investigation.
3) And the Israeli soldiers should have allowed themselves to be beaten to death rather than throw away their paintball guns and use real ones.
Let's hope Amnesty International is right.
Now, some representative views in American newspaper editorials:
The Los Angeles Times, in its editorial, posed some deep questions.
Here are three:
"Were the boats ferrying novelists and Nobel Peace Prize winners and elderly Holocaust survivors, as news accounts have suggested, or seething Israel haters, as defenders of the raid would have us believe?"
Apparently, the Los Angeles Times believes that novelists, Nobel Peace Prize winners and elderly Holocaust survivors cannot be "seething Israel-haters."
"Was the goal to bring 10,000 tons of aid to needy Gazans in an act of peaceful civil disobedience, or to provoke Israel into just this sort of violent response? ..."
I did not make this up in order to embarrass the LATimes. They really posed this question.
"We agree with U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon that the blockade '... hurts forces of moderation and empowers extremists.'"
Unlike the Times, many of us thought that Palestinian extremists were more powerful than the "forces of moderation" prior to the blockade.
Let's hope the Los Angeles Times is right.
And now, The New York Times editorial:
"There can be no excuse for the way that Israel completely mishandled the incident ... It has damaged Israel's ties with Turkey, once its closest ally in the Muslim world."
"No excuse?" Being beaten to death by "peace activists" while carrying paintball guns is "no excuse"? And why wasn't it Turkey's sponsorship of an Islamist organization labeled a terrorist group by the American government that damaged Turkey's relations with Israel? Why is it not Turkey's cooperation with Iran's Holocaust-denying, Holocaust-planning Ahmadinejad that has damaged Turkish-Israeli relations?
Let's hope The New York Times is right.
The reason mankind has to hope that the world, its leaders, its newspapers, its so-called human rights organizations and the United Nations are right about Israel is quite simple: If Israel is the decent party in its war with the Palestinian Authority and Hamas -- and nearly all the world's countries, nearly all the world's media and the United Nations are morally wrong -- what hope is there for humanity? If the world's moral compass is that broken, are we not sailing into a dark age?
If only.
Barbour Doesn't Have A Clue
Um, WHAT?
More Domestic Wannabe Terrorists Arrested in NY
“We’ll start doing killing here, if I can’t do it over there.”
“I leave this time, God willing, I never come back. I’ll never see this crap hole. Only way I would come back here is if I was in the land of jihad and the leader ordered me to come back here and do something here. Ah, I love that.”
-Mohamed Mahmood Alessa
Could be just another couple of Timothy McVeighs, though. I can't be too sure.
Sexism & Hypocrisy
Well now that Right Wing News has released a list of the "20 Hottest Conservative Women," Newsweek all of a sudden is up in arms about the labeling and sexism towards women.
Dana Loesch has an excellent rebuttal on the Newsweek pseudo-respect story. Well, she was #1 on the RWN piece, after all.
Again, the left is just whining because 1) Newsweek can't sell and they need anything to make conservatives look bad (which is maybe why the geniuses there are losing readership in the first place) 2) Other than Contessa Brewer, and Kirsten Powers, they don't have too many good-looking liberal women. Then again, Brewer isn't really liberal is she? She's an "unbiased" journalist/anchor.
Reuters Pulls Out Their Fauxtography Card Again
REUTERS..."PR team in support of terrorism."
Obama Preaches: "Don't Make Excuses"
Interesting (if not laugh out loud hysterical) because wasn't it revealed just about a week and a half ago the Democrat game plan for this November would be to blame their favorite scapegoat for infinity?
Do they have any idea how tired the people are getting of this whole "pass the buck" mentality? Is it any wonder most Americans see this guy as a glorified used car salesman and not a leader?
Helen Thomas Retires
I guess the liberalest of liberals realizes now that you can't be an obvious anti-Semite and Democrat shill and remain untouchable forever. Not that I have to say this, but THERE IS A GOD!!!
Monday, June 07, 2010
Is the Halo Losing It's Luster?
The Fascist Doctrine Has a Baby Sister
Iran Looking to Start Something
Where's the calls of Iran's attempt at instigation from all the moronic bleeding hearts? Everybody knows where this is going. It looks like Khamenei and Ahmadinejad are picking their spots and with the international "outcry" and their world-wide anti-Semitic loyalists.
What kind of freaking bizarro world do we live in?
The Secretary of State even saw this coming, it seems.
Obama Ignores 66th Anniversary of D-Day?
So, first on Memorial Day, when the President of the United States should be honoring all fallen heroes of every war, he goes on vacation, then on D-Day, of all days he honors the words of a Communist dictator? What more do you Obamaphiles need? Or did you already know this about him when you made the awful and historically dreadful mistake of making him your president?
This is so insulting to the cherished memories of all of America's fallen warriors and their families. The man is unfit for command. And yet again, the left-wing media is silent. Not that I'm surprised. With their hatred for the military, how could anyone be?
Hope and change.
Wow! Two Cases of BDS In One Day
At this rate, I'm surprised Chris Matthews or Rachel Maddow doesn't blame Bush for Detroit Tiger's pitcher Armando Galarraga's missed opportunity at a perfect game. I'm sure if you scan all the photos of the crowd that day, or along the Detroit city skyline, you'll see ol' W, in some office building window, heckling to himself on another job well done.
Sunday, June 06, 2010
Helen Thomas: Her Comments on the Jooos and the Aftermath
Former Bush Press Secretary, Ari Fleischer, who is of Jewish descent, thinks she should be fired. She's not just spewing eye-rolling inducing irrelevant comments any more.
She's been dropped from from her agency, Nine Speaker. And others want her to pay for her ignorant and bigoted comments. It's about time this fossil was held responsible for her outrageous, ill-informed comments and bigotry.
I guess she now knows that even with her decades of experience and connections, she should have paid more attention to the Dan Rather affair and realized she's not untouchable.
Really, it's about time.
Remembering D-Day

And as Ben Stein says in this column from Lonely Conservative, who knew President Bush delivered such a beautiful D-Day speech while in Normady? It certainly didn't get any mention from the liberal press, but being it was on the same day as President Reagan's death, if not on the anniversary of D-Day itself, even conservative outlet's had put it somewhat on the back-burner.
Be sure to follow the link to the article by Carl Cannon.